LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
33 cases linked to Kingston Reid · sorted by most recent
Firm:Kingston Reid
  • HUMAN RIGHTSAge discriminationwhether applicant was treated less favourably in his employment because of his age, whether the contract of employment was breached and whether his position was made redundant considereddiscrimination established

    Age Discrimination Case: Court Orders Apology and $20,000 in Damages for Unlawful Treatment

    2021-11-30 Hon. Justice DRIVER SYDNEY

法院宣布,被告违反2004年《澳大利亚联邦年龄歧视法》第14条和第18(2)(a)和(d)条款,对申请人进行非法歧视。 根据1986年《澳大利亚人权委员会法》第46PO(4)(b)条款的规定,被告应向申请人发出道歉,具体内容由当事方商定或在没有商定的情况下由法院规定。 根据第46PO(4)(d)条款的规定,被告应支付给申请人2万澳元的一般损害赔偿金。 根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法院法庭和澳大利亚家庭法院法》第211(3)条和2017年9月18日发出的联邦法院有关对判决的利息的实施守则,被告应支付利息直至判决。 提出于2019年11月1日并于2021年5月12日修订的申请否则被驳回。 注意:订单的形式取决于法庭记录中的输入。 注意:此份判决理由书的副本可能会进行检查以更正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法院法》第17.05(2)(g)条规定),或者记录根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法庭法庭和澳大利亚家庭法院法》第17.05条规定的订单变更。

HNT LEGALKingston Reid
Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth) ss 14, 15, 18
Read case brief
  • HUMAN RIGHTSdiscriminationequal opportunityleave required for complaint to proceed

    Human Rights Showdown: Court Refuses Leave for Discrimination Case to Proceed

    2021-10-19 Hon. Justice D DINNEN

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Kingston Reid
    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREstay of proceedings

    Court Refuses Police Stay Request, Opens Door for Future Reconsideration

    2021-09-21 Hon. Justice A BRITTON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Kingston Reid
    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWgovernment informationaccess applicationinformation for which there is a conclusive public interest against disclosure (privileged information)

    Court Upholds Non-Disclosure in High-Stakes Government Information Case

    2021-09-21 Hon. Justice M RIORDAN

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Kingston Reid
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPreliminary discoveryTo identify potential cause of actionreasonable inquiries

    Court Orders Ventia to Release Key Documents in Ongoing Employment Dispute: Former Operations Manager Claims Unfair Dismissal

    2021-06-07 Hon. Justice SCOTTING

    以下是对文本的简要中文总结: (1)被告应在传票第1段中规定的类别中描述的文件发现之日起14天内提交。 (2)被告应在本判决书之日起28天内向原告提供文件供其检查。 (3)被告应根据协商或评估结果支付原告对于此申请的费用,费用按照权责保险基础计算。

    Kingston Reid
    Civil Procedure Act 2005
    Read case brief
  • HUMAN RIGHTSequal opportunitywhether leave required for complaint to proceedprinciples applying to grant of leave

    Leave Denied: Court Upholds Discrimination Complaint Threshold in Landmark Human Rights Ruling

    2021-03-25 Hon. Justice LUDLOW

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Kingston Reid
    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CRIMINAL LAWprosecutionwork health and safetyduty of persons undertaking business

    Tragic Workplace Incident: Manufacturer Fined $165,000 After Worker’s Hand Amputated in Die Press Accident

    2020-08-18 Hon. Justice RUSSELL

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Kingston Reid
    Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 3A, 21A, 22, 27(2), 30A, 30B, 30D, 30E
    Read case brief
  • COSTSParty/PartyCosts orders in interlocutory proceedingsSecond to fourth defendants (“corporate defendants”), having successfully defended the plaintiff’s motion, sought an order that the plaintiff pay the corporate defendants’ costs on the basis that costs should follow the event (the “event” being dismissal of the plaintiff’s motion)

    Court Ruling: Plaintiff Ordered to Foot Bill After Failed Strike-Out Motion Against Corporate Defendants

    2020-05-28 Hon. Justice REIN

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Baker McKenzieKingston Reid
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPleadingsStriking outWhere plaintiff company sued former employee (first defendant) alleging that he took the plaintiff’s confidential information and gave it to his new employer, a rival group of companies (second to fourth defendants)

    Court Rules Against Striking Out Defenses in High-Stakes Data Theft Case

    2020-04-28 Hon. Justice REIN

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Baker McKenzieKingston Reid
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • ‹12

    Page 2 of 2 · 33 results