LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
3 cases linked to Curtis Associates · sorted by most recent
Firm:Curtis Associates
  • NEGLIGENCELiabilityTrip hazardFootpath protrusion

    Elderly Pedestrian Wins $39K Compensation after Tripping on Faulty Footpath Slab

    2023-02-28 Hon. Justice MONTGOMERY

    (1)原告针对被告判决赢得胜诉,被告需要支付金额为39,015.75美元。 (2)被告需支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Curtis Associates
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3, 5B, 5D, 5E, 5R, 5S 16, 18
Read case brief
  • LAND LAWTorrens titleExceptions to indefeasibilityOverriding statutes

    Legal Landmark: Court Ruling on Torrens Title and Retirement Villages Act Paves New Paths for Land Rights

    2021-05-06 Hon. Justice WARD IN EQ

    根据[117]的指示进行订单

    Curtis AssociatesDWF
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 568D
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALCOSTSWhere the respondent made a Calderbank offer

    Family Law Appeal: Court Upholds Husband’s Claims in Cost Dispute After Calderbank Offer Confusion

    2019-09-10 Hon. Justice STRICKLAND ADELAIDE

    (1) 上诉被允许。 (2) 2019年9月6日作出的命令被撤销,被告妻子于2019年7月26日提交的申请和于2019年9月3日修订后提交的申请被驳回。 (3) 法院根据1981年《联邦诉讼(费用)法案》(Cth)第9条的规定,授予上诉方丈夫费用证书,即法院认为愿意由总检察长根据该法案向上诉方丈夫支付上诉相关费用的证书。 (4) 法院根据1981年《联邦诉讼(费用)法案》(Cth)第6条的规定,授予被告方妻子费用证书,即法院认为愿意由总检察长根据该法案向被告方妻子支付上诉相关费用的证书。 注意:订单的形式取决于该命令在法院记录中的记录。根据《1975年家庭法案》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条的规定,法院批准本判决以Paradin&Paradin化名发布。注意:本判决原因的副本可能经过审查,以纠正轻微的排印或语法错误(《2004年家庭法规》(Cth)第17.02A(b)规定),或根据《2004年家庭法规》(Cth)第17.02规定记录对订单的变更。

    Lander & RogersCurtis Associates
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 3 results