LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
5 cases linked to Hazan Hollander · sorted by most recent
Firm:Hazan Hollander
  • CONTRACTConstructionInterpretationContractual purpose

    Court Rules in Favor of Contractor in Complex Contractual Dispute, Sets New Precedent for Price Adjustments

    2023-11-23 Hon. Justice BELL AT [1]

    法官命令允许上诉。取消了Ball J在2023年5月5日做出的命令,取而代之的是要求:a)宣布根据合同(B300服务支持合同-ACOTS2(合同编号:HP 201771/2018/001)的附件B的附录E的1.1条款的正确解释(2018年7月31日由原告[现上诉人]作为“承包商”与被告[现被告]作为“霍克太平洋”签订,生效日期为2018年8月1日),“基准日指数值”是包含了2018年1月1日日期的季度的指数值,用于每个价格调整日期的价格调整计算;b)被告[现被告]按照合同条款4.3的规定支付原告[现上诉人]在合同下所欠款项,包括已经利息按欠款金额累计计算;c)反诉被驳回。被告支付上诉人的上诉费用。一审费用不另行裁定。

Hazan Hollander
Johnson Winter Slattery
Uniform Commercial Code § 2-209 (U.S.)
Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSConstructionInterpretationExpression “Base Date Index Value”

    Court Ruling Clarifies Pricing Formula in Software Contract Dispute

    2023-05-04 Hon. Justice BALL

    以下是文本的中文摘要: (1) 要求被解雇; (2) 根据合同第B附件的附录E的1.1和1.4条款的正确解释,对于每个后续价格修订日期,"基准日期指数值"是合同附件E的1.7条中规定的适用指数的值,该指数为"过去一年"分子中提到的年份之前的值; (3) 根据合同附件E的1.1条款的正确解释,用于1.1条款中的公式的"上一年的价格"("PI")的值,是根据合同附件E的1.1条款中的公式正确计算的从前一年1月1日开始的12个月期间的调整价格; (4) 根据合同附件E的1.1条款正确计算的2022年1月1日价格修订日期的"新年价格"("Pn")为:(a) 循环服务为1,674,966.09美元;和(b) 调查和报价服务为每天2,225.02美元; (5) 原告支付被告的费用; (6) 在14天内有权申请更改第5项命令。

    Hazan HollanderJohnson Winter Slattery
    Read case brief
  • LEASES AND TENANCIESRent and outgoingsFailure to payWhere sublessee agreed to indemnify head lessor in respect of outgoings

    Legal Tangles: Court Resolves Complex Warehouse Lease Dispute Over Rent, Repairs, and Trespass Claims

    2021-07-26 Hon. Justice WHITE

    要求如下:(a) 在7天内,原告应根据上述理由向被告送达其所提议的简短判决书;(b)再过7天,被告应向原告提交其对这些简短判决书所提议的任何修订;(c)如果双方就根据上述理由所作的判决达成一致意见,应立即向我的助理提供相关判决的简短判决书;(d)如果双方意见不一致,双方均需在另外7天内向我的助理提交所主张的判决的简短判决书,并提供不超过5页的支持其主张的陈述。

    Hazan Hollander
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNINGconsentpower to grantsubdivision

    Court Rejects Subdivision Appeal, Upholds Environmental Protections in Canberra Region

    2021-06-30 Hon. Justice BASTEN AT [1]

    (1) 求诉被驳回。 (2) 上诉人需支付被上诉方的上诉费用。

    Hazan Hollander
    Community Land Development Act 1989 (NSW), s 22
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDURESeparate determination of questionsWhere appropriateSeparate questions ordered

    Court Sifts Through Subdivision Dispute: Key Questions Unraveled in Queanbeyan Development Case

    2020-10-22 Hon. Justice ROBSON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Hazan Hollander
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 28.2
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 5 results