Event and Time
Event Description
In a family law appeal involving Ms. Chiou and Mr. Vien, Ms. Chiou sought an order for security for costs in relation to Mr. Vien's ongoing appeal against a previous court declaration that no de facto relationship existed between them after the initial relationship period ended in 2013. The case arose from a series of financial transactions and legal disputes, culminating in Ms. Chiou's application for the Court to require Mr. Vien to pay $20,000 to her solicitors as security for costs.
Application and Claims
- Applicant (Ms. Chiou):
- Sought an order for Mr. Vien to pay $20,000 to be held as security for potential costs related to his appeal. - Requested that the appeal be stayed until the security amount was paid. - Argued that Mr. Vien had previously failed to comply with a costs order in another court, indicating he might not be able to cover costs if she won her appeal.
- Respondent (Mr. Vien):
- Claimed he was impecunious (lacking funds), asserting he could not meet the demand for security. - Made attempts to delay the proceedings, claiming he was overseas during the hearing.
Judicial Decisions
The Court granted Ms. Chiou's application, ordering Mr. Vien to pay $20,000 as security for costs, to be placed in a controlled account. If he failed to comply, the appeal would be stayed until the payment was made.
---
Dispute Points and Legal Basis
Dispute Points
- Security for Costs:
- Ms. Chiou's argument centered around Mr. Vien's alleged failure to pay a previous costs order, suggesting risk regarding the recoverability of her costs if the appeal continued without security. - Mr. Vien contended he was unable to pay due to financial constraints, yet his undisclosed financial sources raised suspicions regarding his claim of impecuniosity.