LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
5 cases linked to Hickey Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Hickey Lawyers
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE & PROCEDURESTAYwhere the father seeks a stay of parenting orders pending the hearing and finalisation of an appeal

    Court Upholds Mother's Custody Rights: Father's Appeal for Stay Rejected!

    2023-10-05 Hon. Justice HOGAN BRISBANE

    2023年9月25日提交的一项申请已被驳回,并于2023年9月27日封存。 特此注意: 法院已告知各方,打算在确定与2023年8月25日作出的法令有关的审判费用的申请时,处理被告申请的停止令,并收到各方代表就申请停止令的费用问题提交的意见。 没有任何一个法院被称为“澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法院”。 附在澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法院(第1分庭)发布的这项命令上的印章的设计已经由总检察长依据其签署的未标日期的《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法院(印章)决定2021》确定。 注意:命令的形式取决于法院记录的录入。 注意:本法院判决理由的副本可能会经过审查,以纠正轻微的印刷或语法错误(根据《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021(Cth)》第10.14(b)条),或根据第10.13条对命令进行变更的记录。 1975年《澳大利亚家庭法案》第121条规定,除了在非常有限的情况下,公开涉及家庭法诉讼的个人、相关人员或证人都构成犯罪。 特此注意,本法院根据《1975年《澳大利亚家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条批准了以“斯波尔丁和巴巴罗”代号公开此判决。

Hickey Lawyers
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Read case brief
  • PROCEDURECOSTSDISCONTINUANCE OR WITHDRAWAL FROM PROCEEDINGwhere the plaintiff is the owner of an industrial property

    Legal Tug-of-War: Court Reserves Cost Ruling in Concrete Dispute Saga

    2023-06-13 Hon. Justice FREEBURN

    第三方程序的费用应保留。当事方应就申请的费用进行听证。

    Wotton + KearneyHickey LawyersDoyles Construction Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTConstruction of agreementSettlement agreement relating to initial proceedingWhether covenant not to sue is breached by commencement of later proceeding

    Court Battle Erupts Over Share Buyback Deal: Dr. Jackson Fights for Justice Against Dockvest Executives

    2023-05-10 Hon. Justice M OSBORNE
    Hickey Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • High Stakes Auction Drama: Court Battle Unfolds Over $425,000 Sports Car Bid

    2023-02-02 Hon. Justice HOLLIDAY KC
    Brander Smith McKnight LawyersHickey Lawyers
    PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS – APPLICATION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT – Whether the Court should exercise its discretion – construction of s50(2) Sale of Goods Act 1896 (Qld) – rule 292 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 – whether there is no real prospect of successfully defending part of the plaintiff’s claim and there is no need for a trial of the part of the claim – whether the terms of the contract provided for a price payable on a “day certain irrespective of delivery” – appropriate matter to exercise discretion to allow summary judgment.
    Read case brief
  • REAL PROPERTYTORRENS TITLECAVEATS AGAINST DEALINGSREMOVAL

    Caveat Cleared: Court Upholds Mortgagee's Right to Sell Amid Controversy Over Good Faith

    2021-03-07 Hon. Justice HOLMES

    要求移除第一回应者关于Lot 6 SP105007的警告。第一回应者需按照标准基准支付申请人和第二回应者的费用。

    DLA PiperHickey Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 5 results