LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
3 cases linked to MGA Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:MGA Lawyers
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYPractice and procedureapplicant proposes to file expert evidence on account of profits one week before commencement of hearingwhether hearing should be vacated to give respondents an opportunity to respond to the account of profits evidence, or instead proceed with the hearing, and hear evidence in relation to account of profits at a later time

    Court Decides: High-Stakes Hearing on Intellectual Property Set to Proceed Amid Late Evidence Controversy

    2023-05-07 Hon. Justice MANOUSARIDIS SYDNEY

    2023年5月15日至19日安排的听证会将继续进行。 注:该命令的形式取决于法院记录中的条目。 注:法院可以根据《联邦法院和家事法庭法规2021年(第2分部)(普通联邦法)》第17.05(2)(g)规定,修改或撤销判决或命令以纠正微小的印刷或语法错误,或根据《联邦法院和家事法庭法规2021年(第2分部)(普通联邦法)》第17.05规定记录对命令的变更。

MGA LawyersGilbert + Tobin
Read case brief
  • INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYPractice and procedureapplications for discoverywhether certain categories of documents ought to be discovered

    Court Orders Document Discovery as Intellectual Property Dispute Heats Up

    2023-03-02 Hon. Justice MANOUSARIDIS SYDNEY

    The Federal Court has ordered the respondents to give verifiable discovery of documents falling within a category of 6, in order to meet the definition of documents in the document entitled "Applicant's Proposed Discovery Categories".

    MGA LawyersGilbert + Tobin
    Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) r 14.02(2)(b)
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSApplication by shareholder in closely held companies for relief from alleged oppression by coshareholderPlaintiff fifty per cent shareholder in companies with first defendant holding the other fifty per cent of the issued shares

    Family Feud Escalates to Court: Judge Orders Winding Up of Disputed Equestrian Companies

    2021-03-22 Hon. Justice GARDINER ASJ
    MGA Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 3 results