Event and Time
Event Description
In the case of Monforte & Saunders, the applicant, Ms. Monforte, filed an application seeking a declaration that her relationship with the respondent, Mr. Saunders, constituted a "de facto relationship" under section 90RD of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). She sought property adjustment orders under section 90SM of the Act, which Mr. Saunders opposed, asserting that their relationship was merely one of dating without the requisite characteristics of a de facto relationship.
Application and Claims
- Applicant (Ms. Monforte) Claims:
- The relationship had the depth and commitment necessary to be considered a de facto relationship. - Evidence of public acknowledgment of their relationship, shared plans for the future, and intermingling of finances. - A request for property settlement based on this claimed status.
- Respondent (Mr. Saunders) Claims:
- The relationship did not reach the status of a de facto relationship but was instead limited to dating or a boyfriend-girlfriend arrangement. - There was no cohabitation or genuine domestic basis for their relationship. - Financial arrangements were primarily commercial and not indicative of a committed relationship.
Judicial Decisions
- The Court found in favor of the respondent, concluding that no de facto relationship existed between the parties.
- The application for property settlement under section 90SM was dismissed.
---
Dispute Points and Legal Basis
Dispute Points
- Claims by Ms. Monforte:
- Subjective belief of a committed relationship based on duration and future plans. - Participation in mutual activities, holidays, and discussions of living together. - Financial assistance provided by Mr. Saunders as an emotional commitment.