LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
2 cases linked to Ramsden Family Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Ramsden Family Lawyers
  • REAL PROPERTYCaveatAssociate judge refused to order removal of caveatWhether associate judge conducted a trial of the originating motion

    Family Feud Over Lorne Property: Court Upholds Mother's Caveat, Thwarting Daughter's Sale Plans

    2023-05-10 Hon. Justice NIALL
Ramsden Family LawyersAitken Legal
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALLEAVE TO APPEALInterim maintenance

    Court Reverses Maintenance Ruling: Appellant Ordered to Pay $583 Weekly to Ex-Partner and Children

    2022-07-18 Hon. Justice AUSTIN NEWCASTLE

    上诉被允许。2022年2月4日(2022年2月10日修订)由澳大利亚联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第二部)作出的第1和第2项命令被撤销。 上诉人应根据以下条件向被上诉人支付每周583美元的维持费: (a)第一笔付款应在命令生效之日起7天内支付;(b)付款应通过直接存款方式支付到被上诉人在A银行的账户32上。 根据1981年《联邦诉讼(费用)法》(通常简称为Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth))第9条的规定,上诉人被授予费用证书,认为在该法下,司法部长有权授权向上诉人支付与上诉有关的费用。 根据1981年《联邦诉讼(费用)法》(通常简称为Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth))第6条的规定,被上诉人被授予费用证书,认为在该法下,司法部长有权授权向被上诉人支付与上诉有关的费用。 注:命令的形式需符合法院记录中的条目。 注:这份法院判决的副本可能会进行审查,以修正细微的印刷或语法错误(根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(家庭法)规则》(通常简称为Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth))第10.14(b)规定),或记录根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(家庭法)规则》(通常简称为Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth))第10.13条的命令变更。 根据1975年《家庭法法》(通常简称为Family Law Act 1975 (Cth))第121条,除了极其有限的情况外,公开揭示与家庭法诉讼有关的人员、相关人员或证人的诉讼是违法的。 值得注意的是,根据1975年《家庭法法》(通常简称为Family Law Act 1975 (Cth))第121(9)(g)条的规定,该法院以匿名名称"Gilmour & Hofte"的形式公开发布了这份判决。

    Ramsden Family Lawyers
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 44, 90SB, 90SD, 90SF
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 2 results