LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
11 cases linked to KHQ Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:KHQ Lawyers
  • FAMILY LAWMAJOR COMPLEX FINANCIAL PROCEEDINGS LISTLIQUIDATORS AND RECEIVERSCOMPANY LAW

Court Grants Liquidators and Receivers Major Remuneration Boost Amidst Economic Complexity

2024-02-26 Hon. Justice WILSON MELBOURNE

根据澳大利亚《公司法》的规定,清算人有权获得适当完成Quen Pty Ltd的清算工作的报酬。法庭实施费用由法庭的记录决定,一切视情况而定。根据《家庭法法案》第121条的规定,未经许可,公开涉及家庭法庭诉讼的相关人员信息是违法的。法庭已经批准以化名形式发布这一判决。

KHQ Lawyers
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWrespondents late filed materialwhether respondents should be permitted to rely upon late filed materialwhether respondents should be heard at all

    Court Orders Critical Financial Disclosure in Filipovic Family Law Battle

    2024-02-26 Hon. Justice O'SHANNESSY MELBOURNE

    这些命令中,申请人菲利波维奇女士被称为“妻子”,第一被告菲利波维奇先生被称为“丈夫”,第二被告菲利波维奇先生的弟弟被称为“兄弟”,第三被告C Pty Ltd和第四被告D Pty Ltd被称为“公司”。法院要求30天内提供财务披露的文件和信息。此外,如果丈夫决定出售土地,需要通知妻子,并按照命令分配销售所得。法官批准以假名发布此判决。

    Kenna Teasdale LawyersKHQ Lawyers
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 198F, s 290
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPARENTINGBest interestsWhere final parenting orders were made by consent

    Court Transformations: Father Granted Sole Parental Responsibility After Troubling Allegations of Abusive Dynamics

    2023-11-14 Hon. Justice HARTNETT MELBOURNE

    法官命令解除以往的所有父母命令。父亲有权决定2010年和2011年出生的孩子的一切事务。在行使父母责任时,父亲应提前书面通知母亲,并在可能的情况下考虑母亲的意见。除非另有书面协议,否则交接应在适当的学校或B市的超市停车场进行。双方可在特定时间通过电话或视频通话与孩子联系。母亲需要征得父亲的书面同意才能让孩子参加任何课外活动。双方都有权与孩子的医生沟通,并及时告知对方任何严重疾病或受伤的情况。父亲可在短时间内向Hartnett法官办公室申请相关命令。

    Trapski Family LawKHQ LawyersClark Family Lawyers
    Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPARENTINGhigh level of conflict between parentswhether orders should be made in respect of 16 year old

    Family Court Ruling: Parents to Share Responsibilities as Teens Navigate New Custody Rules Amid Tensions

    2023-10-05 Hon. Justice MCNAB MELBOURNE

    法官命令双方对婚姻所生的三个孩子承担平等的共同责任。对于M街的财产销售所得,首先支付所有费用和销售佣金,然后清偿M街财产的抵押贷款,剩余部分支付给妻子。在M街财产售出之前,妻子有单独使用权,并独自负责按揭还款。双方需遵守会计师关于解散信托基金的建议。另外,双方需修改对自助退休金基金的受益人提名。最后,双方希望此命令可以尽可能最终解决他们之间的财务关系,避免进一步的诉讼。

    KHQ LawyersGarland Hawthorn Brahe
    Evidence Act (1995) (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • TRUSTEERemoval and replacement of trusteeInherent jurisdictionAmendments to trust deed of uncertain validity

    Court Approves New Trustee for McLaren Family Trust Amid Ongoing Disputes

    2023-04-04 Hon. Justice DELANY
    KHQ LawyersNorton Rose Fulbright
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYInterim ApplicationApplication for Recusal

    Judge Dismisses Wife's Bias Claim in Ongoing Family Property Dispute

    2023-02-08 Hon. Justice MCNAB MELBOURNE

    The wife's application for a dismissal of her appeal is dismissed. A copy of the court's reasons for judgment is subject to review, and this copy must be made available to the public at the time of the trial.

    KHQ Lawyers
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60CC, 75(2)
    Read case brief
  • Family Feud Unravelled: Court Upholds Executor's Role Amid Inheritance Dispute

    2022-01-27 Hon. Justice KEITH JR
    KHQ Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWInjunctionswhether or not the husband should be ordered to pay funds moved overseas into a trust accountnon

    Court Orders Husband to Repatriate $150K Amidst Family Law Dispute: Funds in Limbo as Couple Faces New Challenges

    2021-12-09 Hon. Justice HARLAND MELBOURNE

    1. 诉讼将于2022年2月14日上午9:45继续进行。 2. 所有当事人应注意并遵守《中央实践指导——家庭法案例管理》第5.1-5.20段:https://www.fcfcoa.gov.au/fl/pd/fam-cpd#cpd5interim。 3. 于2022年3月2日举行的提及将取消。 4. 丈夫立即采取一切必要行动和签署一切必要文件,使149,950.00美元的金额支付到妻子的指示律师事务所Waterson Legal的托管账户上,最迟于2021年12月17日澳大利亚东部时间下午4点前支付。 5. Waterson Legal有权代表当事人将资金投资于带息的托管账户中,除非另有进一步命令,否则当事人及其代理人必须禁止处理这些资金。 6. 丈夫应以当事人/当事人基础支付妻子有关2021年10月20日听证会的费用,金额为2,903.75美元。 7. 马上并在本判决书签发之日起7天内,丈夫应采取一切必要行动和签署一切必要文件,通过妻子的律师事务所Waterson Legal(“妻子的律师事务所”)向妻子提供以下文件的真实副本:(a)有关丈夫本人或他有或曾有利益的任何实体在2015年、2016年和2017年结束的财政年度的澳大利亚所得税申报表;(b)有关丈夫本人或他有或曾有利益的任何实体在2015年和2016年结束的财政年度的澳大利亚税务通知书;(c)关于丈夫、他的母亲C女士或D女士以源自丈夫在澳大利亚的任何账户中的货币购买和登记在国家B名下的任何财产的销售合同、结算单、相等于土地登记查询的文件以及所有其他文件,以及关于这些资金的来源的所有文件;(d)关于妻子于2021年12月2日作出宣誓陈述所述的第23段交易的后分离的任何金融机构的账单,包括交易的传输、目的地和当前位置;(e)丈夫在分离后在澳大利亚或任何国家外经营或他有利益的任何交易实体的所有财务报表、所得税申报表、BAS报表和分类账。 8. 如果未遵守本诉讼中的相关命令,根据《1975年家庭法案》第112AD条和第121条,可能会受到处罚。 9. 《1975年家庭法案》第121条规定,在非常有限的情况下,发布识别与家庭法案件相关的人、关联人或证人的诉讼是犯罪行为。 10. 值得注意的是,根据《1975年家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条,此法院以Kachmar&Madero为化名批准发布此判决。

    Waterson LegalKHQ Lawyers
    Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth), s.116(1)(b)
    Read case brief
  • WILLS AND ESTATESWhere plaintiff seeks to be appointed as administrator ad litemWhere plaintiff in a position of conflict of interestWhere plaintiff unable to provide an administration guarantee.

    Family Feud Erupts Over Elite Middle Park Property: Court Dismisses Son's Bid for Estate Control

    2021-05-06 Hon. Justice MCMILLAN
    KHQ LawyersStenta Legal
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudicial reviewMagistrates’ Court of Victoria decision to strike out plaintiff’s statement of claimProcedural fairness

    Court Overturns Magistrate's Ruling, Upholds Right to Fair Hearing in Graduate's Fight Against University

    2020-11-30 Hon. Justice INCERTI
    KHQ Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALAppeal allowed by consentCosts certificates issued for rehearing

    Court Grants Consent Appeal: Costs Certificates Approved in Alford Family Law Case

    2016-07-25 Hon. Justice THACKRAY SYDNEY

    按同意意见: (1)上诉被允许。 (2)本案将移送至澳大利亚联邦巡回法院重新审理,日期待定。 (3)法院根据联邦诉讼费用法(1981)第8条的规定,给予上诉方和被上诉方一份证书,认为总检察长有权根据该法案支付各自在重新审理过程中所发生费用的授权。 注意:该命令的形式受到记录在法院档案中的订购的限制。请注意,根据《家庭法令》(1975)第121(9)(g)条的规定,法院已批准本判决以Ramsey & Ramsey (Costs)的化名进行发布。请注意:根据《家庭法令》(2004)第17.02A(b)条的规定,本判决的副本可能会进行审核,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或记录根据《家庭法令》(2004)第17.02条进行的变更。

    Monardo LegalKHQ Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 11 results