LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
2 cases linked to Meredith Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Meredith Lawyers
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSWhere the husband was wholly unsuccessfulWhere the Court found the husband’s Notice to Produce to be an abuse of process

    Costly Defeat for Husband: Court Orders $35,000 in Legal Fees to Wife in Family Law Case

    2023-07-17 Hon. Justice ALTOBELLI SYDNEY

    根据此命令的日期,在28天之内,被申请人丈夫要支付给申请人妻子的费用,金额为35,000美元。该命令的形式将视乎法院记录的进入而定。此判决的副本可能会被审核以纠正小的排版或语法错误(根据《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院》(家庭法)规则2021(澳大利亚联邦)第10.14条款(b)),或者根据《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院》(家庭法)规则2021(澳大利亚联邦)第10.13条款记录命令的变化。根据1975年(澳大利亚联邦)《家庭法法案》第121条规定,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法程序中涉及的人员、关联人员或证人的程序是违法的。特此声明,本法院根据1975年(澳大利亚联邦)《家庭法法案》第121(9)(g)条的授权,对此判决以夏尔福德和斯佩尔丁的化名进行出版。

Newnhams Solicitors
Meredith Lawyers
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSWhere the wife commenced parallel proceedings in Australia and in the B State Supreme Court for property adjustment subsequent to a marriage breakdownWhere the husband made an application for an anti

    Court Orders Wife to Pay $47,000 in Legal Costs After Prolonged Family Battle

    2022-03-08 Hon. Justice CAMPTON SYDNEY

    根据此命令的日期,在21天内,妻子需要向丈夫支付因2022年1月27日制定的反诉讼禁制令而产生的费用,金额为40,000美元。此外,在命令签发后的21天内,妻子还需要向丈夫支付此费用申请的费用,金额为7,000美元。请注意,命令的形式可能会受到法院记录的影响。此判决原本可能因存在小的排字或语法错误而有待修正(根据2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家事法)规则》第10.14(b)条),或者记录一项命令变化(根据2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家事法)规则》第10.13条)。根据1975年《家庭法案》(澳大利亚联邦法案)第121条,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法律诉讼的程序并明确涉及人员、相关人员或证人的身份是犯罪行为。值得注意的是,根据1975年《家庭法案》(澳大利亚联邦法案)第121(9)(g)条的批准,此法院以Douglass&Hearn的化名发布此判决。

    Long Saad WoodbridgeMeredith Lawyers
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79, 117
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 2 results