LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
2 cases linked to Markham Geikie Farrugia · sorted by most recent
Firm:Markham Geikie Farrugia
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREAppeal from the dismissal of interim parenting orders regarding the appellant’s application for supervised time with the child and interim property orders concerning an application for partial property distribution to provide the appellant with funds to meet his legal costs

    Court Dismisses Father's Appeal for Supervised Parenting Orders Amid Claims of Domestic Violence

    2022-10-10 Hon. Justice MCCLELLAND SYDNEY

上诉被驳回。 在这些命令的日期起28天内,上诉人应支付被上诉人的费用共计4,356美元。 注意:命令的形式受法院记录的影响。 注意:本判决的副本可能会经过审查,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021》(Cth)规定的规则10.14(b)),或根据《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021》(Cth)中的规则10.13记录对命令的变更。 根据1975年《家庭法法》(Cth)第121条款,除非是在极少数情况下,发布涉及家庭法诉讼的身份、相关人员或证人的诉讼是违法的。 值得注意的是,根据《1975年家庭法法》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,法院以化名Bower&Marshall的身份发布本判决已获得批准。

Markham Geikie FarrugiaArk Law Family Lawyers
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALAPPLICATION IN AN APPEALApplication by the appellant to be provided with the transcript of oral reasons of the primary judge

    Judicial Transcript Tango: Court Grants Access to Oral Judgment in Family Law Discrepancy Dispute

    2022-06-07 Hon. Justice ALDRIDGE SYDNEY

    1.原审法官于2022年2月23日的未决理由的副本,明确标注为此目的,将提供给各方及其法律代表,仅供上诉使用。 2.各方及其法律代表不得披露该备忘录的内容,也不得向任何其他人分发副本。 3.提交于2022年5月12日的上诉申请被否决。 注意:该指令的形式应符合法庭记录中的内容。 注意:根据《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021》第10.14(b)条款,这份法院判决的副本可能会经过审核以纠正轻微的打字或语法错误,或根据第10.13条款对命令进行变更记录。 值得注意的是,根据1975年《澳大利亚家庭法案》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,本法院以Bower&Marshall的匿名身份发布此判决的出版物。

    Markham Geikie Farrugia
    Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) rr 10.13, 10.14
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 2 results