LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
101 cases linked to Swaab · sorted by most recent
Firm:Swaab
  • SUCCESSIONContested grant of Thai willExecuted in circumstances where testatrix ill with cancerPrimary judge held testator had capacity

    Court Upholds Contested Thai Will as Matriarch Amy's Final Testament, Rejects Claims of Mental Incapacity

2024-09-11 Hon. Justice BELL
Mills OakleySwaab
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56
Read case brief
  • CRIMEproceeds of crimewhere proceedings brought by the Australian Federal Police under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)monies held in various accounts with Australian banks

    Court Ruling: New Applicants Granted Share of $1.14 Million in Proceeds of Crime Case

    2024-07-29 Hon. Justice DHANJI
    Thomson GeerBaker McKenzieSwaab
    Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • CRIMEproceeds of crimewhere proceedings brought by the Australian Federal Police under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)monies held in various accounts with Australian banks

    Court Unveils New Distribution Plan for $421,000 in Fraudulent Funds Amid Rising Claims

    2024-07-24 Hon. Justice DHANJI
    Thomson GeerBaker McKenzieSwaab
    Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONHome Building Act 1989contract to undertake residential building worknon est factum

    Construction Costly Blunder: Tiler Ordered to Pay $317,000 for Defective Waterproofing on Marrickville Apartments

    2024-07-04 Hon. Justice WAUGH

    原告对第一被告的判决金额为317,707.93美元。将此事列入2024年7月12日星期五上午9:30的法官指示。

    Swaab
    Civil Liability Act, 2002
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSwinding upfailure to comply with statutory demandpresumption of insolvency

    Court Rules No Winners in Insolvency Battle: Each Party to Bear Their Own Costs

    2024-06-27 Hon. Justice MCGRATH

    法官准许原告撤诉,并未就费用作出命令,意在让每一方自行承担费用。

    Swaab
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 98
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONalterations and additionsvehicle turntablenew fencing and street tree removal

    Mosman Court Approves Controversial Alterations, Including Vehicle Turntable and New Fencing in Streetscape Makeover

    2024-06-19 Hon. Justice WASHINGTON AC

    法院命令:(1)上诉被支持。 (2)对于Mosman的89 Spit Road,DP 602239中的第72号地段的半独立住宅的改建和扩建,包括建造车辆转盘和硬化停车区,获得了发展许可证的批准。 (3)所有展品将被退回,除了展品A,C,1,3和4。

    Swaab
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICEinterlocutory relief pending appealapplication for leave to appeal from interlocutory injunction preventing steps being taken in pending Malaysian proceedingswhether applicant should be permitted to advise High Court of Malaya of existence of appeal and hearing set down at end of May

    Judicial Tug-of-War: NSW Court Intervenes in Malaysian Legal Dispute Amid Urgent Appeal

    2024-05-09 Hon. Justice LEEMING

    法官命令将在2024年5月29日举行的上诉请愿传讯。法官会很快通知各方,听证会是单独听取请愿或与申请人寻求的同时听证。被告必须在2024年5月20日或之前提交意见书;申请人必须在2024年5月24日或之前提交答辩意见书。双方必须在2024年5月24日或之前提交共同或单独的年表。申请人必须在2024年5月27日下午4点之前提交四份包含各方意见和年表的文件。其他细节是关于案件指令,涉及了相关公司和费用。

    Swaab
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREAntisuit injunctionsApplication to restrain party from continuing proceedings in foreign jurisdiction

    Court Grants Anti-Suit Injunction: Australian Ruling Restraints Plaintiff's Actions in Malaysian Legal Battle

    2024-04-25 Hon. Justice SWEENEY

    法院指出,第一、第二、第四和第五被告就损害赔偿作出了通常的承诺。原告本人、其雇员、代理人或其他方式,在进一步的命令前,被禁止直接或间接地在以下诉讼中采取任何进一步行动:(i)马来西亚高等法院的诉讼WA-24NCvC-5741-12/2023针对第四和第五被告(Low Teo登记的费用申请);以及(ii)诉讼WA/24NCvC-569-02/2024,即就Senibina Murni SDN BHD和Senibina Sentral SDN BHD的财产登记的费用申请(除了停止这些诉讼)。原告本人、其雇员、代理人或其他方式,在进一步的命令前,不得对据称源自原告和被告之间所称控告的协议的权利提起与被告相关的进一步诉讼,该控告在原告于2023年5月5日在本法院提交的修订的诉状中提出。原告应支付被告在2024年2月23日就祈祷1b、1d和2的动议的审理中的成本及杂费。

    Swaab
    Jurisdiction of Courts (Foreign Land) Act 1989 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPleadingsStriking outNo issue of principle

    Court Slams Defendant's Bid to Dismiss Employment Case, Orders Costs to Plaintiff

    2024-04-18 Hon. Justice KUNC

    法官驳回被告的动议,并要求被告支付费用。

    Swaab
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Pt 13, r 13.4
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSwinding upjust and equitable groundappointment of liquidators and receivers

    Court Rules on Winding Up of Controversial Marina Project Amid Shareholder Split

    2024-02-18 Hon. Justice MCGRATH

    The text discusses the importance of maintaining order in the courtroom. It emphasizes the role of the judge in maintaining decorum and ensuring that proceedings run smoothly. The judge's authority and respect are highlighted as essential for upholding order in the courtroom.

    Swaab
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSindemnity costsplaintiff sues former director in respect of invalid appointment of his wife as company secretary and entering into series of unauthorised loans to provide working capital for his building companydirector maintained the lie to the end

    Court Slams Director with $20M Compensation Order in High-Stakes Company Scandal

    2024-01-30 Hon. Justice REES

    法官下达了赔偿和费用命令。

    Sparke Helmore LawyersSwaab
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), section 1317H
    Read case brief
  • ENVIRONMENTAL OFFENCES: pleas of guilty to six offences concerning the supply of false or misleading information about wasteapplicable sentencing principleswhether offences committed intentionallyenvironmental harm caused by the commission of the offences

    Waste Mismanagement: Elmustapha Fined $263,000 for False Reporting in NSW Landfill Scandal

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice PEPPER

    请看第[120]条法官命令。

    Swaab
    Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, ss 3A, 21A, 23
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYequitable remediesinjunctionsinterlocutory injunctions

    Court Issues Injunction Against Former Employee Over Disparaging Claims: Aland Care Pty Ltd Seeks to Protect Business Reputation

    2023-11-29 Hon. Justice ROBB

    这篇文章主要讨论了法官下令开庭审理案件的权力和职责,以及对法官在处理案件过程中的行为和决定的要求,以确保公正和合理。同时也提到了对法官在法庭上的尊称使用。

    Swaab
    Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 – Australian Consumer Law, s 18
    Read case brief
  • CRIMINAL LAWfailure to notify the regulator of a notifiable incidentSENTENCEobjective seriousness

    Workplace Safety Breach: Manager Fined $4,500 After Serious Injury Incident

    2023-11-16 Hon. Justice STRATHDEE

    法官判被告有罪,罚款6000美元,因认罪可以减免25%,最终被告需支付4500美元罚款。根据1996年新南威尔士罚款法第122(2)条款,罚款的50%需支付给原告。根据1986年新南威尔士刑事诉讼法第257B条款,被告需支付原告同意或评定的诉讼费。

    Swaab
    Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONContested probatetestamentary capacitywhere testatrix was undergoing treatment for metastatic cancer

    Court Upholds Testamentary Wishes: Australian and Thai Wills Clash in Contested Probate Case

    2023-11-09 Hon. Justice GRIFFITHS AJ

    2022年6月17日提交的经进一步修订的诉讼请求被驳回。 2022年2月25日提交的第一个交叉索赔获准。 根据《1898年(新南威尔士省)遗嘱和管理法》第42(4)条的规定,未能完全或部分遵守第42(2)和(3)条规定的要求不得阻止颁发遗嘱认证。 应授予对已故Amonrat Chanta于2020年6月24日起草的遗嘱的庄严形式遗嘱证书给Kijchai Yongpairojwong。 除非任何一方在此后14天内提出异议,否则以下命令适用于成本: (a)截至2023年3月3日,已故Amonrat Chanta的遗产承担各方的成本,但不包括两份专家医疗报告的成本; (b)原告随后支付第二被告的成本,包括家庭赡养权请求的成本; (c)第二交叉被告支付有关于2022年2月25日提交的交叉索赔的交叉索赔人的成本。

    Mills OakleySwaab
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98
    Read case brief
  • APPEALbuilding information certificate appealgabion retaining walldrainage

    Court Upholds Appeal in Mosman Gabion Wall Dispute: Key Compliance Orders Issued

    2023-09-06 Hon. Justice ESPINOSA

    法院命令如下:(1)上诉被支持。 (2)自这些命令的日期起的2个月内,申请人应根据Partridge Hydraulic Services制定的计划进行工程(工程)作业,该计划编号为2017H0137,图纸SW 1.1修订A,日期为2023年8月,该计划包含在附件A中。 (3)完成工程后7天内,申请人将向被告提供以下文件的副本:(a)有关工程专家的书面证明,证明工作符合计划;和(b)由相关工程专家签署的工程图纸。 (4)在得到被告书面通知后的7天内,申请人需允许被告授权人员对其进行房产保密检查。 (5)法院指示被告在收到[17](3)]中确定的信息后的14天内,对于于2023年4月12日在NSW规划门户上提交的建筑信息认证申请编号BIC-15083的建筑发出建筑信息认证证书。

    HWL EbsworthSwaab
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 6.25, 8.25
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONswimming poolconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Grants Green Light for Controversial Swimming Pool Amid Local Appeals

    2023-06-14 Hon. Justice BISH

    法院命令: (1) 撤销上诉。 (2) 开发申请DA2021/1199,该申请寻求在存款计划873454的第202地块上进行树木清除、土方工程、支撑结构、园林美化和建造游泳池,经同意决定,并受到附件A中的条件的约束。

    HWL EbsworthSwaab
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationconsent sought for the extension of a previously approved internal lift to access a roof terracesite is listed as an item of local heritage significance and assessed as having State heritage significance

    Heritage Heist: Court Rejects Lift Proposal That Threatened Darlinghurst’s Architectural Integrity

    2023-03-26 Hon. Justice DIXON

    法院命令:(1)上诉被驳回。 (2)关于在达令赫斯特利物浦街262号批准扩建内部电梯的发展申请号D/2021/169,被拒绝。 (3)除了A,1,3,4和5号展品外,其他展品归还。

    Sydney LawSwaab
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREFather’s application to adduce additional expert evidenceAssessment of r 7.08 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)

    Court Concludes Father's Bid for Extra Evidence Falls Flat in Ongoing Family Law Battle

    2023-03-14 Hon. Justice ALTOBELLI SYDNEY

    2022年12月9日提交的一项申请被驳回。除非经高级司法注册官或法官批准,否则禁止申请人父亲提交任何在诉讼中的申请、对传票的反对通知,或者在修正的申请或答辩中寻求临时命令,直到最终审理此案件为止。请注意:法院记录的条目可能会对该命令的形式进行修改。请注意:这份裁决书的副本可能会经过审核,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(家庭法)规则的规定10.14(b) (Cth)),或者记录根据规则10.13进行的对命令的变更。根据1975年澳大利亚家庭法案(Cth)第121条,除非在极其有限的情况下,发布涉及家庭法诉讼中的人员、关联人员或证人的案件是违法的。值得注意的是,根据《1975年澳大利亚家庭法》(Cth)第121(9)(g)条的规定,本法院以Vader & Dantes为化名批准了本判决的发布。

    Swaab
    Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYWhere the husband has always had a high income earning capacityPost

    High Stakes Divorce: Court Orders Property Sale and Financial Settlement in Schaars Family Law Battle

    2023-01-19 Hon. Justice ALTOBELLI SYDNEY

    The wife and husband agree to divide up the property and settle the balance. The wife will make two lists, one headed "a" and one headed 'B', which she will divide equally among the remaining items in the property. The husband will retain all of his title and interests in the following things: All furniture and contents currently in his custody, custody nor control; any motor vehicle in his possession; any funds standing to him credit in any bank, credit union or building society account; his shareholding and without limitation on the generality with the foregone in Dpty, E Poty L, and F

    Pearson Emerson Family LawSwaab
    Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) ss 117, 123, 124, 125
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWjurisdictional factsapplicability of State Environment Planning Policy 65whether application of SEPP 65 was a matter for the Court or the consent authority to determine

    Court Upholds Council's Apartment Development Approval Amidst Disputed View Issues

    2022-11-16 Hon. Justice MACFARLAN AT [1]

    (1) 请求被驳回。(2) 上诉方需支付第一被申诉方的上诉费用。

    Swaab
    Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 (NSW), s 135
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYWhere the applicant husband seeks to split proceedings regarding the parties’ Binding Financial Agreement (“BFA”)Where the respondent wife seeks for the BFA issue to be heard as part of one combined proceeding which includes substantive determination on spousal maintenance and property adjustment

    Court Splits Case Over Binding Financial Agreement Amid Allegations of Family Violence

    2022-10-18 Hon. Justice GILL CANBERRA

    根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法庭(家庭法)规则》第10.10条款(Cth),本尊敬法院裁定拆分诉讼作为门槛问题确定以下事项: (a) 是否根据1975年家庭法案(Cth)第90G条款,此项2019年4月10日的财务协议具有约束力; (b) 是否根据1975年家庭法案(Cth)第90K条款,应该撤销2019年4月10日的财务协议; (c) 是否根据1975年家庭法案(Cth)第90F条款,财务协议中的4.1至4.3条款是无效的。 此案件移交至高级司法注册官,以进一步作进展方向,包括在我面前决定任何配偶赡养问题的未来。 注意:该命令的形式取决于法院的记录。 注意:这份法院的判决原因说明的副本可能会经过审核,以纠正小的印刷或语法错误(根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法庭(家庭法)规则》第10.14(b)条款),或根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法庭(家庭法)规则》第10.13条款记录命令的变化。 根据1975年家庭法案(Cth)第121条款,在非常有限的情况下,公开识别家庭法诉讼中涉及的人员、相关人员或证人的诉讼是犯罪行为。 值得注意的是,根据1975年家庭法案(Cth)第121(9)(g)条款,本法院以马龙和马龙的化名批准刊登此判决。

    FGD Family Lawyers SydneySwaab
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 75, 79, 90F, 90G, 90K, 90SF
    Read case brief
  • MODIFICATION APPLICATIONChildcare Centreconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Approves Extended Outdoor Hours for Hunters Hill Childcare Centre: Parents Celebrate Modification Win

    2022-09-14 Hon. Justice HARDING AC

    法院命令如下:(1)上诉得以支持。(2)根据《1979年环境规划与评估法》第4.55(8)条的规定,批准向法院提交的修改申请,该申请旨在修改法庭于2020年2月21日批准的发展申请编号为2019-1002的发展许可。环境法庭诉讼编号为2019/89953,修改申请旨在变更猎人山(Ryde Road 32号,地块1,DP 845479)托儿所内儿童户外玩耍时间,修改内容见判决附件“A”。(3)法院修改后的发展申请编号为2019-1002的发展许可,受限于本判决附件“B”中列出的发展许可的综合条件。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersSwaab
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979,
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREApplication for recusal on the basis of actual bias and apprehended biasWhere the application for recusal is limited to procedural hearings

    Court Denies Father's Requests for Recusal and Adjournment in Ongoing Family Law Battle

    2022-08-11 Hon. Justice HARPER

    对于被告父亲(“父亲”),延长时间以便在2022年9月5日案卷关闭之前提交并送达一份更新的合并审判陈述书。 父亲在2022年7月13日提交的寻求休庭的申请将被驳回。 父亲在2022年8月8日提交的寻求回避的申请将被驳回。 对发给E学校的传票的时间安排进行修改,并在时间安排的第2段末尾添加以下文字:“包括与“[F计划]”相关并与Y相关的文件”。 对发给NSW警察的传票的异议被驳回。 准许独立儿童律师发出必要的进一步传票。 注意:法院记录将对命令的形式进行记录。注意:根据《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法庭(家庭法)规则2021(Cth)》第10.14(b)规定,本判决书的副本可能会进行修订以纠正次要的排印或语法错误,或者根据《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家庭法庭(家庭法)规则2021(Cth)》第10.13规定记录命令的变动。根据1975年(Cth)家庭法案的第121条,公布涉及家庭法案件的人员、关联人员或证人身份的诉讼属于犯罪行为,除非在非常有限的情况下。根据1975年(Cth)家庭法案的第121(9)(g)条,本法院在使用Vader&Dantes这个化名下公布本判决的行为已获得批准。

    Swaab
    Read case brief
  • 12345›

    Page 1 of 5 · 101 results