LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
5 cases linked to Everingham Solomons Solicitors · sorted by most recent
Firm:Everingham Solomons Solicitors
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWimposition of pecuniary penaltiesrelevant principlesparticular factual circumstances taken into account

    Court Orders Significant Penalties for Unpaid Wages: A Wake-Up Call for Employers in Australia

    2023-06-22 Hon. Justice EGAN

    第一被告需在2023年7月21日之前向Ellem Warren Napa Lawyers Solomons Legal支付39960.00澳元的罚款。 第四被告需在2023年7月21日之前向Ellem Warren Napa Lawyers Solomons Legal支付7992.00澳元的罚款。 注意:这些指令已根据《2021年联邦法庭和家庭法庭法规(2部分)(总机联邦法律)规则》第17.05(2)(e)条进行了修订。 注意:法庭可能会根据《2021年联邦法庭和家庭法庭法规(2部分)(总机联邦法律)规则》第17.05(2)(g)条修正或撤销判决或指令,以纠正次要的打字或语法错误,或者根据《2021年联邦法庭和家庭法庭法规(2部分)(总机联邦法律)规则》第17.05条记录指令的变更。

Everingham Solomons Solicitors
Ellem Warren Napa Lawyers
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss. 45, 323, 536, 550 and 557.
Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONproposed flood mitigation workswhether proposed works are acceptable having regard to the matters in section 166C(1) of the Water Act 1912.

    Court Greenlights Flood Mitigation Works in Gunnedah: Landmark Approval for ‘Bareese’ and ‘Golden Acres’

    2022-08-14 Hon. Justice CHILCOTT

    法院命令:(1)上诉被支持;(2)关于位于Gunnedah南约30公里处Curlewis的Wondobah Road上的“Bareese”和“Golden Acres”的地产所提出的作品1、2和3的申请编号90CW811054,经批准,但须遵守本判决书附件“A”中提供的批准声明和“批准作品计划-90CW811054(90FW837070)”;(3)除了保留的陈列品A、B、R1-1、R1-2、R2-4、R2-5以外,其余展品均归还。

    HUK Legal Services Pty LtdEveringham Solomons Solicitors
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONproposed flood mitigation workswhether proposed works are acceptable having regard to the matters in section 166C(1) of the Water Act 1912.

    Flood Mitigation Works Approved: Court Navigates Water Management Dispute in Curlewis

    2022-07-07 Hon. Justice CHILCOTT

    The text asks the reader to refer to a specific direction for further information.

    HUK Legal Services Pty LtdEveringham Solomons Solicitors
    Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s39
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSformation of contractsintention to be boundplaintiffs as purchasers and defendant as vendor signed front page of standard form contract for sale of land

    Family Feud Over Myoora: Court Rules on Binding Land Sale Amidst Legal Drama

    2021-10-05 Hon. Justice DARKE
    Everingham Solomons Solicitors
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 60
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALEVIDENCEWhether the appellant’s evidence of family violence was properly taken into account by the primary judge

    Family Law Victory: Court Overturns Property Ruling Amidst Evidence Controversy

    2015-03-29 Hon. Justice MAY SYDNEY

    1) 许可上诉。 2) 废除Terry法官于2015年3月30日作出的命令,并将诉讼转交给澳大利亚联邦巡回法院,由Terry法官之外的法官重新审理。 3) 法院根据《1981年联邦诉讼(费用)法案》第9条授予上诉的妻子费用证书,该证书认为上诉方在上诉方面的费用应由总检察长根据该法案授权支付。 4) 法院根据《1981年联邦诉讼(费用)法案》第6条授予被上诉的丈夫费用证书,该证书认为被上诉方在上诉方面的费用应由总检察长根据该法案授权支付。 5) 法院根据《1981年联邦诉讼(费用)法案》第8条授予各方费用证书,该证书认为各方在相关新审判中所发生费用应由总检察长根据该法案授权支付。 注意:该命令的形式取决于记录在法院档案中。据悉,根据《1975年家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条的规定,由该法院以“布里特和布里特”为化名批准发布此判决。 注意:本判决理由的副本可能会经过审核,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据《2004年家庭法官规则》第17.02A(b)条),或者记录依据《2004年家庭法官规则》第17.02条修订命令的变化。

    Everingham Solomons Solicitors
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 5 results