LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
31 cases linked to KCL Law · sorted by most recent
Firm:KCL Law
  • TRUSTSApplication to vary provisions of discretionary trustWhere all sui juris beneficiaries consent to variationConsideration of interests of existing minor and potential unborn beneficiaries

    Gengoult-Smith Family Trust Gets Extended Lifeline: Court Approves 30-Year Vesting Delay Amidst $10 Million Tax Concerns

2024-04-16 Hon. Justice MOORE
KCL Law
Read case brief
  • COSTSparty/partyunsuccessful application for separate questionwhether costs should follow the event

    Court Ruling: Plaintiff Modeus Pty Ltd Ordered to Cover Defendants' Costs in Unsuccessful Interlocutory Battle

    2023-11-20 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    原告需支付被告就独立问题申请的费用。

    KCL LawNorton Rose Fulbright
    Procurement (Enforceable Procurement Provisions) Direction 2019 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREseparate determination of questionwhether hearing of separate question should be orderedwhere answer adverse to plaintiff would dispose of proceedings

    Court Rejects Bid for Separate Question in Modeus Procurement Case, Keeping Trial on Course

    2023-11-07 Hon. Justice STEVENSON

    法院拒绝了分开审理的申请。

    KCL LawNorton Rose Fulbright
    Government Sector Employment Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • Security for coststhirdparty claim by defendant against fifth third partydefendant indemnified by the insurer for costs of the third

    Court Dismisses FAS Group’s Bid for Security Costs Against Builder in Warranty Breach Case

    2023-10-12 Hon. Justice KIRTON
    KCL LawWotton + Kearney
    Civil Procedures Rules (2010)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWCONTEMPTwhere wife sought that respondents to subpoenas that had been set aside be held in contempt for nonproduction of documents

    Wife's Contempt Claims Dismissed; Court Orders Costs Amid Family Law Dispute

    2023-08-24 Hon. Justice CARTER MELBOURNE

    2023年6月2日,提交的藐视申请,以邓女士为被告,被驳回。 2023年6月2日,提交的藐视申请,以德马科先生为被告,被驳回。 妻子需支付与她于2023年5月18日发出的传票以及她于2023年6月2日发出的藐视申请有关的以下费用: (a) 对于邓女士,固定费用为4500美元; (b) 对于德马科先生,固定费用为4500美元; (c) 对于丈夫,固定费用为6000美元,支付需推迟,直到夫妻之间关于财产事务的实质性诉讼裁决为止。 注:该判决书的形式须根据法院记录进行修改。 注:本判决书副本可能会经过审核,以更正微小的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则》(Cth)第10.14(b)条),或根据2021年《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则》(Cth)第10.13条记录对命令的变更。 根据1975年《家庭法案》(Cth)第121条规定,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法诉讼中的人员、相关人员或证人的诉讼是违法的。 值得注意的是,根据1975年《家庭法案》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条的规定,法院准许以化名方式发布本判决。

    KCL Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 45A, 112AB, 112AP
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYwhether the Second Respondents have a conflict of interest or perceived conflict of interest from acting as the bankruptcy trustee for the First Applicantfinding that there is no conflict of interest

    Court Rules Out Conflict of Interest in Bankruptcy Trustee Case

    2023-05-31 Hon. Justice TAGLIERI HOBART

    以下是对下面文本的中文总结:关键问题是第二被申请人在充当第一申请人的破产管理人时是否存在利益冲突或被视为利益冲突,该问题的答案是否定的。 此案件将于2023年7月18日上午10点在墨尔本亲自进行进一步的指示听证会。 在14天内,各方应就根据否定性离散问题的裁决而可能达成的任何命令达成协议。 如果根据本命令第3项达成一致意见,则应准备并签署一份一致意见命令,并在指示听证会前至少7天通过电子邮件发送给法庭。 第一被申请人于2023年6月22日下午4点前提交和传送文件:(a)针对2023年4月12日提交的经修订的申请的回应;以及(b)就关于离散问题听证会的成本所依赖的任何陈述材料。 第二被申请人,早先提出了有关成本申请的申请,于2023年6月22日下午4点前提交和传送文件:(a)关于所寻求命令的作证材料,并明确指出所寻求命令的条款;以及(b)关于成本问题的任何依赖的陈述材料。 如果任何一方寻求提出针对非当事人成本的申请,则需在2023年6月22日下午4点前提交和传送诉讼及附随的作证材料。 申请人于2023年7月14日上午10点前提交和传送有关第一和第二被申请人就离散问题听证会而提出的成本申请的任何作证材料。 注意:命令的形式应遵照法院记录。 注意:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭(第2分部)(一般联邦法)规则》第17.05(2)(g)规定),或者记录根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭(第2分部)(一般联邦法)规则》第17.05进行的命令变更。

    KCL Law
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) pt IV, sch 2, ss 19, 58, 82
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWMAJOR COMPLEX FINANCIAL PROCEEDINGS LISTPROPERTYASSET PRESERVATION ORDER

    Court Denies Wife’s Bid for $30 Million Asset Freeze in High-Stakes Divorce Case

    2023-05-22 Hon. Justice WILSON MELBOURNE

    征述2023年5月5日提交的妻子的修订申请中第3、4、5、6和7段被驳回。 我将于2023年9月5日安排此案件的审判。 此案件的进一步听证会延期至2023年7月21日上午10:00,以就主要复杂财务诉讼清单问题进行调整。 在2023年6月6日下午4:00之前,任何一方(包括干预者)寻求成本令的申请必须提交并发送支持该申请的任何陈述。 在2023年6月20日下午4:00之前,任何对该成本申请做出反应的一方必须提交并发送任何答辩陈述,并随后将在论文中决定此申请的成本问题。 备注:订单的形式受法院记录的限制。 备注:根据《2021年联邦巡回法院与澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则》,本判决书的副本可能会进行审核,以纠正轻微的排字或语法错误,或根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则》第10.13款记录对订单的变更。 根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法律法案》第121条,在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法律诉讼中涉及的人物、关联人或证人的诉讼是违法的。 特此说明,根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法律法案》第121条第9(g)项的规定,该法院以Hancock & Hancock的化名审批了本判决的公开发布。

    Lander & RogersKCL LawArnold Bloch Leibler
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATION AND PROBATEWhere an unopposed application for probate in solemn form where multiple wills that the parties had previously indicated they would contestWhere parties have entered a compromise prior to the grant of probate and seek to prove the most recent willMinor beneficiary

    Family Feud Over Wills Ends in Court: Matriarch's Final Wishes Honored as Probates Granted

    2023-03-20 Hon. Justice GORTON
    KCL LawHWL Ebsworth Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • COSTSFirst defendant’s injunction application to restrain dealing with, and for inspection and preservation of, its alleged computer equipmentFirst defendant gave undertaking to commence third party proceedingsUndertakings given by third and fourth defendants

    Court Ruling: Costs Dispute in YIMIAO vs. STAR MINING Unfolds

    2022-12-07 Hon. Justice ATTIWILL
    KCL LawGilbert + Tobin
    Read case brief
  • TRUSTSSupreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), Rule 54.02Determination of questions arising in the execution of a trustWhether it is proper for the trustee to defend related proceeding

    Trust Dispute Erupts: Uniting Church Battles Over Land Ownership in Melbourne

    2022-12-05 Hon. Justice IRVING ASJ
    KCL Law
    Read case brief
  • Plaintiff’s application to amend statement of claim after the close of evidence

    Court Denies Late Amendments in Misleading Conduct Case: Plaintiff’s Claims Rejected After Trial

    2022-11-28 Hon. Justice A RYAN
    MaddocksKCL Law
    Civil Procedure Act 2010
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSWhere the wife seeks indemnity costs of and incidental to the hearings on 21 April 2022 and 15 June 2022Where the husband sought the wife’s application be dismissed

    Court Rules in Wife's Favor: Indemnity Costs Ordered Against Husband in Family Law Dispute

    2022-11-28 Hon. Justice HARTNETT MELBOURNE

    2023年1月28日下午4点前,丈夫以担保方式支付妻子对他有关执行申请的费用及相关费用。 妻子应在此决定书签署之日起7天内将第1项费用的金额以书面形式寄给丈夫。 丈夫应在收到根据第2项决定罗列的费用金额要求的7天内书面回应是否接受其中所指定的金额,假如他接受,则应按照第1项的规定付款,并将该付款作为丈夫依照第1项决定的义务的全部且终止的履行。 假如丈夫不接受妻子根据第2项决定所指定的金额,或者未在第3项中规定的时间内付款,则根据注册官员的评估结果,应支付根据第1项决定应支付的费用金额。 2023年1月28日下午4点前,丈夫应根据其于2022年5月11日提起的一项诉讼中的修正申请,支付妻子的费用和相关费用,此诉讼为丈夫申请取消妻子申请的永久停止令,按照参照联邦法院和澳大利亚家事法院(家庭法规)2021年第3节所允许的金额,由一名注册官员评估费用。 注意:判决的形式将根据法院记录进行调整。 注意:本判决的副本可能会经过审查以纠正细小的排字或语法错误(参照联邦法院和澳大利亚家事法院(家庭法)规则2021年第10.14(b)条),或记录按照联邦法院和澳大利亚家事法院(家庭法)规则2021年第10.13(条款)对决定进行修改。 根据1975年澳大利亚家事法的第121条(Cth),公开揭示涉及家事法诉讼的人,相关人员或证人的程序,除非在非常有限的情况下,会构成违法行为。 值得注意的是,根据1975年澳大利亚家事法的第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院将以Draper&Corwin(No 2)的化名对本判决进行公开发布。

    KCL Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117
    Read case brief
  • Warning administrative mentionProceeding dismissed for parties’ failure to respondApplication to reinstate proceedingRelevant factors

    Court Reinstates High-Stakes Dispute: Jacky Jiang’s Battle Against Investment Trusts Takes Another Turn

    2022-11-13 Hon. Justice JUDICIAL REGISTRAR BENNETT
    KCL Law
    County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 (Vic) rr 13.13(2), 20.03(1), 20.03(3), 24.06 and 34A.16
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALAPPLICATION IN AN APPEALWhere the respondent to the appeal seeks an order that the appeal be summarily dismissed, or alternatively, an order for security for costs

    Court Orders Security for Costs in Ongoing Family Law Appeal: Applicant Must Pay $12,500 or Face Dismissal!

    2022-10-25 Hon. Justice AUSTIN NEWCASTLE

    申请人在14天内应根据法院记录向被申请人的律师支付12,500美元作为被申请人上诉的赔偿费用的担保金,该金额将由他们保管,直到该上诉案件有结果并有关费用的进一步命令出现。 如果根据第一项命令未能支付,则上诉将立即被驳回。 否则,2022年10月21日提交的上诉申请将被驳回。 双方自行负担本申请的费用。 注意:命令的形式取决于法院记录的输入。 注意:根据《联邦法规与澳大利亚联邦法院(家庭法)规则2021》第10.14(b)条(或根据《联邦法规与澳大利亚联邦法院(家庭法)规则2021》第10.13条对命令进行变更),本判决书副本可能会进行审查以纠正次要的排版或语法错误。 特此注意,根据澳大利亚1975年《家庭法》第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院以Draper&Corwin假名发布该裁决的公开。

    KCL Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Pts VII, VIII
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWDIVORCEForumJurisdiction

    Family Court Rules Australia is the Right Place for Divorce Amid Transnational Spat

    2022-08-23 Hon. Justice HARTNETT MELBOURNE

    文本描述了两个已婚人士之间的各种法庭程序。第一次开庭是丈夫提出离婚申请,被驳回。第二个程序是妻子的离婚申请,该申请被列为在不同的法院,即澳大利亚联邦巡回和家庭法院(第 1 庭)进行听证。此申请的案件管理听证会被取消,双方之间的所有其他现有诉讼都将在不同的法院 Hartnett 法官于 2022 年 9 月 12 日举行审判管理听证会。

    KCL Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 39, 121
    Read case brief
  • TRUSTSFamily trustWhether trustee had sufficient knowledge of applicants’ circumstances to exercise its discretion to distribute income of trustWhether judge erred in finding trustee exercised its discretion upon real and genuine consideration in certain years

    Family Trust Turmoil: Court Orders Removal of Trustee Amid Sibling Disputes over $23 Million Estate

    2022-05-17 Hon. Justice KYROU
    KCL LawTisher Liner FC Law
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYTRUSTS AND TRUSTEESJudicial AdviceSupreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic) r 54.02

    Family Law Tug-of-War: Trust Disputes Take Center Stage in High-Stakes Down Under Court Battle

    2022-05-02 Hon. Justice DELANY
    KCL Law
    Read case brief
  • WILLTestamentary capacityTestWhether circumstances arousing suspicion

    Family Feud Unfolds in Court Over Contested Will: Did the Deceased Have Capacity to Change Her Estate?

    2022-03-22 Hon. Justice IRVING ASJ
    KCL LawHWL Ebsworth Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREApplication for preservation of propertyBitcoinCryptocurrency

    Court Confronts Bitcoin Battle: Mr. Chen Seeks Control Over $10M in Cryptocurrency Amid Ongoing Legal Dispute

    2021-12-20 Hon. Justice ATTIWILL
    KCL Law
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREApplications to stay each proceeding against all defendants pursuant to s 440D of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (‘Corporations Act’)One defendant in voluntary administrationAll parties accepted that the proceedings cannot be proceeded with against that defendant, except with the administrators’ consent or leave of the Court, pursuant to s 440D of the Corporations Act

    Crypto Company's Court Case Stays Pending: Blockchain Global Ltd Seeks Time to Investigate Finances Amid Administration Drama

    2021-11-30 Hon. Justice ATTIWILL
    KCL LawSBA Law
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSOppressionFamily companiesWhere litigation brought for an improper purpose to pressure minority shareholders

    Family Feud: $14 Million Legal Battle Unfolds Over Car Dealership's Legacy

    2021-10-04 Hon. Justice FERGUSON
    Lander & RogersKCL Law
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREDiscovery of documentsProduction for inspection of discovered documentsScope of discovery

    Legal Rumble in the Cryptocurrency Jungle: Plaintiffs and Defendants Fight for Financial Justice in Complex Corporate Web

    2021-09-22 Hon. Justice IERODIACONOU ASJ
    KCL Law
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPLICATION IN AN APPEALEXTENSION OF TIMEWhere there is no satisfactory reason for the failure to file a Notice of Appeal within time

    Court Denies Father's Appeal in Custody Dispute: $8,000 Costs Awarded to Mother

    2021-08-08 Hon. Justice STRICKLAND MELBOURNE

    以下是对文本的总结: 1. 于2020年12月22日提交的上诉申请被驳回。 2. 申请人父亲需要支付被申请人母亲的费用,金额为8000美元。 注意:法院记录条目会影响判决的形式。 注意:根据《家庭法规则2004年法案》17.02A(b)条款,本判决书副本可能经过审查,以纠正轻微的印刷或语法错误,或根据《家庭法规则2004年法案》17.02条款记录对订单的修改。值得注意的是,根据《1975年家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条款的规定,法院在Draper & Corwin的化名下发布本判决书已获得首席大法官的批准。

    KCL Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117
    Read case brief
  • Leave to file counterclaimwhether County Court can allow an amended pleading to be filed which falls outside of the jurisdiction of the Courtwhether s 27 of Courts (Case Transfer) Act 1991 (Vic) is applicable

    Courtroom Showdown: Director's Loan Dispute Takes Center Stage as Defendants Fight Back with Counterclaim

    2021-07-25
    KCL LawSBA Law
    Supreme Court Act 1958 (Vic)
    Read case brief
  • 12›

    Page 1 of 2 · 31 results