每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决，绝不杜撰判例。
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
以下是上述文本的中文概述： （1）驳回了于2018年5月21日提交的上诉申请，驳回了于2018年6月12日提交的两个上诉申请，驳回了于2018年6月29日提交的上诉申请。 （2）申请人应支付第二答辩人的费用，费用支付方式可协商达成一致，如果无法达成一致，则按评估进行支付。注意：这个命令的形式需要在法院的记录中登记。根据澳大利亚1975年家事法案第121（9）（g）条的规定，本法院批准将此判决以Callas＆Callas及其它人的笔名发布。注意：本法院的判决陈述副本可能会经过审查，以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误（澳大利亚2004年家事法规第17.02A条（b）），或者记录根据澳大利亚2004年家事法规第17.02条进行的订单变更。
第 2 / 2 · 29 条