Event and Time
Event Description
Mr. Goodhew filed for an assessment of permanent impairment under the Workers Compensation Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) after sustaining injuries while working at a daycare center. A compulsory conference was scheduled, but WorkCover indicated they would not attend, claiming Mr. Goodhew was not a worker under the Act. Consequently, Mr. Goodhew sought a court order to compel the conference to occur, while WorkCover sought a declaration that he was not a worker.
Application and Claims
- Mr. Goodhew:
- Applied for an assessment of permanent impairment following injuries. - Filed for the compulsory conference to proceed despite WorkCover's absence.
- WorkCover:
- Cross-applied for a declaration that Mr. Goodhew was not a worker under the Act and claimed that the Act did not apply to his damages claim.
Judicial Decisions
- WorkCover’s application for a declaration was dismissed.
- Mr. Goodhew’s application for the compulsory conference to proceed was granted.
Dispute Points and Legal Basis
Dispute Points
- Mr. Goodhew's Claims:
- Argues that he is a "worker" under the Act due to his injuries while assisting other workers at the daycare center. - Claims WorkCover is obliged to attend the compulsory conference as required by the Act.
- WorkCover's Arguments:
- Contends that Mr. Goodhew is not a "worker" but rather a contractor, which negates their obligation under the Act. - Asserts that their non-attendance at the compulsory conference was lawful based on their assessment of Mr. Goodhew's status.
- :