LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
27 cases linked to Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
  • TAXES AND DUTIESincome taxcollection and recovery of taxunpaid tax liabilities and penalties

    Tax Titan: Court Orders $24.4 Million Liability Against Businesswoman in Landmark Ruling

    2024-09-05
Hon. Justice N ADAMS
Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), ss 161(1), 166, 167, 170, 173, 174(1), 175, 175A(1)
Read case brief
  • PROCEDUREform of orderscostsgeneral rule that costs follow the event

    Court Rules on $364,000 Tax Dispute: Liquidator's Costs Decisions Follow Key Judgment

    2024-09-03 Hon. Justice BLACK
    Macpherson KelleyCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(1)
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSWinding upApplication by liquidator for directionsWhether liquidator is justified in retaining or repaying certain monies

    Court Rules Liquidator Must Repay Millions to Tax Office Following Pivotal Mistake

    2024-08-11 Hon. Justice BLACK
    Macpherson KelleyCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth), s 195-1
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYApplication for review of sequestration order made by Registrarwhether bankruptcy notice was served on debtorbankruptcy notice served

    Tax Troubles Lead to Sequestration: Court Upholds Order Against Businessman Fayad Amidst $41M Debt Dispute

    2024-07-16 Hon. Justice MANOUSARIDIS SYDNEY
    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 8AAB, 14ZY, 14ZZ(1)(a)(i), Sch 1 ss 280-100, 350-10(2), Pt IVC
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEEDUREWhere an application is made to release the parties from a Harman undertakingWhere both parties consent to the release of filed material

    Court Relieves Couple from Harman Undertaking: Path Cleared for Discovery in Ongoing Property Dispute

    2024-07-15 Hon. Justice ALTOBELLI SYDNEY
    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) s 5
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision by the Immigration Assessment Authority (“IAA”) affirming refusal of a protection visawhether the IAA’s reasoning was legally unreasonable or irrationalapplication dismissed

    Justice Denied: Court Upholds Refugee Visa Rejection for Iraqi Arrivals

    2023-12-05 Hon. Justice LAING SYDNEY

    "请求驳回。注:命令的形式取决于法院记录中的条目。注:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误(根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2分部)(一般联邦法律)规则2021(Cth)第17.05(2)(g)),或记录根据第17.05法院规则2021(Cth)对命令的变更。"

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • APPEALspecial federal mattersexclusive jurisdiction of federal courtswhether appeal involved a matter “arising under” a Scheduled Commonwealth Act

    Court Slams Door on Vexatious Appeal: Riva and Ferella Ordered to Bear Costs in Legal Showdown

    2023-10-04 Hon. Justice ADAMSON

    法官拒绝申请人申请上诉2022年2月22日Kunc法官的判决和2022年3月4日进入的命令。命令申请人在本法庭支付被申诉人的费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPartiesVexatious litigantsLeave to institute proceedings

    Court Slams Vexatious Claims: Riva NSW Pty Ltd Faces Costs After Motion Dismissal

    2023-07-26 Hon. Justice BLACK

    据澳大利亚法院文件显示,要求驳回动议,由Riva NSW Pty Ltd和Ferella先生承担一般性基础的费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 1.12, 36.15
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYMatter settledapplication for costsrelevant considerations.

    Bankruptcy Battle: Court Rules Both Parties to Foot Their Own Bills in Costly Dispute

    2023-06-22 Hon. Justice CAMERON SYDNEY

    The court orders that the costs of the proceeding be borne by the parties themselves.

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 32
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSWinding upStatutory demandApplication to set aside

    Court Sets Aside Controversial Statutory Demand in Debt Dispute Between PSR and Capers

    2023-03-19 Hon. Justice BLACK

    债权人的法定要求被撤销,各方将就费用进行听证。

    Coleman Greig LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Business and Commerce Code (Texas)
    Read case brief
  • LAND LAWpossession of landwhere one registered proprietor made bankruptwhere no defence to claim

    Court Rules for Possession: Bankrupt Estate Sells Off Randwick Property

    2022-10-19 Hon. Justice DAVIES

    根据新南威尔士统一民事诉讼规则2005年第7.15(3)规定,新南威尔士受托人和监护人应被任命为第二被告的监护人。 根据新南威尔士统一民事诉讼规则2005年第7.14(2)规定,只要新南威尔士受托人和监护人的律师负责处理案件,第二被告的监护人不需要通过律师进行诉讼。 原告对该位于新南威尔士兰德维克1/21 Marcel Avenue, Randwick, NSW 2031土地的拥有权判决。 原告获准发出执行法院判决的强制执行令。 第一被告需支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.14, 7.15
    Read case brief
  • COSTSdeparture from usual ruleplaintiff a purchaser under a contract for sale with second defendant vendorsale at a price below market value

    Court Rules on Cost Dispute: Vendor Pays for Claim Success while Purchaser Foots Bill for Caveat Removal

    2022-10-11 Hon. Justice DARKE

    第二被告要支付原告关于索要具体执行的费用。原告要支付第一和第三被告关于解除财产限制令的费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74MA
    Read case brief
  • REAL PROPERTYcaveatswithdrawal of caveatsapplication pursuant to section 74MA of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)

    Court Ruling Unravels Property Dispute: Caveats Lifted on Yowie Bay Sale, Conditional on Payment

    2022-09-13 Hon. Justice DARKE

    该文涉及到要求就土地出售合同的特定履行制定命令,以及撤回留置权的命令,但前提是必须将一定金额的款项支付至法院。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74F, s 74MA
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPartiesVexatious litigantsDeclaration of

    Court Orders Vexatious Stay in Protracted Ferella Family Legal Battle

    2022-02-21 Hon. Justice KUNC

    将会继续进行,并将颁布禁令。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONApplication for protection visascountry information relied upon to make adverse credibility findings against applicantswhere corroborating evidence only acceptable if credibility of applicants was accepted

    Court Upholds Refugee Rejection: Nigerian Family's Asylum Bid Dismissed Amid Credibility Concerns

    2022-02-09 Hon. Justice EGAN

    总结以下文本内容:1. 将第一被申请人的名称修改为“移民、公民、移民服务和多元文化事务部长”。 2. 2021年10月18日提交的修订申请被驳回。 3. 申请人支付第一被申请人与复审申请相关的费用,经双方同意,若无法达成一致,费用将由法庭评估。 注:判决的形式取决于法庭记录的输入。 注:根据《2021年联邦巡回法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭(第2分区)(一般联邦法)规则》,法庭可以修改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正次要的印刷或语法错误(第17.05(2)(g)条),或根据第17.05条记载判决的变更。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.36(2)(a), (aa) and (2A), 499 Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees Ministerial Direction No.56
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSwinding upcompany liable to pay tax estimates of $4.9 millioncompany fails to revoke estimate

    Tax Tussle: Court Reduces $4.9 Million Demand by $230,000 for Priority Matters Pty Ltd

    2022-02-08 Hon. Justice REES

    根据需求变化,从490万美元降至467万美元,原告需支付费用。

    Gibson Howlin LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYCOSTSWhere orders made affirming orders made by registrarwhere orders made dismissing an application for review

    Court Orders Costly Consequences: Applicant to Pay $28,328.85 in Bankruptcy Case Ruling

    2021-12-22 Hon. Justice A KELLY MELBOURNE

    申请人需支付被申述方的费用,金额为$28,328.85。 注意:判决书的形式应符合法院记录的规定。 注意:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规第2部分》(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05(2)(g)),或者根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规第2部分》(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05记录对命令的变更。

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYapplication to set aside bankruptcy noticeapplication to extend time within which to comply with bankruptcy noticewhere parties engaged in protracted litigation

    Court Ruling Ends Prolonged Bankruptcy Drama: Debtor's Appeals Hit Another Wall

    2021-10-05 Hon. Justice A KELLY

    根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》(以下简称《法院法》)第202-203节的规定,直接允许各方以视频和音频链接的方式在法庭上出庭并发表意见。 对于于2021年9月10日提起的复议申请,驳回该申请。 确认于2021年8月19日作出的第2段命令。 驳回延长履行于2021年5月27日发出的破产通知的时间的申请。 在2021年10月12日星期二下午4点前,各方提交并交付关于本申请费用的任何意见,包括其中的金额(不超过三页)。 任何有关费用的申请将在书面上决定。 注:该命令的形式须根据法院记录进行记录。 注:本判决理由的副本可能经过审查以纠正小的排版或语法错误(根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》第17.05(2)(g)条款规定),或记录根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》第17.05条款对命令的变更。

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 30, 40, 41, 52 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 180 Legal Profession Act 2004
    Read case brief
  • TAXATIONalleged debts to the Australian Taxation Officedefendant accepted that a company of which he was a director had failed to pay taxation liabilities relating to withholding tax and superannuation guarantee obligationswhether the director took all reasonable steps to cause the company to comply with its taxation obligations

    Court Rules Against Director: Tax Debt Blamed on Leadership Failures in Collapsed Company

    2021-06-22 Hon. Justice DICKER SC

    对原告做出判决。双方必须根据这些理由,在七天内就同意的命令达成一致。如果没有达成协议,授权接洽副法官Dicker DCJ将案件重新列入进一步审理。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • INCOME TAXCollection and recoveryProceedings for recoveryGenuine dispute of debt

    Tax Showdown: Court Orders Patrizia Hubbard to Pay $3.08 Million in Unpaid Tax Liabilities

    2021-04-29 Hon. Justice HARRISON ASJ

    判决:被告需向原告支付3,084,394.06美元。法院命令如下:(1)被告需以普通方式支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 204
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSvoluntary administrationATO largest creditor, owed $2.6mATO votes against DOCA

    Court Orders ATO to Repay $2 Million for Tax Payment Missteps in Corporate Insolvency Case

    2021-03-11 Hon. Justice REES

    债权人被命令向清算员偿还200万美元的可撤销交易金额,并支付费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSexaminations relating to insolvencywhether time for application to set aside examination summons should be extended

    Court Upholds Liquidator's Examination: Extension of Time Denied for Insolvency Challenge

    2021-02-18 Hon. Justice BLACK

    拒绝延长申请废除审查传票的时间。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSwinding upwhere company in liquidationwhere company hired aircraft from creditor

    Court Rules $57K Payment to Stand, Shuffles Liquidation Deck for Skypac Aviation

    2020-11-30 Hon. Justice GLEESON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Companies Act 1961 (Cth), s 227
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREInterim preservationFreezing ordersAgainst third parties

    Court Upholds Freezing Orders as Tax Debts Loom Over Cordina Family's Trust Fund

    2020-11-17 Hon. Justice BLACK

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 180, 588FDA, 588FG, 1317S
    Read case brief
  • 12›

    Page 1 of 2 · 27 results