LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • service@legallink.info
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
5 cases linked to Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NT · sorted by most recent
Firm:Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NT
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALCHILD SUPPORTMajority judgment

    Court Overturns Child Support Agreement in Landmark Family Law Case: Errors in Judgment Lead to Appeal Victory

    2023-03-29 Hon. Justice AUSTIN SYDNEY

The Court grants leave to appeal to the Appellant and dismisses the further amended initiating application. The court issues a costs notice under the provisions of Chapter 9 of the federal proceedings Costs Act 1981, which states that it would be inappropriate for the Attorney General to authorize a payment on the behalf of the appellee in respect of expenses incurred by him in connection with the appeal.

Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NTWestminster Lawyers
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) Pt VII, Div 4, ss 80C, 92, 118, 136
Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision to cancel the applicant’s (Subclass 030) (Bridging visa) under s 116 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)whether the visa could be cancelled whilst the applicant was on remandwhether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s evidence or submissions

    Court Upholds Visa Cancellation for Papua New Guinea National Amid Legal Battle

    2023-03-09 Hon. Justice LAING SYDNEY

    The order is dismissed and the Federal Court may make a new order or variation to the original order. If the court decides that a particular error is significant enough to warrant a change in the order, it may make that order go into effect immediately.

    Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NT
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 116, 359A, 376
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision not to grant the applicant a protection visawhether the Tribunal asked itself the wrong question, reasoned in an illogical or irrational way and/or relied upon unwarranted assumptionswhether the Tribunal misapplied the relevant law, erred in its consideration of the applicant’s claims and/or erred in its application of the ‘real chance’ test

    High Court Quashes Tribunal's Decision on Kenyan Migrant's Protection Visa Claim, Calls for Fresh Review

    2022-11-08 Hon. Justice LAING

    下令发出一纸特别告诉状,撤销2022年6月23日的第二被告的决定。 下令发出一纸职权规则令,命令重新组成的第二被告依法处理申请人的复审申请。 注意:行使这项命令的形式需遵循法院记录的规定。 注意:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排字或语法错误(按《2021年联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规(第二分支)(一般联邦法律)第17.05条第2款第g项规定》),或者根据《2021年联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规(第二分支)(一般联邦法律)第17.05条》记录对命令的变更。

    Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NTNew South Lawyers
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5J, 116
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYWhere the applicant is the wife’s previous solicitorsWhere the applicant seeks a partial interim property distribution for the satisfaction of legal fees owed

    Court Dismisses Solicitors' Bid for Early Property Payout in Family Law Case

    2022-02-07 Hon. Justice MCCLELLAND SYDNEY

    2021年11月2日,第五被申请人提出的申请被驳回。 如果除第五被申请人以外的任何一方要求获得费用令,他们必须在这些裁决书发布之日起的14天内提交并送达不超过三(3)页的书面陈述。 第五被申请人可以在收到上述第(2)项裁决书中提到的书面陈述后的14天内提交并送达有关费用申请的回复意见。 注:裁决书的形式需根据法院记录进行调整。 注:根据《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家事法)规则2021年》第10.14(b)条(Cth)进行审查,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或根据第10.13条(Cth)记录对裁决的修改。 《1975年澳大利亚家事法》第121条规定,在极其有限的情况下,发布涉及家事法诉讼中的个人、相关人员或证人身份的诉讼属于违法行为。 特此注意,根据《1975年澳大利亚家事法》第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院以化名Jepson & Jepson的形式对本裁决的发布获得了批准。

    Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NTLevitt Robinson Solicitors
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 75(2), 79, 80, 117
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY COURTAPPEALPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREThe appellant failed to serve the respondent with the Notice of Appeal and has not shown reasonable diligence in prosecuting the appeal

    Court Dismisses Father's Appeal for Lack of Diligence in Child Support Case

    2015-07-08 Hon. Justice THACKRAY PERTH

    (1)上诉被驳回。 (2)关于费用问题不作任何裁定。 注:裁定的形式将根据法院记录的录入而确定。根据《1975年家庭法案》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,根据本法院与儿童支援注册官之间以Nolan & Child Support Registrar代名进行发表判决已获首席大法官批准。 注意:此判决文书可能会被审查以更正小的排版或语法错误(《2004年家庭法规则》(Cth)第17.02A(b)规定),或记录因《2004年家庭法规则》(Cth)第17.02规定的裁定变更。

    Hunt & Hunt Lawyers NT
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 5 results