LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
17 cases linked to MEMCORP LAWYERS · sorted by most recent
Firm:MEMCORP LAWYERS
  • APPEALSappeal from the Local Court to the Supreme Courtappeal as of right “only on a question of law”no leave to appeal on a question of mixed fact and law sought

    Court Dismisses Building Firm's Appeal in Payment Dispute: Costs Awarded to Linx Constructions

    2024-04-10
Hon. Justice WRIGHT

2023年10月19日提交的原告传票被驳回。(2) 原告需要支付被告的费用。你的尊贵法官法官命令。

Chamberlains Law FirmMEMCORP LAWYERS
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW), ss 13, 14, 14(1) – (4), 15, 15(2)(a)(i), 15(4)(b)(i)
Read case brief
  • CIVIL PRACTICE & PROCEDUREapplication for summary dismissalCORPORATIONSasserted action by an assignee against directors or officers of a deregistered former corporate debtor and an asserted accessory

    Legal Showdown: Summary Dismissal Sought in Case Against Deregistered Corporate Directors

    2024-02-13 Hon. Justice ABADEE

    Paragraph [33] describes the significance of the order given by the judge in a court case. It states that the order holds legal authority and must be followed by all involved parties. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of respecting the judge's authority and decisions.

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSwhere Health Care Complaints Commission failed to prove majority of allegations of unsatisfactory professional conductwhere Health Care Complaints Commission failed to prove professional misconductwhat is “the event” and who is the successful party

    Health Care Complaints Commission Falls Short: Tribunal Rules on Costs in Professional Conduct Case

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice HENNESSY

    "被告应支付申请人同意或评定的20%成本。被告的成本申请被驳回。"

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • LOCAL GOVERNMENTCouncillorsreferral of alleged misconduct of a former Councillor under the Local Government Act 1993

    Former Councillor Found Guilty of Misconduct: Tribunal Rules on Key Allegations

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice T SIMON

    法庭裁定1b, 3, 4, 5和6号理由成立。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • OCCUPATIONSmedical practitionerswhere medical practitioner has been found to have inappropriately prescribed drugs of addictionwhether such conduct amounts to “professional misconduct”

    Doctor's License on the Line: Educational Mandate Issued After Improper Drug Prescriptions

    2023-11-09 Hon. Justice HENNESSY

    根据新南威尔士州《医疗从业者监管国家法》第149A(1)(d)条，Morsingh先生必须完成关于处方第8类和第4D类药物的教育课程。根据第149A(3)条，如果不遵守第1项命令，Morsingh先生将被禁止注册。双方需在规定时间内提交文件，每份文件限制为5页。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • OCCUPATIONSmedical practitionersprofessional registration and disciplineunsatisfactory professional conduct

    Medical Misconduct Unveiled: Tribunal Rules on Controversial Drug Prescriptions

    2023-08-03 Hon. Justice HENNESSY

    根据上述文本，投诉1.2和1.3未被证实，投诉1.4关于未获得处方药权限已被证实，但涉及对患者A开具氧考酮的部分未被证实，投诉1.5, 1.6(d), 1.7, 1.10(a), 1.10(b)和(c), 1.11(a), (b), (c)和(d)未被证实，投诉1.8, 1.9, 1.12和1.13被证实。根据新南威尔士州2013年《民事和行政法庭法案》第64（1）（c）条款，禁止在法庭证据中发布任何患者的病史。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 64
    Read case brief
  • COSTSseven day hearingjudgments entered in favour of plaintiff against multiple defendants for compensatory damages for trespass to land representing a very small fraction of the amount of compensation claimed by the plaintiffexemplary damages also awarded in favour of the plaintiff against two of the defendants

    Court Weighs Costs in Land Trespass Case: Rove Wins Minimal Damages but Faces Heavy Legal Bills

    2023-04-16 Hon. Justice WILLIAMS

    无法提供准确信息，因为没有提供原文内容。请提供更具体的信息，以便我能够为您提供准确的摘要。

    McInnes Wilson Lawyers MelbourneMihalatos & Associates SolicitorsMEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98
    Read case brief
  • TORTtrespass to landwhere several defendants and many other unidentified persons drove onto the plaintiff’s land and dumped waste on the landwhether defendants did so with the consent of the plaintiff or the person in possession of the land at the time

    Court Ruling: Waste Dumping Defendants Held Liable in Landmark Trespass Case

    2023-03-23 Hon. Justice WILLIAMS

    请提供详细的文本，以便我为您提供准确的中文摘要。

    McInnes Wilson Lawyers MelbourneMihalatos & Associates SolicitorsMEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 34(1)(a), s 34(2), s 34A, s 35
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYgeneral principles and maximsthey who seek equity must do equitydefendant successful in defending enforcement of deed on grounds of unconscionable conduct and Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW), s 7

    Court Ruling Shakes Up $400k Property Dispute: Unconscionable Conduct Takes Center Stage!

    2023-02-26 Hon. Justice ROBB

    以下是文本的中文摘要： (1) 裁定宣布原告和被告于2013年10月3日签署的契约(“契约”)全部无效。 (2) 裁定撤销契约。 (3) 裁定对原告进行装修和改造[温斯顿山物业]应支付的公平合理补偿金额为40万美元。 (4) 裁定原告支付被告的诉讼费用，总额为21.5万美元。 (5) 裁定原告应支付给被告的总费用金额为21.5万美元，用于冲抵应支付给原告的补偿金额，总额为40万美元，因此被告应向原告支付的总金额为18.5万美元。 (6) 裁定根据第5项的金额，被告向原告支付的18.5万美元将在房产销售的收益中支付，除非有进一步的命令。 (7) 裁定对修订的诉状进行驳回。 (8) 裁定对交叉索赔进行驳回。 (9) 给予各方享有在提前3天通知的情况下申请的自由。

    Edwards Kirby LawyersMEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREbuilding disputedispositive orders after publication of reasonssubcontractor succeeds with claim on debt

    Landmark Judgment in Building Dispute: Subcontractor Claims Victory on Debt While Contractor Secures Damages!

    2022-10-30 Hon. Justice ABADEE

    As an AI model, I do not have access to any specific text or paragraphs. If you provide me with the text from paragraph 33, I will be more than happy to summarize it for you in Chinese.

    Macquarie LawyersMEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 21, 90, 98
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONdispute between head contractor and subcontractorwhether there was a defect in the appearance of bowing on stairs after works

    Concrete Tensions: Court Rules on High-Stakes Building Dispute at Sydney Airport

    2022-10-16 Hon. Justice ABADEE

    请提供具体的文本以便我能够为您提供准确的中文摘要。

    Macquarie LawyersMEMCORP LAWYERS
    Building and Construction (Security of Payment) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 8, 9, 15, 32
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdisciplinary proceedingsfinding of professional misconductorder of NCAT cancelling registration of medical practitioner

    Medical Misconduct Exposé: Tribunal Grounds Doctor’s Registration Over Assault Claims

    2022-06-27 Hon. Justice WHITE AT [1]

    1. 驳回申请，不准许上诉新南威尔士州民事行政裁决法庭对卫生保健投诉委员会诉莫辛 [2021] NSWCATOD 13的决定。 2. 准许上诉新南威尔士州民事行政裁决法庭对卫生保健投诉委员会诉莫辛(第三号案) [2022] NSWCATOD 28的决定。 3. 将2022年4月13日在诉讼号2022/00106590中提交的上诉通知视为已获准准许的上诉通知。 4. 通过删除“s 149C(5)”并改为插入“s 149C(7)”，修改新南威尔士州民事行政裁决法庭在卫生保健投诉委员会诉莫辛(第三号案) [2022] NSWCATOD 28的第二项命令。 5. 否则驳回上诉。 6. 起诉人应支付被告的两项诉讼费用。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), Sch 5, cl 29
    Read case brief
  • COSTSplaintiff successful in obtaining judgmentjudgment in an amount less than $500,000whether plaintiff should not receive a costs order because the proceedings could have been commenced in the District Court

    Court Rules in Favour of Plaintiff: Defendant Ordered to Cover Costs Following Unreasonable Rejection of Settlement Offer

    2022-04-07 Hon. Justice DARKE

    被告被判决为支付原告的诉讼费用（除了与反诉有关的费用），该费用将在截至2021年9月14日的费用上按照普通标准支付，并在此后产生的费用上按照赔偿标准支付。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74MA
    Read case brief
  • REAL PROPERTYleasesconstruction of leasewhether rent amount is inclusive or exclusive of GST

    Court Ruling: Landlord Can Pursue Unpaid Rent but Not Outgoings in Granville Lease Dispute

    2022-03-14 Hon. Justice DARKE

    房东有权要求租户支付未付租金的金额，但不包括支出。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth), ss 9-70, 9-75
    Read case brief
  • HEALTHprofessional registration and disciplineprofessional misconductprotective orders

    Dr. Morsingh's Medical License Revoked: Two-Year Ban on Health Services Following Misconduct Ruling

    2022-03-01 Hon. Justice COLE

    Morsingh博士的注册作为医生根据《卫生从业者管理国家法律（新南威尔士州）》第149C（1）（b）条被取消。根据《卫生从业者管理国家法律（新南威尔士州）》第149C（5）条，对Morsingh博士实施了为期两年的非评审期。Morsingh博士被禁止提供任何健康服务，直到他根据《卫生从业者管理国家法律（新南威尔士州）》第149C（5）条再次成为注册卫生从业者。 Morsingh博士需支付卫生抱怨委员会的费用。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Health Care Complaints Act 1993 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • PRACTIVCE AND PROCEDUREapplication for leave to amend the Commercial List Statement

    Amendment Request Denied: Court Upholds Rulings in Commercial List Case

    2021-08-30 Hon. Justice WILLIAMS

    原告要求修改的申请被拒绝。

    McInnes Wilson Lawyers MelbourneMEMCORP LAWYERS
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 34, 35
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONHome Building Act 1989 (NSW)Residential building workConsequences of failure to obtain contractor licence and insurance

    Court Ruling: Homeowner's Renovation Nightmare Unfolds as Deed of Debt Faces Unconscionability Challenge

    2021-05-24 Hon. Justice ROBB

    请参阅第[265]、[272]、[278]、[289]、[300]、[303]、[306]、[336]、[345]、[353]和[368]-[370]段。在指定的方向听证会上，法院将考虑制定旨在落实这些判决理由的命令，并根据情况考虑未来诉讼的进行方式。

    MEMCORP LAWYERS
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    Read case brief

    • Page 1 of 1 · 17 results