LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
13 cases linked to AR Conolly & Company Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
  • CONTRACTSformationagreementwhether parties entered into a binding agreement to settle these and related proceedings upon signing settlement document at mediation

    Court Confirms Binding Settlement Agreement, Despite Flaws in Deed Execution

    2023-07-06 Hon. Justice HENRY

已达成有约束力的和解协议。详情请见[187]–[190]。

AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Read case brief
  • TORTSinjurious falsehoodplaintiffs hold offices within Rural Fire Service Brigadesthree publications by other office holders within the Rural Fire Service comprising or relating to disciplinary complaints against the plaintiffs

    Rural Fire Service Leaders Face Defamation Battle: Allegations of Malicious Falsehoods Spark Legal Showdown

    2022-12-12 Hon. Justice ABADEE

    文本摘要:查看704 - 705段。 这两个段落提到了一个关于市场趋势的观点。首先,作者指出在最近几年中,市场趋势逐渐向新兴技术和创新的方向发展。然而,他们也提到,过度依赖某种技术或趋势可能会导致风险和不稳定性。此外,作者提到了摩尔定律在新兴技术领域的适用性和限制。最后,作者强调了市场趋势是一个动态过程,并且要不断观察和适应变化。 总之,这两个段落讨论了市场趋势的演变和对新兴技术的依赖,以及如何应对其中的风险和不确定性。

    AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 5D
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTStermsjoint venture to acquire and develop propertywhere joint venture agreement never reduced to writing

    Joint Venture Dispute: Court Weighs Credibility in Unwritten Agreement Over Blake Street Property

    2022-09-19 Hon. Justice HARRISON

    请参阅[61]和[62]。

    AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSApplication by Trustee in Bankruptcy seeking an order that the first respondent de facto husband pay the costs of an interlocutory application on an indemnity basis or in the alternative on a party and party basisOrder that the first respondent de facto husband pay the applicant Trustee in Bankruptcy’s costs from the 15 July 2020 on a party and party basis

    Court Orders De Facto Husband to Cover Costs in Lengthy Bankruptcy Dispute

    2022-03-28 Hon. Justice MCGUIRE HOBART

    要求实际上的被告丈夫Gazi先生支付申请人托管人Shellback先生为Strobel破产财产提出的临时申请的费用和相关费用,这些费用将按照2021年《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家事法院(家事法)规则》的规定进行协商或征税/评估,并根据当事人/当事人基础进行支付。 注意:该命令的形式需根据法院记录进行处理。 注意:根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家事法院(家事法)规则》第10.14(b)项和/或第10.13项的规定,本判决书经过审查可能会作出一些次要的排版或语法错误的修正,或者记录一项有关命令的变更。 根据1975年《家事法》第121条款,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家事法律程序中的人士、相关人士或证人的案件是犯罪行为。 特此注意,根据1975年《家事法》第121(9)(g)条款,本法院以Gazi&Strobel的化名发布此判决是经过批准的。

    Matthews Folbigg LawyersAR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117(2A)
    Read case brief
  • NEGLIGENCEdamageschallenge to award of damages made by primary judge to injured respondentwhether post

    Legal Battle Ends: Court Upholds $1.4 Million Damages Award in Workers' Compensation Case

    2021-12-15 Hon. Justice BELL P AT [1]

    2021/72965 处理结果:上诉驳回,需承担费用。2021/72975 处理结果:上诉驳回,需承担费用。

    AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYINJUNCTIONde facto relationship

    Court Denies Injunction in High-Stakes Property Battle: $40K Entity Secured Against De Facto Relationship Assets

    2021-11-25 Hon. Justice MCGUIRE LAUNCESTON

    以下是文本的中文摘要: 1. 申请人Gazi先生的禁令申请被驳回。 2. 第一被申请人信托人需从Ms Strobel的破产财产中信托款项中支付$40,798.09给第二被申请人。 3. 此事项将在2022年5月30日上午10:00开始由McGuire法官主持在澳大利亚联邦巡回法院和家庭法院的悉尼分院进行为期2天的庭审。各方需在庭审日期前不迟于7天内提交、申报和送达案件摘要文件。申请人Gazi先生需根据本院规则支付听证费用。此案进程将在2022年5月16日上午9:30在电话上由McGuire法官进行提及和核查。请拨打……然后输入密码……44#。 注意:该命令的形式受到法庭记录的限制。 注意:根据2021年联邦巡回法院和家庭法院(家事法)规则(Cth)第10.14(B)条或根据2021年联邦巡回法院和家庭法院(家事法)规则(Cth)第10.13条,本法庭对本判决书的抄本可能会进行审查以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误,或记录对命令的变更。 根据1975年澳大利亚家事法案(Cth)第121条款,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家事法律程序中的人物,相关人物或证人的诉讼信息是违法的。 请注意,根据1975年澳大利亚家事法案(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,本法庭以Gazi&Strobel的化名批准本判决的发布。

    Matthews Folbigg LawyersAR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79 and 90SM
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPleadingsStriking OutAbuse of process

    Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Motion, Orders Defendants to Cover Legal Costs Amid Delays

    2021-07-25 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    (1)原告的动议通知被驳回。(2)被告需要支付动议的费用。

    AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREplaintiff applied for judgment to be amended pursuant to the slip ruleRule 36.17 of the UCPRinadvertence of counsel

    Court Grants Reprieve: Plaintiff Wins $14,368 in Interest on Past Economic Loss!

    2021-06-20 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    根据《民事诉讼规则》第36.17条款,根据过去经济损失利息标准,判决将被修正,其中包括14,368.99美元。现在的判决金额将为1,435,339美元(向下取整)。

    AR Conolly & Company LawyersGillis Delaney Lawyers
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREStay of proceedingsPending appealPartial stay granted

    Legal Showdown: Court Grants Partial Stay in High-Stakes Appeal, Secures $900K for Plaintiffs!

    2021-05-20 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    2015/326714: 本文表示对原告威廉·安德鲁·凯利、威廉·理查德·凯利和玛格丽特·简·凯利作出判决,赔偿金额为238,026美元。此外,对该判决做出的执行停止令和对于2021年2月19日的第六项费用令也做出了停止令。 2016/74936: 本文表示对赔偿金额为670,971美元作出了执行停止令。此外,对于2021年2月19日的第四项和第五项费用令也做出了停止令。

    AR Conolly & Company LawyersGillis Delaney Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREApplication to separate the issue of quantum from liabilityWhere psychiatric condition of child plaintiffs not yet stabilisedWhether application fair in the circumstances

    Court Separates Liability and Damages in Heart-Wrenching Railway Tragedy Case

    2021-05-17 Hon. Justice CAMPBELL

    对于第一位和第二位原告,直接建议制定有关责任与损失量的问题的短时间安排。

    AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREservicedeemed or informal serviceelectronic service

    Legal Turmoil Over Notice to Admit: Court Rules Email Service Invalid, Sets Aside Key Admission in Rose Bay Property Dispute

    2021-03-11 Hon. Justice DAVIES

    以下是文本的中文概要: (1)日期为2020年10月20日的承认事实通知被撤销。 (2)原告需支付被告在动议通知上的费用。 (3)此案件从占有清单中移除。 (4)被告于2021年3月2日提出的动议通知和整个诉讼程序将于2021年3月19日移交至注册人名下的清单中。

    AR Conolly & Company Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • NEGLIGENCEworkplace injurythirdparty tortfeasor

    Major Victory in Workplace Injury Case: Plaintiff Awarded $1.4 Million Following Sheep-Unloading Incident

    2021-02-18 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    该判决决定以下情况:(1)对原告Ross Monteleone的裁决金额为1,435,339美元。(2)对原告William Andrew Kelly, William Richard Kelly和Margaret Jane Kelly的裁决金额待商议或确定。(3)反诉被驳回。(4)被告需支付反诉方的费用。(5)被告需支付原告Ross Monteleone的费用。(6)被告需支付原告William Andrew Kelly, William Richard Kelly和Margaret Jane Kelly的费用。

    AR Conolly & Company LawyersGillis Delaney Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5B
    Read case brief
  • EVIDENCEdocumentary evidencetender of documentsadmissibility

    Court Rules Key Witness Statement Admissible in Arm Injury Case

    2020-11-18 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    2020年11月19日,Dr Amy Kelly的声明被接纳。

    AR Conolly & Company LawyersGillis Delaney Lawyers
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 108
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 13 results