LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
4 cases linked to Malouf Solicitors · sorted by most recent
Firm:Malouf Solicitors
  • NEGLIGENCEtransport accidentpassenger attempting to board train while doors closingbreach

    Train Tragedy: Court Awards 1.17 Million to Injured Passenger in Landmark Negligence Case

    2022-09-20 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    (1)原告被判赔偿总额为1,179,368.53美元。 (2)除非任何一方希望申请变更费用令,被告需支付原告的费用。

Ashurst
Malouf Solicitors
Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW)
Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPleadingsParticularsPersonal injury claims

    Court Grants Plaintiff's Late Amendment in Personal Injury Case: A Path to Justice

    2022-06-28 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    准许原告在2022年6月30日上午10点前提交修订的具体事项陈述,以反映原告有意提起的所有索赔和索赔金额。

    AshurstMalouf Solicitors
    Read case brief
  • EVIDENCETendency evidenceIntoxicationSignificant probative value

    Landmark Ruling: Court Approves Key Intoxication Evidence in Groundbreaking Case

    2022-06-26 Hon. Justice CAVANAGH

    2022年5月27日的通知中列出的指定证据是可采纳的。

    AshurstMalouf Solicitors
    Australian Consumer Law
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALPROPERTYWhere, given the way the parties presented their cases, it was open to the primary judge to value the husband’s business at the mid

    Court Upholds Property Division After Lengthy Marriage: Appeal Dismissed in Samper & Samper Case

    2021-08-04 Hon. Justice AINSLIE-WALLACE SYDNEY

    以下是文本的中文摘要: 1. 允许上诉人提供其费用清单作为依据。 2. 驳回上诉。 3. 在28天内,上诉人支付被上诉人的费用,总额为30,418美元。 注意:订单的形式将根据法院的记录进行修改。注意:本判决的副本可能会经过审查,以纠正其中的小的排版或语法错误(根据2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02A(b)条款),或是根据2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02条记录订单的变化。值得注意的是,根据1975年《家庭法》第121(9)(g)条款,法院批准以Samper & Samper为假名在该法院发布此判决。

    Barry Nilsson LawyersMalouf Solicitors
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 4 results