LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
20 cases linked to Beazley Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Beazley Lawyers
  • BANKING AND FINANCElender advances $3.25m secured by mortgage and guaranteesdefaultlender appoints receiver

High Court Rules in $1.15 Million Banking Dispute: Borrower and Guarantors Held Liable After Failed Property Sale

2023-05-15 Hon. Justice REES

驳回申请; 对原告判决。

Independent LegalBeazley Lawyers
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56 ,57, 58 62, 66
Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONshop top housing developmentheight of building contraventionwhether written request demonstrates sufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the contravention

    Court Dismisses Controversial Palm Beach Development: Height Violation Nixes $3M Mixed-Use Project

    2023-02-02 Hon. Justice WALSH

    法庭裁定如下:(1) 上诉驳回。 (2) 堪培拉自治领DA2021/2362号申请,在巴伦乔伊大道1105号和伊鲁卡大道4号(地块CP SP 87024和地块CP SP 87022)建造一幢带地下停车库的三层建筑,未获得同意。 (3) 除了保留展品1、A、B、D和E外,其余展品将退还。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 1.3, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTConstruction of loan agreementWhere vendor provided vendor financeWhere the precise loaned sum was disputed by the parties

    Court Rules in High-Stakes Loan Dispute: $1.4 Million Judgment Against Defendants

    2022-11-27 Hon. Justice PEDEN

    根据双方同意,法庭做出以下判决:(1)AS216078 注意事项应在被告向原告支付贷款欠款的全部金额之前延期。(2)第一被告有权在申请重新融资时与注意事项有关。法庭还判决如下:(1)被告需支付$1,442,161.88的判决金额。(2)从2018年5月15日起至支付判决金额时按6%的利率计算利息。(3)被告要以赔偿的方式支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • COSTSpartnership proceedingsdeparture from usual rule that costs follow the eventcosts of Inquiry commissioned to determine partners’ entitlement to misappropriated partnership funds

    Court Denies Costs in Intricate Family Partnership Dispute Over Misappropriated Funds

    2022-11-21 Hon. Justice EMMETT

    在案件编号2005/266284和案件编号2017/325815中,裁决不按照费用顺序支付费用。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITYContract of guaranteeEnforcementFactors affecting validity of guarantee

    Iconic Restaurateur's Legacy Tested: Court Upholds $1.1 Million Loan Guarantee Amid Unconscionability Claims

    2022-11-03 Hon. Justice KUNC

    根据原告的诉讼请求做出判决,反诉被驳回。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersBeazley Lawyers
    Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 2001 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWENFORCEMENTWhere final orders had been made in April 2020Where the husband sought that the wife pay her half share of the funds incurred in ensuring compliance with the orders

    Court Orders Balance of Power in Family Law Dispute: Husband to Receive Payments, Wife Awarded Interest

    2022-09-05 Hon. Justice SCHONELL SYDNEY

    在这些命令的日期之内的7天内,被申请人妻子(“妻子”)应支付给申请人丈夫(“丈夫”)的银行账户(BSB...账号...45)总额为2,533美元,根据2020年4月30日最终财产命令第6条的规定,扣除丈夫支付给妻子的利息。丈夫的请求获得赔偿成本被驳回。请注意:命令的形式受法庭记录的影响。请注意:本法院判决原因的副本可能会根据《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021(联邦)》的规定(第10.14(b)节)进行修正,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或者以记录订单的变化(根据第10.13 联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021(联邦))进行检查。根据1975年(Cth)《家庭法案》第121条款规定,除非在极有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法案的诉讼并识别相关人员、关联人员或证人是违法行为。需要注意的是,根据1975年(Cth)《家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院批准以Farnell&Farnell的化名发布此判决。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 117, 117B
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSwinding up in insolvencypresumed insolvency from failure to comply with statutory demanddiscretion to dismiss or adjourn winding up application

    Court Orders Winding Up of Macarthur Projects: A Legal Battle Over Insolvency and Construction Disputes

    2022-05-24 Hon. Justice PARKER

    条件分布关注模型被广泛应用于自然语言处理任务中。在这样的模型中,给定输入序列X,通过建模输出序列Y与输入序列的条件分布P(Y|X)来解决不同的任务。条件分布关注模型通过考虑输入序列中不同位置的信息来生成输出序列。这些模型可以使用神经网络的编码器-解码器架构来实现。通过编码将输入序列转换为固定长度的向量,然后解码器基于这个向量生成输出序列。这种模型的一个优点是可以处理可变长度的输入和输出序列。在许多任务中,条件分布关注模型已经取得了很好的性能,并在机器翻译、语音识别等领域得到了广泛应用。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersBeazley Lawyers
    Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999
    Read case brief
  • GUARANTEE AND INDEMNITYconstruction of contract of guaranteecreditor’s claim was a claim in debt for a liquidated sum as distinct from a claim for damages for breach of contractdistinction important as principles of mitigation only apply to the latter

    Court Rules in Favor of Hill Foundation: Guarantor Ordered to Pay Over $533,000 Amid Controversial Claims

    2022-05-02 Hon. Justice MACFARLAN

    (1)在7天内命令希尔基金会计算根据本判决所应获得的适当金额,并通知第一被告和法庭该金额。 (2)如果沃克女士愿意,给予她进一步3个工作日的回复期限。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100(1)
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYtrusts and trustees

    Court Orders Resolution in Partnership Trust Dispute: Administrator Given Strict Timelines to Finalize Costs and Distributions

    2022-03-22 Hon. Justice EMMETT

    下列为中文总结: 1. 要求管理人员在7天内提供简要记录,以执行所有会议中达成的结论。 2. 要求原告在此后的14天内提交并送达有关费用的陈述。 3. 要求被告在进一步的14天内提交回应陈述。 4. 要求原告在进一步的7天内,如果希望的话,提交回复陈述。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSstatutory demandbased on nonpayment of judgment debt under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)

    Court Rules Against Development Manager in Disputed Statutory Demand Case

    2021-12-28 Hon. Justice REES

    解除撤销法定要求的申请。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersBeazley Lawyers
    Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), ss 13, 25
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYtrusts and trusteesadministrator’s costsentitlement to indemnification for costs incurred in defence of claim

    Trustee's Defense Costs Earn Indemnification: Court Rules on Administrator’s Remuneration Rights!

    2021-12-07 Hon. Justice EMMETT

    请提供正文以便进行翻译。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Trustee Act 1925 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSWinding upStatutory demandGenuine dispute about existence or amount of debt

    Court Clears Path for Macarthur Projects: Statutory Demands by Creditor Set Aside in Debt Dispute

    2021-11-23 Hon. Justice BLACK

    债权人的法定要求被撤销。被告需支付申请的费用。

    Beazley Lawyers
    - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 206D, 459H
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYPayment received from partnership fundWhether plaintiffs should account for paymentNature of payment

    Court Rules: $25,000 Payment to Geoffrey a Complex 'Loan' Dilemma in Partnership Dispute

    2021-10-27 Hon. Justice EMMETT

    请参见决定的第13段。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYgeneral principles and maximsequality is equitycalculation of final distribution of estate

    Court to Decide Fate of Partnership Funds in Lengthy Estate Dispute

    2021-09-29 Hon. Justice EMMETT

    请参阅第42段。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 100
    Read case brief
  • COSTSParty/PartyWhere no determination on the merits.

    Legal Tangle Over Creditors: Court Dismisses Costs Appeal in Shinetec vs. Rockpower Showdown

    2021-09-14 Hon. Justice BLACK

    未作出有关费用的命令。

    Beazley Lawyers
    - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98
    Read case brief
  • COSTSproceedings resolved by consent orders made against first defendant after first defendant capitulated to plaintiff’s claimsno substantive order made against second defendantplaintiff sought costs orders against both defendants

    Court Rules on Costs: First Defendant Held Liable, Second Defendant Escapes Burden in Major Corporate Dispute

    2021-06-02 Hon. Justice WILLIAMS

    在文本中点击[11]查看订单。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYtrusts and trusteestrust powerspowers of appointment

    Court Upholds Trustee Changes Amid Claims of Fraud in High-Stakes Trust Dispute

    2021-04-14 Hon. Justice BRERETON AT [1]

    要求上诉被驳回并承担费用。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 601AB
    Read case brief
  • ESTOPPELAnshun estoppeldecisions to which applicabletwo proceedings

    Justice Delayed: Landmark Ruling Addresses Fiduciary Misconduct and Estoppel in Controversial Partnership Dispute

    2021-03-03 Hon. Justice EMMETT

    以下是对文本的中文摘要: 1. 第一被告在2005/262284和2017/325815诉讼案件中提交简短的庭令,反映这些理由的结论。 2. 第一被告在这些理由公布后的14天内向2005/262284和2017/325815诉讼案件的所有其他当事方提供简短的庭令。 3. 任何一方对第一被告提出的命令提出异议的,在收到简短的庭令后的14天内以书面形式说明异议的性质和理由。 4. 为了解决有关命令争议并作出最终命令,将在2021年4月15日安排2005/262284和2017/325815诉讼案件的指令。 5. 如果在计算假设的补偿和分配中出现困难,保留给2005/262284和2017/325815诉讼案件的各方申请的权限。

    Beazley Lawyers
    Limitation Act 1969 (NSW), s 15, 47
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALPROPERTYAPPOINTMENT OF RECEIVERS

    Court Overturns Receiver Appointment in High-Stakes Family Trust Dispute

    2016-07-20 Hon. Justice RYAN SYDNEY

    以下是文本的中文摘要: (1) 修改审讯记录,将第二个上诉人的名字改为C Pty Limited。 (2) 允许上诉人上诉。 (3) 允许上诉,并撤销Cleary J于2016年7月21日作出的第1至第10项命令。 (4) 驳回于2016年5月18日提交的有关任命接管人的案件。 (5) 指示任何寻求费用命令的当事方在28天内提交并送达有关费用的任何意见书。对于寻求费用命令的被申请人,其需要在另外的28天内提交并送达对费用的任何答辩意见书。 注意:该命令的形式受到命令在法庭记录中的登录的限制。特此注意,根据1975年(Cth)法律法的第121(9)(g)条的规定,法院已经批准以D Pty Ltd和其他人和Sadler和其他人的化名为由本法院发布本判决。注意:本法院作出的该判决理由的副本可能根据2004年(Cth)家庭法规则第17.02A(b)条对次要的排版或语法错误进行审查,并根据2004年(Cth)家庭法规则第17.02条记录对命令的变化。

    Matthews Folbigg LawyersHicksons LawyersArnold LawyersBeazley Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALCOSTSWhere the appellant companies seek their costs of the appeal

    Court Rules Against Cost Claims in Family Legal Battle: Wife's Financial Struggles Underlined

    2016-07-20 Hon. Justice RYAN SYDNEY

    文本简述:(1) 上诉人申请要求第一被上诉人妻子支付上诉费用被驳回。 注意:订单的形式需在法庭记录中输入。 根据《1975年(联邦)家庭法案》(第121(9)(g)款),本法院已获得首席大法官的批准,以 D Pty Ltd和Sadler及其对手为化名进行本判决的发布。 注意:该法院通过《2004年(联邦)家庭法规章》(第17.02A(b)款)对该判决理由副本进行审查,以纠正轻微的排印或语法错误,或记录根据《2004年(联邦)家庭法规章》(第17.02款)对命令进行的变更。

    Matthews Folbigg LawyersHicksons LawyersArnold LawyersBeazley Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 20 results