LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
1 cases linked to Neilson Law · sorted by most recent
Firm:Neilson Law
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREReview of a Registrar’s decision not to list matter on urgent basisDecision not reviewable

    Court Denies Father's Urgent Appeal in Family Law Dispute: Emphasizes Need for Clarity in Legal Applications

    2021-11-28 Hon. Justice ALSTERGREN MELBOURNE

    1. 父亲于2021年11月15日提出的复议申请被驳回。 2. 双方应自行承担申请复议的费用。 注:命令的形式应根据法院记录进行相应处理。 注:根据《联邦巡回法院及澳大利亚家事法院(家事法)规则草案2021年》第10.14(b)条款,本判决书的副本可能需要进行审查,以纠正次要的打字或语法错误,或根据第10.13条进行命令的记录变更。 根据1975年《家事法》第121条(联邦条款),在非常有限的情况下,发布指明涉及家事法程序的当事人、相关人员或证人的诉讼是违法的。 值得注意的是,根据1975年《家事法》第121(9)(g)条款,这个法庭以Cardone & Carrigan的化名发布本判决的行为已经得到批准。

The Norton Law Group Family Lawyers North Sydney
Neilson Law
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) ss 190, 254, 256
Read case brief

Page 1 of 1 · 1 results