LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
6 cases linked to Crisp Law · sorted by most recent
Firm:Crisp Law
  • APPEALScostsconsequential ordersno question of principle

    Court Overturns District Ruling: Defendant Reclaims Over $591K in Landmark Appeal

    2024-02-11 Hon. Justice MEAGHER

    法官命令在2023年8月18日及2023年10月3日的法庭命令1、2和4被撤销。代之,裁定原告败诉。被告需按照2022年11月17日的《公司安排契约书》中规定的信托条款偿还原告591,308.52美元。另外,被告需支付原告从2023年10月23日至2024年2月2日间的利息,金额为16,808.01美元。一审程序费用需退还给地方法院。

    Crisp Law
Chamberlains Law Firm
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), s 15(2)(a)(i)
Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONPayment claim requirementsWhere alleged payment claim consisted of letter from solicitors and attached invoicesWhere correspondence between attached invoices and earlier submitted payment claims

    Legal Showdown: Court Rules on Payment Claims in Building Industry Dispute

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice MEAGHER AT [1]

    法官允许上诉并支付成本。双方必须在2024年2月2日或之前提交简要法官命令的文件,以便对上诉结果采取进一步措施。

    Crisp LawChamberlains Law Firm
    Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONContractRecourse to unconditional bank guaranteesApplication by contractor for interlocutory injunction to restrain recourse to security

    Court Refuses Contractor's Bid to Block Work Security Calls in High-Stakes Aged Care Facility Dispute

    2023-05-31 Hon. Justice BALL

    (1)原告应向被告支付2023年5月26日提出的临时禁令申请的费用,费用以赔偿方式计算; (2)该诉讼案件将推迟到2023年6月9日进行审理。

    Crisp LawSparke Helmore Lawyers
    Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law
    Read case brief
  • COSTSindemnity costswhether plaintiffs maintained proceedings having no reasonable prospects of success

    Court Orders Plaintiffs to Foot Indemnity Bill After Unsuccessful Pursuit Against Double Bay Bowling Club

    2021-08-12 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    原告需要按照无限责任方式支付第一被告的费用。

    Crisp LawKennedys
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONstatutory duty under s 177 not to do something that removes support from supporting land to supported landallegation that vibrations from work on supporting land caused removal of support by supporting land to supported landwhere proposed Technology and Construction List Statement did not allege facts that if proved would show how vibrations removed such support

    Court Dismisses Homeowners' Case Against Double Bay Club Over Construction Damage: Statutory Duty Claims Fall Short

    2021-07-19 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    首要被告提交修正的技术和建筑清单声明被拒绝,诉讼对首要被告的部分驳回,并要求首要被告支付诉讼费用。

    Crisp LawKennedys
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPleadingsAmendmentApplication to amend Technology and Construction List Statement

    Court Denies Plaintiffs' Request to Amend Construction Case Statement: Lack of Specificity Cited

    2021-03-25 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    拒绝允许修订科技和建筑清单声明。

    Crisp Law
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 6 results