LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
10 cases linked to Reid Legal · sorted by most recent
Firm:Reid Legal
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALalterations and additions to former warehouse and change use to commercial office premisesconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Greenlights Major Warehouse Transformation in Chippendale: Appeal Upheld for Commercial Office Development

    2023-12-19 Hon. Justice ESPINOSA

    法院命令:(1)上诉获得支持。(2)对于Chippendale的19-21 Buckland Street的D/2022/1359开发申请,包括对一座以前的仓库建筑进行改建和增加,包括拆除现有楼层、保留外观并建造额外的三层楼,并将该地点用作商业办公场所,决定通过授予同意,但必须遵守附件A中的条件。

Sydney Law
Reid Legal
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 7.32, 8.7
Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONresidential flat buildingagreement.

    Court Greenlights Controversial Bellevue Hill Development: $6,000 Costs Ordered After Appeals Process

    2023-09-25 Hon. Justice HARDING AC

    法院命令:(1)申请人根据《1979年环境规划和评估法》第8.15(3)条款支付应对方$6,000的成本费,28天内支付。(2)上诉获得支持。(3)对于74 Bellevue Road, Bellevue Hill的住宅楼开发申请DA324/2022/1(又称为Lot 1 DP 532849),通过授予开发许可的方式来确定,须遵守附件A中列出的条件。

    Reid Legal
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.7, 8.15
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONmixed use development in B2 Local Centre zoneresidential apartment developmentconciliation conference

    Court Greenlights Controversial Kensington Mixed-Use Development Despite Height Dispute

    2023-08-10 Hon. Justice HORTON

    法院命令如下: (1) 根据兰德威克地方环境计划2012年第4.6款规定的要求,关于第4.3款规定的建筑高度标准,由ABC Planning Pty Limited于2023年7月编制的申请得以支持。 (2) 申请人应根据《1979年环境规划和评估法》第8.15(3)条支付理事会因废弃而产生的成本,金额为3,250.00美元。 (3) 上诉得以支持。 (4) 根据附件B的条件,对位于肯辛顿安纳兹大道229号的开发申请号DA/415/2022,寻求拆除现有建筑和结构,建造一处混合用途开发项目,包括一处零售空间和16个住宅单元(包括8个1卧室单元、5个2卧室单元和3个3卧室单元,包括经济适用房),地下车库可停放15辆汽车和1个访客车位,授予开发许可。

    Reid Legal
    Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, reg 139.370
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONalterations and additions to existing warehouse and distribution facilityconciliation conferenceagreement between parties

    Court Greenlights $20,000 Warehouse Expansion in Banksmeadow: Development Consent Granted Following Conciliation

    2023-05-01 Hon. Justice SHERIDAN AC

    法庭命令如下:(1) 赞扬上诉。 (2) 根据附件A中的条件,对位于澳大利亚班克斯梅多3 Jullian Close的现有仓库和分销设施的改建和增加发展许可进行批准。 (3) 根据1979年环境规划和评估法案8.15(3)节,申请人需支付同意的20000澳元作为修订申请造成的被告费用,必须在这些命令生效之日起28天内支付。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersReid Legal
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.55, 8.7, 8.15
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders.

    Court Greenlights Child Care Facility Amid Community Concerns: Appeal Upheld for Allambie Heights Development

    2023-01-05 Hon. Justice CHILCOTT

    法院命令:(1)根据1979年环境规划和评估法第8.15(3)条款,申请人应支付应诉人作为法院允许申请人提交修改后的发展申请而白白浪费的费用,金额为3500美元;(2)上诉被支持;(3)对Condamine街397号,Allambie Heights进行改建和增加现有的两层建筑以提供与工程有关的儿童照管设施,并进行相关的地形工程、景观设计和平面停车的发展申请编号DA2022/0492被批准,但需遵守《A附件》中的批准条件。

    Reid Legal
    Education and Care Services National Regulations 2011, regs 107, 108
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: shop top housing developmentheritage conservationeffect of proposed development on item of heritage significancewhether proposal exhibits design excellence

    Bondi Beach Development Gains Green Light: Historic Shop-Top Housing Project Approved Amid Heritage Concerns

    2022-11-10 Hon. Justice HORTON

    法院命令如下:(1)上诉获得支持。 (2)发展申请号305/2021旨在获得对现有建筑进行改建和增加的同意,包括拆除附属建筑的后部分并在后方建造一个新的五层商铺住宅开发项目,其中包括一个地下室层、新的地面商业场所和以上八个住宅单元,在Bondi Beach的31-33号Hall Street经批准同意,并附有同意条件(附件A)。 (3)所有展品除A、W、Z和7号外均退还。

    Reid Legal
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.16
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: shop top housing developmentheritage conservationeffect of proposed development on item of heritage significancewhether proposal exhibits design excellence

    Bondi Beach Heights Controversy: Appeals Court Weighs Heritage and Design in Shop-Top Housing Proposal

    2022-07-26 Hon. Justice HORTON

    请参考110页的指示。

    Reid Legal
    Architects Act 2003
    Read case brief
  • APPEALApplicant seeking to set aside a default judgementWhere plaintiff has not filed or served affidavits on which she wishes to rely to establish the grounds of appealAdjournment application refused

    Court Rules Against Dr. Qasim: Default Judgment Upheld, Defendants Cleared of Wrongdoing

    2021-10-25 Hon. Justice SCHMIDT AJ

    1. 我命令对Kekatos律师事务所;Alan Davidson;Paula Graham(财务主管);Strata Professionals;Andrew Thompson;Heather Mitchell;Tony Maher;以及Pauline Wright的诉讼被驳回。 2. 我还命令Qasim博士支付由Kekatos律师事务所;Alan Davidson;Heather Mitchell;Tony Maher;以及Pauline Wright同意或评定的费用。

    Reid Legal
    Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 319
    Read case brief
  • ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNINGconsentapplication to modify consentcondition of consent requiring payment of monetary contribution

    Court Victory: Developer's Attempt to Slash $987,000 Contribution Doom as Judges Dismiss Consent Change

    2021-08-12 Hon. Justice BASTEN

    以下是上述文本的中文概述: (1) 该上诉得到支持。 (2) 于2021年1月6日颁布的土地与环境法院的命令被撤销。 (3) 代替原命令: (a) 土地与环境法院上诉被驳回。 (b) 修改于2018年4月30日授予的发展许可DA0122/17的申请号MOD007/19被拒绝。 (4) 被告需支付上诉至本法院的上诉人诉讼费用。

    Reid Legal
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 1.5, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.55, 4.56, 4.59, 7.11, 7.13, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTconstructionexpert valuationwhere contract provided that expert determination of current day market value is final and binding save for manifest error

    Court Rules Valuation Errors in Petersham Property Deal are 'Manifest' as Dispute Over Property Partition Heats Up

    2021-03-14 Hon. Justice HENRY

    发现明显错误。各方应提交一份简短的文件,反映这些理由。

    The Norton Law Group Family Lawyers North SydneyReid Legal
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 10 results