LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
10 cases linked to Rose Litigation Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Rose Litigation Lawyers
  • PROCEDURECIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTSSEPARATE DECISION OR DETERMINATION OF QUESTIONS AND CONSOLIDATION OF PROCEEDINGSSEPARATE DECISION OR DETERMINATION

    Courts Decline to Separate Key Questions in Major Construction Dispute: Niclin's Claims Against Yatala 'Not Ripe' for Determination

2023-11-09 Hon. Justice MARTIN SJA

申请被驳回。法官将听取各方关于费用的意见。

Rose Litigation Lawyers
Read case brief
  • TORTdefamationonestar review posted on plaintiff’s Google and Facebook business pages for a period of 14 days

    One-Star Review Costs Painter $30,000: Court Dismisses Defamation Case Over Google Comment

    2022-12-21 Hon. Justice GIBSON

    根据2005年新南威尔士统一民事诉讼规则第28.2条,原告未能证明根据2005年新南威尔士诽谤法第10A条所要求的严重损害声誉,因此诉讼被驳回。原告需支付被告诉讼费用,并可申请上诉。

    Somerville Laundry Lomax SolicitorsRose Litigation Lawyers
    Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s 10A
    Read case brief
  • PROCEDURECIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTSENDING PROCEEDINGS EARLYSUMMARY DISPOSAL

    Court Denies Summary Judgment in High-Stakes Breach of Warranty Case: McVicker vs. James Set for Trial

    2022-12-01 Hon. Justice KELLY

    Summary judgment的申请被驳回。 我将听取有关费用的各方意见。

    Mills OakleyRose Litigation Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • TORTdefamationapplication pursuant to s 10A(5) Defamation Act 2005for the serious harm element of the plaintiff’s claim to be determined before the trial

    Court Rules Serious Harm in Defamation Case Must Be Addressed Before Trial

    2022-10-09 Hon. Justice GIBSON

    判决书:(1)被告要求在诉讼开始前确定严重伤害要素的申请被准许;原告要求将此事推迟到庭审上进行的申请被拒绝。(2)原告支付被告的费用,并有权申请。

    Somerville Laundry LomaxRose Litigation Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56 and 62(2)
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTSSTATUTORY REGULATION OF ENTITLEMENT TO AND RECOVERY OF PROGRESS PAYMENTSPAYMENT CLAIMS

    Court Dismisses Builder's $582k Claim, Citing Inadequate Payment Documentation

    2022-04-19 Hon. Justice PORTER QC

    诉讼请求被驳回。 原告需支付被告的诉讼费,以标准基础计算。

    ABKJ LawyersRose Litigation Lawyers
    Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (Qld), ss. 61, 67, 68, 69, 75, 100
    Read case brief
  • Court Dismisses Summary Judgment Request: Complexities of Payment Claims in Construction Dispute Unraveled

    2021-12-12 Hon. Justice PORTER QC

    以下是文本的中文摘要: 1. 对于2021年12月6日提出的申请进行驳回; 2. 将该事项列入商事案件清单; 3. 申请费用由被告承担。

    ABKJ LawyersRose Litigation Lawyers
    Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017 (Qld), ss. 61, 67, 68, 69, 75, 100
    Read case brief
  • CONTEMPTsentencingdefamationfailure to comply with permanent injunctions restraining further publication of defamatory material

    Court's Strong Rebuke: Defamer Faces 2-Week Jail Sentence and $20,000 Fine for Disregarding Injunctions

    2021-09-16 Hon. Justice SACKAR

    请参见[66]-[68]。

    Rose Litigation Lawyers
    Bill of Rights 1688 (UK)
    Read case brief
  • CONTEMPTCivil contemptBreach of injunctions restraining defamatory publicationswhether impugned publications are of and concerning the plaintiffs and therefore in breach of orders

    Court Ruling in 'Nightmare on Minjungbal': Defendants Face Defamation Fallout Over Controversial Land Scheme

    2021-06-17 Hon. Justice SACKAR

    "请参阅第147至150段。"

    Rose Litigation Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • REAL PROPERTYSTATUTORY TRUSTEESAPPLICATIONSALE OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY

    Family Feud Over Family Home: Court Ruling Allows Sale of Regents Park Property Amidst Dispute

    2021-06-09 Hon. Justice REID

    2021年2月19日,Kefford女士颁布的命令解除禁止出售该财产的限制。 命令由托管人和他们的律师支付从卖家处收回该财产所产生的费用以及与此诉讼相关的费用,费用金额应达成一致或在无法达成一致的情况下进行评估,从出售财产所得的款项中支付给Sheldrick女士。

    Rose Litigation Lawyers
    Property Law Act 1974 (Qld)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALAPPLICATION IN AN APPEALApplication by the husband to dismiss wife’s appeal

    Court Dismisses Husband's Move to End Wife's Bankruptcy-Affected Appeal: Legal Maneuvers Leave Family Dispute in Limbo

    2016-04-03 Hon. Justice THACKRAY ACJ SYDNEY

    请驳回于2017年3月23日提交的上诉申请。 关于费用,不作出任何裁定。 法院注意到以下事项: 于2017年5月16日,第一被告提交的对上诉申请的修订回应已被撤回。请注意:裁定的形式待在法院记录中输入后再确定。被批准此法院以匿名方式发布Bagheri & Goudarzi与Goudarzi破产遗产受托人案的判决,根据1975年《家庭法案》第121(9)(g)条。 请注意:本判决原因书可能会在审阅中进行次要的排印或语法错误的修正(根据2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02A(b)条),或者根据2004年《家庭法规则》第17.02条记录变动的裁定。

    Slater and Gordon Lawyers SunshineBarkus Doolan WinningRose Litigation Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 10 results