LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
6 cases linked to Rothwell Lawyers · sorted by most recent
Firm:Rothwell Lawyers
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE & PROCEDUREamendment applicationtrial under way

    Court Grants Key Amendment in Family Law Case: $200,000 Trust Fund Controversy Unfolds

    2023-10-30 Hon. Justice WILSON MELBOURNE

申请人被允许修订起诉书。 第七被申请人被允许在2023年11月1日星期三上午10点前提交对修订起诉书第43段的回应。 第七被申请人对修订起诉书第43段的回应必须在2023年11月1日上午10点前分发给所有当事人。 注意:该命令的形式取决于法院记录的录入。 注意:本法院对裁决理由的副本可能会经过审查,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(《联邦巡回法庭和澳大利亚家事法庭(家事法)规则》2021年第10.14(b)),或者根据第10.13条记录对命令的更改。 1975年《澳大利亚家事法》第121节规定,在家事法庭诉讼中,除非在极其有限的情况下,发布能够辨认出与家庭法庭诉讼有关的人士、相关人士或证人的行为是违法的。 注意:本法院根据1975年《澳大利亚家事法》第121节第9(g)款的规定,已经批准以“Warin & Warin”为化名发布本裁决。

Fair Family LawVadarlis & AssociatesRothwell LawyersSebastian Rubera & Associates Pty Ltd
Read case brief
  • TRUSTSKnowing receiptSolicitor misappropriated trust funds for private expenditureWhether solicitor’s wife knowingly received misappropriated trust funds

    Trust Betrayed: Court Rules Against Solicitor's Wife in High-Profile $3.2M Misappropriation Case

    2022-07-18 Hon. Justice NIALL
    Rothwell Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYapplication for review of a registrar’s decisionwhether respondent requires litigation guardianrespondent not capable of understanding or giving instructions in the proceeding

    Court Dismisses Application, Highlights Need for Guardian in Bankruptcy Case

    2022-04-06 Hon. Justice SYMONS MELBOURNE

    1. 2021年11月18日提交的申请复审和2021年12月23日提交的临时申请被驳回。 2. 菲马·佩卡先生需按照一方支付的方式支付申请复审和临时申请的申请人费用及相关费用。 3. 计划于2022年6月16日的指示听证会将取消。 注:该命令的形式须符合法院记录的条目。 注:法院可能根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第2分部)(一般联邦法)规则》(Commonwealth)(第17.05(2)(g)条)进行微小的排印或语法错误修正,或者根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第2分部)(一般联邦法)规则》第17.05条记录命令的修改。

    Rothwell Lawyers
    Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s.79
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSAgreement to settle defamation proceeding brought by respondent against applicantsAgreement made after respondent obtained judgment in default of appearance and prior to assessment of damagesApplicants breached agreement, including by failing to pay settlement sum

    Court Rules on Contentious Defamation Settlement: A Breakthrough in Accord and Conditional Satisfaction

    2022-03-17 Hon. Justice BEACH
    Parke LawyersRothwell Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • CAVEATRemovalCaveator lodging caveat claiming an interest in land as chargeeCaveat lodged without proper basis

    Court Rules in Favor of Devenish Landowner: Sand Solutions Ordered to Pay Costs and Halt Caveat Lodgments

    2021-04-12 Hon. Justice DERHAM ASJ
    Rothwell Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALPROPERTYWhere the appellant asserts that the trial judge erred in finding that there was no asset of value

    Family Feud Escalates: Court Orders New Hearing Over Valuation Dispute

    2016-06-23 Hon. Justice STRICKLAND MELBOURNE

    该文提出了以下要点:(1)允许上诉;(2)撤销于2016年6月24日制定的第3、4和5段令;(3)将审理程序移交给联邦巡回法院,由法官菲普斯以外的法官进行复审;(4)根据1981年(联邦)诉讼费用法案第9条,法院向上诉人事实妻子授予费用证书,该证书表明法院认为根据该法案,总检察长有权批准向上诉人事实妻子支付诉讼费用;(5)根据1981年(联邦)诉讼费用法案第6条,法院向被上诉人事实丈夫授予费用证书,该证书表明法院认为根据该法案,总检察长有权批准向被上诉人事实丈夫支付诉讼费用。该文是以Stenson&Osmund假名的形式发表的,并得到了最高法院根据1975年(联邦)家庭法案第121(9)(g)条的批准。请注意,该法庭判决理由的副本可能会进行审查,以更正轻微的排版或语法错误(《2004年(联邦)家庭法规》第17.02A(b)规定),或记录对令的变更(根据《2004年(联邦)家庭法规》第17.02规定)。

    Mackellars LawyersRothwell Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 6 results