LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
3 cases linked to Culshaw Bishop Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Culshaw Bishop Lawyers
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSWhere the respondent sought that the primary judge recuse herself from hearing the proceedingsWhere the application was listed for hearing on 6 September 2023

    Court Orders Mother to Pay $25K in Costs After 'Meritless' Recusal Bid

    2023-11-02 Hon. Justice KARI ADELAIDE

法庭判定2023年8月13日被告提交的修改申请书中第1(a)段被驳回。 被告须支付申请人荒废的费用,金额为25000美元,并须在这些命令颁布后的60天内支付至Culshaw Bishop Lawyers信托账户。 注意:该命令的形式需经法庭记录确认。 注意:此判决理由的副本可能会因修正轻微排版或语法错误(联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法律)规则2021年(联邦)第10.14(b)条)或根据第10.13条进行的命令变更而受到审查。 根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法》第121条规定,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法诉讼的相关人员或证人的审判是违法的。 特此声明,根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法》第121(9)(g)条的批准,本法庭以Garwood & Shipton化名发布该判决。

Culshaw Bishop LawyersAngela Ferdinandy
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 4AA, 102NA, 117
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREEx tempore reasonsWhere the respondent mother’s case outline document was filed at 11.53 am and the hearing was scheduled to commence at 11.30 am

    Justice Denies Mother's Last-Minute Case Outline in Family Court Ruling: A Lesson in Procedural Fairness

    2023-09-14 Hon. Justice KARI ADELAIDE

    ADC 4995 of 2018 is a legal case involving a dispute that was heard in court. The judge issued an order in response to the case.

    Culshaw Bishop LawyersAngela Ferdinandy
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWEXTEMPORE REASONSWhere the father no longer presses his application for parenting orders

    Court Closes Chapter on Lengthy Family Dispute: Father Withdraws Parenting Orders

    2023-03-15 Hon. Justice KARI ADELAIDE

    在2022年11月28日,父亲提交的第四次修订回应以及母亲于2023年3月14日提交的第五次修订申请均被驳回。 整个程序包括有关费用问题都被视为结束并被驳回。 注意:法院记录条目可能会影响判决书的形式。 注意:该判决书的副本可能会经过审核,以纠正一些小的排印或语法错误(《2021年联邦法院和家事法院(家庭法)规定》10.14(b)款),或记录根据《2021年联邦法院和家事法院(家庭法)规定》10.13 款对判决书的变更。 根据1975年《家庭法案》第121条(澳大利亚法庭法案),除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法律诉讼中的人物、相关人物或证人的诉讼是违法的。 需要注意的是,根据1975年《家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条,法院通过化名批准发布这一判决书的行为。

    Culshaw Bishop Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 3 results