LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
9 cases linked to Rankin Ellison Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Rankin Ellison Lawyers
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationalterations and additions to existing Marinaadequacy of parking assessment

    Court Dismisses Marina Expansion Plans: Parking Concerns Take Center Stage

    2024-02-28 Hon. Justice DIXON

    法庭裁定:(1)上诉被驳回。 (2)对于建设两层修建的现有码头(包括会员休息室、健身房、游泳池、温泉、泳池休息室、露台、甲板、设施、储藏室和机房)、园林景观、场地准备工程(包括部分拆除现有的滑道和土方工程)的开发申请(编号DA 16-2019-8-1),位于澳大利亚士兵岛2A Ridgeway Avenue, 2C Ridgeway Avenue, 2E Ridgeway Avenue, 9 Mitchell Street和2A Sunset Boulevarde的土地(Lot 539 DP823769, Lot 321 DP 636840, Lot 322 DP 636840, Lot 2071 DP 852662, Lot 1 DP 1058490),以及士兵岛324 Soldiers Point Road 3号地SP 59025上的代客停车设施,被裁定为不予批准。 (3)除A、B、C、F、G、J、K和4之外的展品退还。

Rankin Ellison Lawyers
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.15
Read case brief
  • PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMSapplication by plaintiff for leave to commence proceedings to claim work injury compensation in the District CourtPersonal Injury Commission unable to exercise federal jurisdictions 26 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (NSW)

    Court Grants Go-Ahead for Paramedic's Fight for Workers' Compensation in Legal Jurisdiction Battle

    2024-02-22 Hon. Justice ACTING LEVY

    请参阅第17段以获取命令。 "order"通常指的是"法官命令",而"your/her/his HONOR"是对"法官"的尊称。

    Rankin Ellison Lawyers
    Commonwealth Constitution, s 75, s 76
    Read case brief
  • JUDICAL REVIEWwhole person impairmentType 2 diabetespre

    Court Overturns Ruling on Workplace Injury Claim: Genetic Factors Not Enough for Deduction in Disability Assessment

    2023-11-02 Hon. Justice HARRISON ASJ

    法院命令撤销上诉小组的决定,并将此事提交给人身伤害委员会主席依法处理。第一被告需支付原告的诉讼费。

    Rankin Ellison Lawyers
    Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 15 and 24
    Read case brief
  • DUST DISEASESappeal from Dust Diseases Tribunaldeceased worker exposed to asbestos dust and fibres at appellant’s factory between 1962 and 1964heavy smoker

    Court Upholds Asbestos Verdict: Appeal Dismissed in Landmark Dust Disease Case

    2022-08-22 Hon. Justice BRERETON AT [1]

    (1)上诉被驳回。 (2)上诉人支付被上诉方的上诉费用。

    Taylor and Scott LawyersRankin Ellison Lawyers
    Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudicial ReviewWorkplace Injury Management and Worker’s Compensation Act 1998Rejection of additional relevant evidence

    Court Scrutinizes Workers' Compensation Ruling: Fresh Evidence Key in Psychiatric Injury Case

    2022-05-24 Hon. Justice HARRISON ASJ

    以下是上述文字的中文总结:(1) 2021年5月28日和2021年4月15日的上诉委员会的决定被撤销。 (2) 此事将被退回给人身伤害委员会的主席根据法律进行裁决。 (3) 第一被告方应支付原告的费用。

    Rankin Ellison Lawyers
    NSW Workers Compensation Guidelines for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (Fourth edition, 1 April 2016), cls 1.6, 11.11, 11.12, 11.13, Table 11.5, Table 11.6
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWjudicial reviewdecision of a delegate of the Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission as to whether appeal to Appeal Panel should be allowed to proceedwhere delegate determined several of the plaintiff’s proposed grounds of appeal to the Appeal Panel on a final and conclusory basis

    Court Quashes Workers Compensation Ruling: A Win for Plaintiffs Seeking Justice

    2021-03-01 Hon. Justice HARRISON ASJ

    法院裁定如下:(1)撤销2020年5月7日劳工赔偿委员会注册处的决定。(2)撤销2020年6月11日劳工赔偿委员会颁发的确定证书,该证书生效于注册处的决定。(3)将此事案件返还给劳工赔偿委员会按法律处理。(4)各方自负其费用。如果各方寻求不同的费用决定,他们需在判决书之日起14天内自由提出意见。

    Turner Freeman Lawyers AdelaideRankin Ellison Lawyers
    Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALPARENTINGWhether the primary judge failed to have regard to the totality of the relevant evidence, in particular the recommendations of the single expert

    Court Upholds Parenting Orders Amidst Complex Family Law Appeal: Costs Awarded Against Appellant

    2019-03-26 Hon. Justice RYAN SYDNEY

    (1) 部分允许上诉。 (2) 订购17号通过删除“有许可”一词并替换为“必须”一词进行修改。 (3) 其他上诉被驳回。 (4) 上诉人应支付被上诉人的费用,金额为5000美元。 (5) 上诉人应支付独立儿童律师的费用,金额为5511美元。 注意:命令的形式取决于法院记录中的命令的输入。 值得注意的是,根据1975年(澳大利亚联邦)家庭法案第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法庭以Garrety&Steyn匿名的名义发布此判决的出版物获得了首席法官的批准。 注意:本法院判决理由的副本可能会接受审查,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误(2004年(澳大利亚联邦)家庭法规则17.02A(b)条),或记录根据2004年(澳大利亚联邦)家庭法规则17.02(Cth)的命令变化。

    Gillard Family LawyersRankin Ellison Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • (Cth) was appropriateWhere there is no consideration as to whether the orders made were just and equitableAppeal allowed. FAMILY LAWAPPEAL

    Court Overturns Family Law Ruling: Justice Reigns After Flawed Property Settlement

    2018-06-06 Hon. Justice ALSTERGREN SYDNEY

    该文本总结为以下几点: (1) 上诉被允许。 (2) 2018年6月7日作出的第17至24项指令被撤销。 (3) 根据1975年(联邦)家庭法案第VIII部的规定,各方根据该法案的申请被移交到悉尼注册处,由一个不是审判法官的法官重新审理。 (4) 根据1981年(联邦)诉讼费用法第9条的规定,上诉方丈夫获得成本证书,该证书是法院认为适当授权总检察长根据该法案向上诉方丈夫支付与上诉相关的费用。 (5) 根据1981年(联邦)诉讼费用法第6条的规定,被上诉方妻子获得成本证书,该证书是法院认为适当授权总检察长根据该法案向被上诉方妻子支付与上诉相关的费用。 (6) 根据1981年(联邦)诉讼费用法第8条的规定,上诉方丈夫和被上诉方妻子获得成本证书,该证书是法院认为适当授权总检察长根据该法案向各方支付与重新审判相关的费用。注:该命令的形式取决于其在法院记录中的记录。值得注意的是,根据1975年(联邦)家庭法案第121(9)(g)条,该法院批准以Carlson和Carlson的化名公布本判决。注意:本判决理由的副本可能会经过审核,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误(2004年(联邦)家庭法规定第17.02A(b)条),或者根据2004年(联邦)家庭法规定第17.02条记录命令的变更。

    Rankin Ellison Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALCHILDRENWhere interim parenting orders provided that the mother have sole parental responsibility, except with respect to education where parental responsibility was to be equally shared

    Court Upholds Mother's Sole Custody in Bitter Parenting Dispute

    2015-08-11 Hon. Justice RYAN SYDNEY

    以下是摘要的中文翻译: 要求上诉被驳回。 要求上诉人在达成或评估协议后的二十八(28)天内支付被上诉方的上诉费用和附带费用。 注:该判决书的形式将根据法院记录的录入而确定。根据澳大利亚1975年《家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条款,克莱森与克莱森法庭以假名发表此判决的出版物已得到首席法官的批准。 注:该法庭判决原因的副本可能会被审核以纠正字体或语法错误(澳大利亚2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02A(b)条款),或根据澳大利亚2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02条款记录订单的变动。

    Rankin Ellison Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 9 results