LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
7 cases linked to Robbins Watson · sorted by most recent
Firm:Robbins Watson
  • PROCEDURESTATE AND TERRITORY COURTSPERSONS UNDER LEGAL INCAPACITYLITIGATION GUARDIAN

Court Dismisses Family Provision Claim Amidst Bitter Estate Battle: Friend's Role as Guardian Challenged

2024-07-16 Hon. Justice TRESTON
McCullough RobertsonRobbins Watson
Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONMAKING OF A WILLTESTAMENTARY CAPACITYLOSS OR LACK OF CAPACITY AND STATUTORY WILLS

    Family Feud: Court to Decide Validity of 2018 Will Amid Claims of Dementia and Lack of Capacity

    2024-06-13 Hon. Justice COPLEY

    被告应在7天内向注册处提交Ille Uscinski于2018年1月23日签署的遗嘱的原始遗嘱认证书,该文件于2022年10月17日发布。在28天内,被告需以索赔和索赔声明的方式启动程序,寻求2018年1月23日遗嘱的正式遗嘱认证。根据法院的命令,UCPR第7章第2部分适用于该申请程序,允许申请人向昆士兰家庭法事务所和Greenslopes私立医院发出非当事人披露通知,格式应与Sean Powell于2024年5月30日宣誓的宣誓书附录SDP-1和SDP-2中所列大致相同,披露时间为2016年7月1日至2021年11月18日,涉及2018年1月23日的遗嘱。申请人应迅速将根据上述通知收到的任何文件的副本披露给被告,以用于争议程序。

    Robbins Watson
    Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONfamily provisionclaim by grandchildrenwhether primary judge erred in finding dependency

    Court Overturns Family Provision Ruling, Leaving Grandchildren Empty-Handed in Inheritance Battle

    2024-06-04 Hon. Justice LEEMING

    法院允许上诉。取消2023年9月28日作出的命令,取而代之,命令传票被驳回。命令被告支付上诉人上诉和庭审费用。根据1951年《新南威尔士原告基金法案》,为被告颁发证书,涉及上诉费用。

    Somerville Laundry LomaxRobbins Watson
    Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • SUPERANNUATIONBENEFITSMATTERS AFFECTING ENTITLEMENT TO AND PAYMENT OFOTHER MATTERS

    Court Ruling Invalidates Death Benefit Nomination in Superannuation Dispute: Trustees' Conduct Under Scrutiny

    2023-04-04 Hon. Justice MARTIN SJA

    《2018年3月26日生效的捆绑死亡受益提名》无效。双方需提交意见,以确定《1993年(联邦)强制退休金行业监督法》对当前受托人的撤换是否有影响。关于费用问题,我将听取各方意见。

    Robbins Watson
    Read case brief
  • COSTSwhere successful appellant succeeds on appeal on a point different to that made orally at first instancewhere departure from argument made orally (but not in writing) at first instance justifies a partial departure from usual rule that costs follow the eventquestion of discretion in all the circumstances of the case.

    Court Cuts Costs in AMA vs. ASSK Appeal: Respondent to Pay Half of Appellant's Expenses

    2021-06-02 Hon. Justice BELL P

    被告需支付上诉方费用的50%。

    Robbins Watson
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTcontractual constructionwhether promise in Binding Heads of Agreement (HOA) to enter into Business Sale Agreements was subject to a condition precedent, namely the approval of the Purchaser’s Boardwhether consideration for HOA illusory

    Court Rules on Controversial Heads of Agreement: Purchaser's Board Decision Reigns Supreme!

    2021-03-25 Hon. Justice BELL P AT [1]

    中文摘要:1. 允许上诉。2. 撤销初审法官的命令,并代之以命令终止初审程序并由对方承担费用。3. 要求各方在7天内提交书面陈述,每方不超过3页,说明是否应要求被告只支付上诉费用的50%。

    Robbins Watson
    Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 75A
    Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONMAKING OF A WILLEXECUTIONINFORMAL DOCUMENT INTENDED TO BE A WILL

    Court Accepts Heartbreaking Suicide Note as Valid Will: Executors Named to Unevenly Share the Estate

    2020-03-29 Hon. Justice LYONS SJA

    The application has been rejected.

    Robbins Watson
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 7 results