LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • service@legallink.info
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
3 cases linked to Kerdo Legal · sorted by most recent
Firm:Kerdo Legal
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial reviewwhere Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirmed decision of the first respondent that the applicant was not a person in respect of whom Australia has protection obligations under s 36(2)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)whether the Tribunal failed to consider evidence in an intellectually active way

    Judicial Review Ruling: Tribunal's 'Jurisdictional Error' Overturns Immigration Visa Denial

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice YOUNG MELBOURNE

    根据1958年《移民法》第476条的规定,申请人的修正申请书应被准予。应发出一项聆讯令,指示第二被申请人废除2018年6月8日的决定。应发出一项强制令,指示第二被申请人依法重新审议和确定申请人的申请。如果没有达成一致,第一被申请人应支付申请人的费用。订单的形式应根据法院记录的内容确定。法院可以变更或撤销判决或订单,以纠正次要印刷错误或语法错误,或记录根据法院规则的变更。

Sparke Helmore LawyersKerdo Legal
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 425, 474, 476
Read case brief
  • MIGRATION LAWapplication for extension of timedecision of delegate of Minister for Immigration and Border ProtectionRefugee and Humanitarian (Class XB) visa

    Justice Prevails: Australian Court Grants Refugee Visa Extension for Afghan Couple After Delegate's Oversight

    2023-03-02 Hon. Justice MERCURI MELBOURNE

    The Court grants the applicants' request for an order under section 477. dated 19th April 2017. Awrit is issued directed to respondent, quashing its decision dated 18th April; a writs of mandammus are issued directed at the respondent ordering it to reconsider or determine the applicants according to law

    Mills OakleyKerdo Legal
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 477, 477A
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of decision of Immigration Assessment Authoritywhether Authority misconceived or failed to give proper consideration to evidencewhether Authority reasoning was based on unwarranted assumptions

    Court Upholds Immigration Authority's Decision: No Grounds for Protection Visas in Family's Appeal

    2023-01-11 Hon. Justice LADHAMS PERTH

    The first respondent, the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, and Multicultural affairs, is dismissed. The order is dated as of 17.05.

    Kerdo Legal
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 46A, 473CA, 476, 477
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 3 results