LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
153 cases linked to Macpherson Kelley · sorted by most recent
Firm:Macpherson Kelley
  • TRUSTSExpress trustFamily discretionary trustLost trust deed

    Legal Tug-of-War: Family Trust Dispute Unraveled in Landmark Case

2027-10-03
Hon. Justice ELLIOTT
Macpherson KelleyNorton Rose Fulbright
Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREInterim preservationFreezing ordersApplication to vary

    Court Freezes HBU's Assets Amid Legal Battle Over $1.5 Million Loan

    2024-09-18 Hon. Justice RICHMOND
    Macpherson Kelley
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiescentre based child care facility

    Kid's Care Clears Court: $9,000 Cost Ruling and Development Approval for New Kellyville Child Care Facility

    2024-09-09 Hon. Justice KULLEN AC
    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.46, 8.7, 8.15, Sch 1 Div 2 s 7
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationcentre based child care centreconciliation conference

    Child Care Centre Greenlit: Court Upholds Appeal for Guildford Development

    2024-09-04 Hon. Justice MILLER AC
    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7, 8.15
    Read case brief
  • PROCEDUREform of orderscostsgeneral rule that costs follow the event

    Court Rules on $364,000 Tax Dispute: Liquidator's Costs Decisions Follow Key Judgment

    2024-09-03 Hon. Justice BLACK
    Macpherson KelleyCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(1)
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSGENERAL CONTRACTUAL PRINCIPLESCONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACTSwhere the first appellant developed and sold a handheld physiotherapy device (the product)

    Court Dismisses Appeal Over Royalty Deed Breaches in Controversial Physiotherapy Device Sale

    2024-08-15 Hon. Justice DALTON
    Macpherson KelleyEllem Warren Napa Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    Pitt Town Development Plan Approved: Court Upholds Appeal, Grants Consent for 30 New Lots

    2024-08-12 Hon. Justice KULLEN AC
    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 8.7, 8.15, 10.3, Pt 7, Div 7.1, Subdiv 2, Sch 1, Div 2, s 7
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSWinding upApplication by liquidator for directionsWhether liquidator is justified in retaining or repaying certain monies

    Court Rules Liquidator Must Repay Millions to Tax Office Following Pivotal Mistake

    2024-08-11 Hon. Justice BLACK
    Macpherson KelleyCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth), s 195-1
    Read case brief
  • MODIFICATION APPLICATIONconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    Court Approves Major Modifications for Petersham Boarding House Development

    2024-07-30 Hon. Justice O'NEILL
    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.55
    Read case brief
  • APPEALwhether argument sought to be run on appeal was outside the pleadingswhether the trial had been in part run outside of the pleadings such that the argument was available to be run on appealCONTRACTS

    Court Ruling Favors Capitalink in $133K Contract Dispute Amid Questions of Liability

    2024-07-18 Hon. Justice BELL
    Macpherson Kelley
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 136
    Read case brief
  • APPEALDevelopment applicationchild care centreconciliation conference

    Court Grants Green Light for New Child Care Centre at East Gosford: Development Consent Upheld!

    2024-07-15 Hon. Justice TARGETT

    法院命令如下:(1)申请人根据《1979年环境规划和评估法》第8.15(3)条的同意或评定支付被告的费用。 (2)上诉获得成功。(3)发展申请编号为DA/1847/2023的开发许可经修改后被批准,允许在地块21348号的第22、23和24号地段进行现有建筑物的拆除、两个土地地块的合并、被确认树木的移除以及一座地下停车场的单层85个儿童活动中心的建造,附条件详见附件A。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7, 8.10, 8.11, 8.14, 8.15
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONdemolition works and construction of centre based child care centre for 120 childrenconciliation conferenceamended plans and documents

    Glenfield Green Light: Court Approves Child Care Centre Development Amid Cost Orders

    2024-07-09 Hon. Justice DICKSON

    法院命令如下:(1)申请人被准许提交经修改的发展申请,该申请在裁定书第[6]号中列出。(2) 根据1979年《环境规划和评估法》第8.15(3)条款,申请人应在法庭命令日期后21天内支付应对经修改的发展申请产生的被抛弃的应诉方成本,金额为4500美元。(3)上诉被支持。(4)发展申请编号2758/2023/DA-C,请求拆除现有建筑,合并地块,并在新南威尔士州2167号格伦菲尔德博加恩维尔路18-20号所描述的土地上建设一个儿童托管中心(容纳120名儿童),地下停车场可停放30辆车以及相关的场地和景观工程,将在附件A的准许条件下生效。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 4.15, 8.7, 8.15
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALcentrebased child care centreconciliation conference

    Court Greenlights Major Child Care Centre Development Amid Community Concerns in North Tamworth

    2024-06-17 Hon. Justice ESPINOSA

    法院裁定:(1)上诉获得支持。(2)申请人应支付应答人因申请开发许可的修订而损失的费用,根据1979年环境规划和评估法第8.15(3)条的规定,同意或进行评估。(3)对于土地合并和细分以创建拟议的1地块和第2地块的开发申请编号DA2022-0547,拟议的1地块和第2地块上现有建筑和结构的拆除,树木清除,以及在7-9 Gorman Street, North Tamworth, NSW, 2340地块上建造一个100个位置、两层的中心型儿童看护中心,共25个停车位,以及土地景观和土木工程,获得开发许可,并受附件A的条件约束。

    Macpherson KelleyMaddocks
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALTorrens title superlot subdivisionconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Greenlights Tallawong Superlot Subdivision Amid Controversy

    2024-06-17 Hon. Justice ESPINOSA

    法院命令如下:(1)申请人被批准向法院提交附注2中提及的修订开发申请。 (2)上诉被支持。 (3)发展申请编号DA-23-00022,托伦斯标题的分成2个超级地块,修建公共道路,移除树木,雨水排放和相关场地工程工作在DP30186的地块66号,即NSW 2762 Tallawong Road 58号,经发展许可的条件在附件A中确定。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, Pt 7, 8, s 7.6
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONCentrebased child care facility in R2 Low Density Residential zone

    ### "Court Greenlights New Child Care Facility in St Marys, Overcoming Local Objections"

    2024-06-13 Hon. Justice HORTON

    法院命令:(1)上诉得到支持。(2)DA22/0435发展申请,涉及拆除现有建筑、清除植被、场地整合并在29和31 Marsden Road,St Marys NSW 2760建造一个容纳80名儿童的新中心式儿童托管设施,包括地下停车场,批准通过,并须遵守附件A中规定的条件。(3)除了附件E,F,J,K和W外,所有展品均归还。

    Macpherson KelleyHWL Ebsworth
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONsubdivisioncreek line worksconstruction of residential flat buildings

    Court Overturns Council's Rejection: Major Development Project Greenlit in Warriewood

    2024-06-13 Hon. Justice WASHINGTON AC

    法院命令:(1) 上诉获得认可。 (2) 发展申请DA2021/2600,用于将土地细分为十二(12)块,支持土木工程,湿地/湿地地区的生物多样性管理,以及在法律上被描述为DP 972209第二地段,DP 349085第二地段和DP 349085第一地段的土地上建造两(2)座住宅楼,也就是在Warriewood Road的43,45和49号地块的土地的许可,根据附件A中的条件确定。 (3) 申请人须根据1979年环境规划与评估法第8.15(3)条的规定支付被告的费用,同意或评估后支付。 (4) 所有展品均退还,除了A,B,C以及3,4和6。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, s 7.2
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYApplication of trustee under s 146 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) for distribution of dividendswhere no statement of affairs filed by the Bankrupt with the Official Receiverapplication heard ex parte

    Court Greenlights Final Dividend Distribution in Bankruptcy Case: Peihua Pan's Estate Advances Despite Missing Paperwork

    2024-05-22 Hon. Justice YOUNG MELBOURNE

    根据澳大利亚破产法1966年第146条,申请人作为破产财产的受托人,应在21天内发布意向声明,宣布对潘培华的破产财产进行首次和最终分红。申请人必须在公告中注明相关条款和条件,包括将破产撤销并支付剩余款项给官方受托人,支付受托人的成本和费用,并禁止在21天后将分红支付给债权人。此外,法院可能会根据记录对命令进行变更。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 19(1), 140, 145, 146, 153A, 54(1), 77CA.
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    Court Greenlights Major Subdivision in Austral: 30 New Lots to Transform Local Landscape

    2024-05-21 Hon. Justice KULLEN AC

    法院命令:(1) 上诉获得支持。(2) 开发许可被授予发展申请DA-73/2023的修改版,用于将土地划分为30个托伦斯产权地块,分为3个阶段,包括在法定描述为DP2475的土地上进行公共道路、树木清除和相关场地工程建设,地址为澳大利亚2179年奥斯特拉尔第十三大道70号和第十三大道80号,受条件附件A的约束。您/她/他的尊贵法官。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.46, 8.7, 10.3, Sch 1, s 7
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    Court Approves Controversial Box Hill Development Despite Height Breaches: New Housing Project Set to Transform Local Skyline

    2024-05-20 Hon. Justice WALSH

    法院的命令于2024年5月27日修改,具体如下:(1)申请人获准向法院提交所述的修改发展申请书。 (2)Think Planners于2023年11月6日准备的书面请求,根据《州环境规划政策(区域—中央河城)2021》,寻求变动第4.3(2)节中建筑物标准的高度,针对拟议的地块1和地块2,被支持。 (3)上诉被支持。 (4)发展申请编号1625/2022/JP,涉及拆除现有建筑、将土地划分为2个超级大地块、基础设施工程、在34-36 Terry Road, Box Hill, NSW, 2765进行12座住宅楼和地下停车场的分期施工、园林绿化及土木工程的申请,得到了批准,但需要满足附件A中的条件,如有修改。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdevelopment applications for subdivision of landconciliation conferenceagreement reached in each appeal

    Landmark Ruling: Court Greenlights Major Subdivision Developments in Farley

    2024-05-13 Hon. Justice GRAY

    法院命令:申请人获准提交修改后的发展申请DA/2022/1133,并支付委员会的费用。上诉得以支持。DA/2022/1133的发展申请获得批准,附带条件A。在另一审议中,法院命令:申请人获准提交修改后的发展申请DA/2023/31,并支付被告的费用。上诉得以支持。DA/2023/31的发展申请获得批准,附带条件A。

    Macpherson KelleySparke Helmore Lawyers
    Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, ss 7.7, 7.13
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONsubdivisionconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Greenlights Major Residential Subdivision in Farley: 29 New Lots on the Way

    2024-05-01 Hon. Justice WALSH

    法庭裁定如下:(1)申请人获准向法院提交修订后的发展申请。 (2)申请人应根据《环境规划与评估法》1979年第8.15(3)条规定支付理事会的费用,如协商或评估。 (3)上诉获得支持。 (4)发展申请编号DA/2022/1094,用于将土地分割为29个住宅地块和建设及奉献3条公共道路,包括砍树和排水工程的批准条件为附件A。

    Macpherson KelleySparke Helmore Lawyers
    Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, Pt 7, s 7.7
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTCONSENTCONSENT NOT TO BE UNREASONABLY WITHHELDwhere the first applicant provides services to the respondent’s hospital under an agreement for the management of an emergency centre

    Court Slams Hospital's 'Unreasonable' Consent Hurdle: A Win for Emergency Services Management

    2024-04-14 Hon. Justice APPLEGARTH

    被申请人已不合理地拒绝同意将第一申请人70%的股份出售给第三方PEHA Holding Co Pty Ltd或其指定人。命令被申请人按标准基础支付申请人的申请费用,具体金额待评估,除非双方达成一致。

    Macpherson KelleyThomson Geer
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesdeferred development consent

    Court Greenlights Controversial Castle Hill Development: Appeal Upheld, Costs Ordered!

    2024-04-08 Hon. Justice KULLEN AC

    法院命令如下:(1)根据1979年环境规划和评估法第8.15(3)条款,申请人应支付应由于修订发展申请而被取消的被告费用,支付金额应在此命令日期后的28天内支付,金额为双方同意或评定的。 (2)上诉获得通过。 (3)根据批准附件A的许可条件,给予发展申请号872/2023/ZA的推迟发展许可,用于拆除现有建筑物,建造私人道路,挡土墙和土木工程,并分割土地以创建DP367326号地块G上的六个共管产权用地,地址为14 Telfer Road,Castle Hill NSW 2154。

    Matthews Folbigg LawyersMacpherson Kelley
    Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, ss 7.2, 7.3
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONmixed use developmentconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Greenlights Controversial Mixed-Use Development in Manly: $4,000 Costs Ordered

    2024-03-27 Hon. Justice O’NEILL

    法庭的命令是:(1)申请人根据1979年的环境规划和评估法案第8.15(3)条款,必须在这些命令的日期后28天内支付被告的费用,金额为4,000美元。(2)上诉被支持。(3)拆除和修建地下停车场的混合用途开发的发展申请号码2022/2256,已经根据附表A的条件被批准。

    Macpherson Kelley
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.7
    Read case brief
  • 1234567›

    Page 1 of 7 · 153 results