LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
3 cases linked to Leanne Cain & Associates · sorted by most recent
Firm:Leanne Cain & Associates
  • FAMILY LAWinterim parenting ordershow often the child should communicate with a parent overseaswhen the child should return to Australia from overseas after a holiday

    Family Court Ruling: New Interim Orders Shape Cross-Border Parenting for Young Girl

    2023-08-16 Hon. Justice O'SHANNESSY MELBOURNE

    文本概括: ML 2341/2023 这句话没有明确的文本内容,可能是一个案件的编号或者法律文件的标题。

Nicholes Family Lawyers
Leanne Cain & Associates
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 69ZL
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWCHILDRENWhere the mother seeks sole parental responsibility, for the child to live with her and to spend no time with the father on the basis of unacceptable risk which she says he poses to the childWhere the father originally opposed the orders sought by the mother but later withdrew his opposition citing health concerns which he said prevented him from continuing to participate in the litigation

    Mother Granted Sole Custody After Father's Health Concerns Prompt Withdrawal in Landmark Family Court Ruling

    2021-11-25 Hon. Justice MCEVOY MELBOURNE

    所有先前的监护命令被解除。 孩子X,出生于2010年,与她的母亲生活在一起。 母亲对X拥有单独的监护责任。 母亲每隔大约六个月通过电子邮件向父亲提供有关X的任何重大发展的信息。 没有任何命令要求父亲通过任何方式与X一起共度时间或沟通。 独立儿童律师的任命被解除。 注意:命令的形式受法院记录的影响。 注意:根据《2021年联邦法庭法和澳大利亚家庭法庭(家庭法)规则》第10.14(b)条款,本法院的裁决原因副本可能会经过审查,以纠正小的印刷或语法错误,或根据《2021年联邦法庭法和澳大利亚家庭法庭(家庭法)规则》第10.13条款记录对命令的变更。 根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法》第121条款,在非常有限的情况下,公开揭露与家庭法律诉讼有关的人、有关人或证人的案件属于违法行为。 注意:本法院根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法》第121(9)(g)条款批准以Fadden & Sockett为化名发布此判决文件。

    Leanne Cain & Associates
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALAPPLICATION IN AN APPEALEXPEDITE HEARING

    Court Races to Resolve Family Dispute: Children’s Best Interests Prompt Expedited Appeal Hearing

    2017-11-16 Hon. Justice STRICKLAND MELBOURNE

    以下是文本的中文总结:(1)申请人于2018年1月10日提出的上诉申请被驳回。(2)根据被告的口头申请,上诉案件编号SOA 94 of 2017将加急处理,并列入从2018年4月30日星期一开始的全庭会议。(3)将上诉案件提交给上诉登记官进行指令听证会以准备上诉听证。注意:订单的形式需在法院记录中输入之后方可确定。根据Family Law Act 1975(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,本法院已获得首席大法官批准,以Gatenby & Chisler为化名公开发表本判决。注意:本法院判决的原因副本可能会经过审查,以修正次要的印刷错误或语法错误(Family Law Rules 2004(Cth)第17.02A(b)条款),或根据Family Law Rules 2004(Cth)第17.02条款记录对订单的变更。

    Leanne Cain & Associates
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 3 results