LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
19 cases linked to Bannermans Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Bannermans Lawyers
  • JURISDICTIONpartial strike out of Class 2 application as court lacks jurisdiction to consider breach of duty of care to provide support for land under s 177 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREpremature application for compensation under s 181 of Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) struck out

    Legal Strife Over Landslide Risks: Court Strikes Out Key Claims in Northern Beaches Council Case

    2024-02-21
Hon. Justice PAIN

文中提到了法官命令和尊敬的法官。

Bannermans Lawyers
Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 177
Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONDesign and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW)statutory duty under s 37application to amend Technology and Construction List Statement

    Court Denies Owners Corporation's Bid to Amend Case Against Brookfield in Major Little Bay Building Defects Dispute

    2023-11-20 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    拒绝允许对第一被告提出修正建筑技术清单陈述。

    Baker McKenzieBannermans Lawyers
    Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • LAND LAWStrata schemesAppointment of compulsory strata managerWhether grounds for compulsory appointment are established

    Strata Showdown: Court Appoints Network Strata Services for 12-Month Management

    2023-10-25 Hon. Justice G BLAKE AM

    网络层服务有限公司被任命为地契管理代理人,以履行第一被告的所有职能,期限为12个月。法院未就诉讼费用作出裁决。如果任何一方希望申请变更上述裁决,申请人必须在2023年11月9日之前提交诉讼费用申请,包括不超过三页的陈词和任何支持证据。被告必须在2023年11月23日前提交任何不超过三页的陈词和答辩证据。诉讼费用申请人必须在2023年11月30日前提交任何不超过两页的答辩陈词。相关各方必须在陈词中注明是否同意免除诉讼费用申请的口头听证会的命令,如果不同意,需要提交不超过一页的陈词,说明为何应当进行口头听证会而不是纸面裁定。如果没有免除听证会,各方将被告知诉讼费用申请听证会的日期。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 28, 29, 36, 52, 60, 71, Sch 4, cl 3
    Read case brief
  • LAND LAWStrata titleCivil penaltys 147 Strata Schemes Management Act 2015

    Strata Dispute: Homeowner Fined $1,320 for By-Law Breach in Landmark Case

    2023-08-29 Hon. Justice G SARGINSON

    法官命令被告Delmont Purcell在14天内向原告The Owners-Strata Plan No 84716支付$1,320。原告在14天内提交和对方提交相关文件,35天内提交回复文件。双方需在文件中说明是否同意对费用问题进行口头听证会,并在文件中说明为何需要口头听证会。根据双方的费用申请文件,法官可能决定是否需要进行口头听证会,或者直接根据文件作出决定。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • SENTENCEcontemptguilty pleafailure to comply with consent orders

    Court Slams Owners for Fire Safety Contempt: $11,250 Fine and Ongoing Monthly Penalties

    2023-07-27 Hon. Justice PRITCHARD

    The text provides no context or information to summarize.

    Bannermans LawyersPikes & Verekers Lawyers
    Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • LAND LAWstrata titleowners corporationmaintenance and repair of common property

    Court Rules in Favor of Owners Corporation as Smiths Miss Out on Rental Compensation Over Property Dispute

    2022-11-27 Hon. Justice MITCHELMORE

    起诉被驳回,并要求支付费用。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Local Court Act 2007 (NSW), s 39
    Read case brief
  • ENCROACHMENTss 2, 3 and 4 of Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922(NSW)characterisation of encroaching owner and adjacent owner

    Court Dismisses Encroachment Case: Homeowners Found to be the Real 'Encroaching Owners'

    2022-11-17 Hon. Justice DUGGAN

    The text discusses the role of the judge in issuing orders and maintaining order in the courtroom. It emphasizes the importance of judges' impartiality and commitment to upholding the law. The text also highlights the authority and responsibility of judges in ensuring fair and just proceedings.

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Encroachment of Buildings Act 1922 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSs 60 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)Special circumstancesWhether established

    Court Rules on Costs: Special Circumstances Unestablished in Latest Tribunal Decision

    2022-09-29 Hon. Justice G SARGINSON

    根据新南威尔士州2013年《民事行政法庭法案》第50(2)条,成本问题的口头听证会被豁免。成本申请被驳回。对成本的命令被取消。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONJoinder of party after expiration of limitation periodDate when claim lodgedWhether Tribunal has jurisdiction

    Court Strikes Down Attempt to Add Builder to Dispute: Jurisdiction Questions Aplenty

    2022-06-29 Hon. Justice GRAHAM ELLIS

    法院拒绝了加入Stadurn Pty Ltd作为被申请人的请求。这个申请被驳回,因为法庭根据1989年的《家庭建筑法案》没有管辖权。请求修改申请并在2020年的《设计和建筑从业者法案》下增加索赔的申请也被拒绝。在2022年7月11日星期一之前,提交不超过五页的书面声明和任何有关成本申请的支持证据。在2022年7月20日星期三之前,针对任何成本申请的响应提交不超过五页的书面声明和任何支持证据。在2022年7月27日星期三之前,提交不超过两页的回复书面声明。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • STRATA TITLEApplication for costsSpecial circumstancesClaim that has no tenable basis in fact or law

    Strata Dispute: Tribunal Dismisses Cost Claims in Landmark Ruling!

    2022-05-01 Hon. Justice D GOLDSTEIN

    根据2013年《民事和行政法庭法案》第50(2)条款,成本听证会被免除。在SC 21/24112案件中,业主- 组套计划97383的成本申请被驳回。每一方都必须自行承担成本。在SC 21/48501案中,CLSM Pty Ltd必须支付给业主- 组套计划97383诉讼费用,若费用在2014年《法律专业统一法律适用法案》所规定的情况下未被同意,则需评估。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSWhether special circumstances warranting an order for costsProportionality of costs to amount in issue considered

    Tribunal Rules: Parties to Bear Own Legal Costs in Landmark Decision

    2022-03-27 Hon. Justice GRAHAM ELLIS

    根据2013年的《民事和行政法院法案》第50(2)条款,法庭决定不举行关于费用问题的听证会。双方各自承担自己的费用。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • ESTOPPELproprietary estoppelencouragementnature of promise

    Legal Battle Over Pool Access: Strata Owners Win Landmark Estoppel Case

    2021-10-12 Hon. Justice BATHURST AT [1]

    1. Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700; Proceedings No 2021/102010 (1) 上诉被驳回。 (2) 要求上诉人支付上诉方的诉讼费用。 2. Trentelman v The Owners – Strata Plan No 76700; Proceedings No 2021/101998 (1) 上诉被驳回。 (2) 要求上诉人支付上诉方的诉讼费用。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (Qld)
    Read case brief
  • ASSET PRESERVATION ORDERno issue of principle.

    Court Upholds Freezing Order: Assets at Risk in Fraud Allegations Against Lotus and Qiu

    2021-08-01 Hon. Justice WILLIAMS

    在[54]处查看订单。

    Bannermans LawyersProject Lawyers
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 37A
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONclaim against builder and developer for building defectsclaim settled on date of hearingsettlement agreement

    Building Blunder: Strathfield Owners Corporation Claims Victory Against Builder and Developer for Flammable Cladding and Defects

    2021-07-26 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    原告有权利判决。

    Fortis LawBannermans Lawyers
    Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSparty/partyclaim based on alleged promises about future access to propertywhere plaintiff did not fully articulate a claim for proprietary estoppel before oral opening submissions and defendant obtained adjournment

    Court Ruling: Strata Dispute Ends in Complex Cost Orders

    2021-05-20 Hon. Justice PARKER

    请提供需要总结的具体文本内容,以便为您提供相应的汉语总结。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 12
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICEstay of execution pending appealappropriateness of interlocutory reliefappeal concedely reasonably arguable

    Court Denies Stay of Execution in Major Appeal Decision: Balance of Convenience Tips Against Appellant

    2021-04-18 Hon. Justice LEEMING

    1. 准许在提前通知2个工作日的情况下申请关于臨时制度的自由。 2. 驳回于2021年4月13日提交的动议通知书中的第2段。 3. 对于在2021年4月13日提交的动议通知书中的第2段的费用问题保留意见。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYestoppelproprietary estoppelpromise to give continued use of swimming pool

    Court Rules in Favor of Strata Residents: Easement Granted for Pool Access Amidst Legal Battle

    2021-04-05 Hon. Justice PARKER

    请查看[61]-[62]

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 88BA
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSPerformancedeed of settlementdeed between owners corporation and owner as a result of water damage to property and resulting mould and related illnesses

    Water Damage Woes: Court Orders Owners Corporation to Compensate for Rental Loss Amid Mould Crisis in Pyrmont Apartment

    2021-03-29 Hon. Justice SACKAR

    请参阅第[12] 和第[13] 段。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTformation and validityproposal by owner of development lots to convert lots into nonstrata blocks and build townhouses of specified height

    Court Rulings Ripple Through Strata: Pool Access Dispute Enters Legal Waters

    2021-02-25 Hon. Justice PARKER

    请参见332至336页。

    Bannermans Lawyers
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 54A
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 19 results