Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The application has been rejected.
The application has been rejected.
The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.
The application has been rejected.
以下是文本总结的中文版本：（1）上诉被驳回。（2）关于费用的命令不存在。请注意：命令的形式受到记录进入法院记录的影响。值得注意的是，根据1975年《家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条款，最高法官已经批准本法院以Wilburn＆Wilburn的化名发表本判决。请注意：本法院作出的判决理由的副本可能需要进行复审以纠正小的排版或语法错误（根据2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02A(b)规定），或记录根据2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02规定的命令变更。
Page 7 of 7 · 153 results