LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
20 与 Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREDefault judgment sought pursuant to r 21.02 of the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic) and r 2.07(1) of the Supreme Court (Miscellaneous Civil Proceedings) Rules 2018(Vic)Where no defence filed despite order

债务纠纷:父子反目,资产遭追讨!

2024-10-03 ATTIWILL
Norton Rose FulbrightHicks Oakley Chessell Williams
查看案例摘要
  • INTERESTClaim for interest calculated by reference to penalty interest ratesWhether ‘good cause’ shownDiscretion with respect to applicable interest rate

    兄弟对决:法庭揭示遗产争夺战背后的信任危机与财产索赔

    2024-02-19 O’MEARA
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • WILLSApplication for judicial advice on construction of willWhere deceased provided for alternate clauses in will depending on whether property as defined was owned by her at deathWhere property was a farm part of which had sold and to which a portion had been added by adverse possession after the will was executed and prior to death

    《母亲遗愿引争议,七子争夺家族农场的法律困局》

    2024-02-14 GORTON
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • TRUSTSWhere estates not distributed in accordance with terms of testators’ willsEstablishment of a discretionary family trustDeclaration that transfers of estate properties to family trust void

    《霍利姆家族遗产争议:伊斯兰法律下的分配引发的法律风波》

    2023-11-13 MOORE
    Aitken PartnersHicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • WILLS AND ESTATESCourt authorisation for the making of a statutory willPropositus lacked testamentary capacityApplicant was the attorney for the propositus

    临终遗嘱之争:维多利亚州法庭拒绝为老年母亲制作法定遗嘱

    2023-08-10 GRAY
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYRelationship of approximately six and a half yearsSignificant acrimony and mistrust between the parties

    果断裁决!法庭支持丈夫 财产分配与配偶赡养费案掀波澜

    2023-07-25 KARI MELBOURNE

    根据这些命令,结算日期将从这些命令之日起计算35天。 在结算日期之前: 在这些命令发出之日起7天内,双方应采取一切必要行动,将前婚姻住所的销售收益(目前约为145,630美元)释放给妻子的律师信托账户。 在遵守这些命令的前提下,双方应保留各自的资产、资源和养老金权益,并独自擁有和控制。 双方应各自支付并完全全额赔偿对方的个别债务和责任。 尚未到达结算日期之前,丈夫应支付给妻子由于2020年3月6日的命令所欠的配偶赡养拖欠款项净额为5,400美元,以全额偿还。 其他命令:在结算日期之前,妻子应向丈夫支付B Valuers和M Pty Ltd在此诉讼中产生的专家费用的一半,丈夫有权从根据本命令2(a)向妻子支付的款项中扣除相同金额。 根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法》第121条规定,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法律诉讼的程序,并不得公开揭示相关人员、关联人员或证人的身份。 需要注意的是,根据澳大利亚1975年家庭法第121(9)(g)条的规定,法院已批准以匿名形式发布这个判决。

    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 75, 79, 117.
    查看案例摘要
  • ESTOPPELProprietary estoppelRepresentations allegedly made by parents to one son that farm would pass to himWhether representations ambiguous

    家庭纷争:兄弟为继承农场展开法庭争斗,承诺与信任的法律考验

    2023-05-29 BEACH
    Hicks Oakley Chessell WilliamsAndrews Legal Group Knox
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE COURTFreezing orderApplication by First Defendant made in caveat removal proceedingFreezing order sought to restrain net proceeds of sale

    《父子争产大戏:300万资产被冻结,背后有哪些隐秘交易?》

    2022-10-16 FORBES
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • WILLSSupreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic) r 54.02Construction of a willConditions of a clause of a will

    《遗嘱争夺战:兄弟间的产权意向与法院的最终裁决》

    2022-10-05 BARRETT ASJ
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • CONSUMER CREDITCredit protectionWhether loan agreement unenforceable by reason of s 39 of Consumer Credit (Victoria) Act 1995Whether loan agreement a ‘credit contract’ for purposes of Act

    《澳大利亚迷局:建筑公司破产引发的信用法律争端与无效票据之争》

    2022-08-29 MCLEISH
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • FAMILY LAWdefended threshold hearingleave to issue property proceedings after time limitdispute as to length of the relationship

    家庭法庭揭露情感纠葛:60岁男子获准超期提起财产诉讼!

    2022-08-03 O'SHANNESSY MELBOURNE

    根据1975年(澳大利亚联邦)家庭法案第44条第6款的规定,准予申请方与事实婚姻丈夫提出超时诉讼。 申请人于2022年3月9日提出的起诉申请将成为他寻求财产分割令的起诉申请。 被告于2022年4月6日提交的回应将成为她对申请人起诉申请的回应。 当事人和记录上的任何律师应遵循登记官召集会议与会方式的任何指示,包括亲自出席、通过Microsoft Teams或电话参加。 在开庭日期前至少14天,每一方必须:(a)确保依据《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021(澳大利亚)》第6章的要求已经完成交换文件;(b)确保已提交任何与诉讼相关的私人专家报告;(c)通过电子邮件向涉案管理人员(...@fcfcoa.gov.au)和对方提供一份单一的文件捆绑包,其中包括:(i)涉案方的机密案例概况(争议解决)(ii)被寻求订单的详细纪要;(iii)任何先前或当前家庭暴力令的详细信息;(iv)双方交换的与争议问题直接相关的任何文件的副本(并将相关部分突出显示);(v)任何财务资源的细节;(vi)任何财产估值或市场评估(其价值存在争议);(vii)适用的超级年金权益的报表和(如适用)估值;(viii)书面确认可能成为分割令对象的任何基金的受托人已获得程序公正。 如果达成和解,第7条的提及日期可以在调解会议上取消。 在调解会议之前,每位代表当事人的律师必须向其客户和其他当事人提供通知,指明该方是否收到了法律援助资金,并提供以下细节(如果没有):(a)当事方在诉讼中至今所发生的总费用和开支;(b)预计在剩下的每个阶段中将产生的预期费用;以及(c)最终听证会的预计持续时间和预期整个诉讼过程中的总费用和开支。 受影响的未代表当事方可以申请加入《共同家庭暴力和当事方质询计划》(“该计划”)以获得代表,但此类申请必须在最后听证会前至少12周提交。 根据1975年(澳大利亚联邦)家庭法案第121条,在非常有限的情况下,发布揭露个人、关联人或家庭法程序中的证人身份的诉讼是违法的。 值此注意,根据1975年(澳大利亚联邦)家庭法案第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院已批准以化名Mendez & Navarro发布本判决。

    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 44, 90SF, 90SM, 117
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSIntestacyJudicial adviceWhether costs recoverable out of the estate

    《争夺遗产:澳大利亚法庭裁定财产的共有权纷争》

    2022-05-17 GORTON
    Mills OakleyHicks Oakley Chessell WilliamsMazzeo Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • INTESTACYJudicial advicePropertyWhere deceased died intestate

    《遗产纠纷:夫妇财产究竟是共同拥有还是分开持有?法庭判例揭示背后的真相》

    2022-04-11 GORTON
    Mills OakleyHicks Oakley Chessell WilliamsMazzeo Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREApplication for summary dismissal on the basis the plaintiffs’ lack standing and procedural irregularityInterests of justice do not favour summary disposal of proceedingSupreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 22.16

    《亡妻遗产争夺战:丈夫与继子女的法律博弈》

    2022-03-16 IRVING ASJ
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • WILLS AND ESTATESInformal willApplication to admit informal will to probateWhere informal will executed prior to deceased’s hospital admission

    《遗嘱之争:志愿者的临终遗愿,法庭能否认可?》

    2022-01-31 MCMILLAN
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • MORTGAGESAssessment of interest that would have been paid by plaintiffs to substitute financier if tender had been accepted.DECLARATIONDeclaration sought by receivers about entitlement to indemnity

    建筑纠纷引发的权利之争:澳大利亚公司法庭判决曝光不当转让与侵权赔偿

    2021-09-26 RIORDAN
    Holding Redlich - MelbourneHicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • PROPERTY LAWCAVEATSApplication for removal of a caveat lodged on title to landWhether caveators have established a prima facie case for an interest in the land arising under an implied, resulting of constructive trust

    《墨尔本土地纠纷:信托之争背后的法律较量》 这个标题突出了案件的地点(墨尔本)和核心主题(信托争议),并营造出一种引人入胜的故事感。

    2020-11-16 DERHAM
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSWhere leave was granted to shareholders of a company in liquidation to bring a proceeding in the name of the companyWhere leave was granted exercising the inherent jurisdiction of the CourtWhether error in the exercise of the discretion to grant leave

    《澳大利亚破产纠纷:股东申请代表公司诉讼遭拒,法官判决引发法律解读风波》

    2020-10-11 SIFRIS
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • WILLS AND ESTATESApplication by trustee for orders barring potential claimants from future claims against the estateNotice served by emailWhether notice properly served

    《兄弟争产,法庭裁决锁定:死亡遗产的终结之战》

    2020-07-13 MCMILLAN
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSApplication to bring proceedings on behalf of company in liquidationDerivative actionInherent jurisdiction

    《破产争议:澳大利亚法院批准股东代表清算公司追索北墨尔本地产权益》

    2020-05-13 LYONS
    Hicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    查看案例摘要
  • 第 1 / 1 · 20 条