LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
5 cases linked to Sanford Legal · sorted by most recent
Firm:Sanford Legal
  • INSURANCEpublic liability insurancewhere insured was builder responsible for construction sitewhere formworker slipped and fell from scaffolding

    Court Confirms Insurance Repudiation: Builder’s Liability Settlement Upheld Despite Insurer's Claims

    2024-04-23 Hon. Justice PAYNE

    法官驳回上诉并支付费用。

Sanford Legal
McMahons Lawyers
Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONdemolition of existing structures and construction of a residential flat buildingexisting useimpact on the heritage significance of the heritage conservation area

    Heritage Victory: Court Rejects Ashfield Flat Development Application, Safeguards Victorian Villa

    2023-12-06 Hon. Justice O’NEILL

    法院的命令是:(1)申请人被允许修订申请书,以依赖提交作为A、B和C展品的修订计划和文件。 (2)根据《1979年环境规划及评估法案》第8.15(3)条款的规定,申请人应支付由于修订申请书作为B和C展品而被废弃的应诉人的费用,费用可按协议或评估确定。 (3)上诉被驳回。 (4)位于Ashfield市布鲁斯街5号,开发申请号2022/815的现有建筑拆除和住宅公寓楼建设申请被拒绝。 (5)除第1展品之外的展品将被退还。 您的尊贵法官。

    Sanford LegalPikes & Verekers Lawyers
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, Div 4.11, ss 4.15, 4.65, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWCOSTSLeave to file application out of timeCosts sought by wife in relation to substantive property proceedings and associated stay proceedings

    Court Rules in Favor of Wife: Husband to Cover Costs in High-Stakes Property Dispute

    2022-09-07 Hon. Justice HANNAM PARRAMATTA

    批准妻子超时提交有关财产诉讼的费用申请。 丈夫按约定或根据妻子在2018年7月28日提起的,最终由法官Foster于2021年3月12日判决的实质性财产诉讼支付妻子的费用。 丈夫按约定或根据丈夫在2021年7月16日提起并由Foster法官判决的滞留诉讼支付妻子的费用。 注意:命令的形式取决于法院记录的录入。 注意:根据《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021》(Cth)第10.14(b)条款,本法院判决理由的副本可能会进行审核,以纠正微小的印刷或语法错误,或根据第10.13条款记录命令的变化。 根据1975年《家庭法法案》(Cth)第121条,除非在非常有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法诉讼中的人物、相关人物或证人的诉讼是违法的。 特此注意,根据《1975年家庭法法案》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,本法院根据Yusuf & Yusuf的化名批准发布此判决。

    Sanford Legal
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117
    Read case brief
  • CRIMEappealsappeal against sentencedomestic violence offences

    Court of Appeal Rescinds Harsh Sentence in Domestic Violence Case, Prioritizes Rehabilitation Over Punishment

    2022-07-21 Hon. Justice BEECH-JONES

    法院允许上诉。上诉得以通过。法官对申请人于2020年11月9日在地方法院判处的刑罚被撤销。取而代之,根据1999年新南威尔士州刑事(判刑程序)法案第53A条的规定,判处一个总共8年的刑期,从2020年3月9日开始,到2028年3月8日结束;其中,5年为最低刑期,从2020年3月9日开始,到2025年3月8日结束;另外3年为余下刑期,从2025年3月9日开始,到2028年3月8日结束。

    Sanford Legal
    Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 37(1)
    Read case brief
  • LAND LAWCaveatsExtension of operation of caveatSerious question to be tried

    Caveat Dismissed: Court Rejects EJS Developments' Bid to Block Trust Distribution in Wentworthville Dispute

    2021-03-30 Hon. Justice KUNC

    动议延长检查期限的通知被驳回。

    Sanford Legal
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 5 results