LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
55 cases linked to Sydney Law · sorted by most recent
Firm:Sydney Law
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALalterations and additions to former warehouse and change use to commercial office premisesconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Greenlights Major Warehouse Transformation in Chippendale: Appeal Upheld for Commercial Office Development

    2023-12-19
Hon. Justice ESPINOSA

法院命令:(1)上诉获得支持。(2)对于Chippendale的19-21 Buckland Street的D/2022/1359开发申请,包括对一座以前的仓库建筑进行改建和增加,包括拆除现有楼层、保留外观并建造额外的三层楼,并将该地点用作商业办公场所,决定通过授予同意,但必须遵守附件A中的条件。

Sydney LawReid Legal
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 7.32, 8.7
Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWjudicial reviewjurisdictional factsplaintiff made a complaint to the President of the Anti

    Court Dismisses Racial Discrimination Case: Delegate's Decision Upheld Amid Controversy

    2023-12-18 Hon. Justice STERN

    法官命令原告的传票和简易判决动议被驳回,原告需要支付传票和简易判决动议的费用,如果不能达成一致,将由法官进行评估。

    Sydney Law
    Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW), ss 4, 7, 17, 20C, 24(1)(b), 51, 53, 87, 87A, 87B, 89, 89A, 89B, 90, 90B, 91A, 91C, 92, 92A, 92B, 92C, 93A, 93B, 93C, 94C, 102, 103, 105, 108
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDERfire safetyconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Modifies Fire Safety Order for Sydney High-Rise After Conciliation Agreement

    2023-11-29 Hon. Justice PEATMAN AC

    法庭命令:(1) 上诉得到支持。 (2) 发展控制命令 FIRE/2023/11, 于2023年3月23日发给申请人,涉及悉尼国王街135号(作为792149号存款计划的152号地块),于2023年9月20日进行了修改,根据1979年环境规划与评估法第8.18(4)(b)条款,在附件A中列出的条款进一步修改。您的尊贵的法官,我提出给您的意见。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.18, 9.34, Sch 5 Pt 2, cll 23, 27
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONbuilding signagewhether sign is a building identification signheritage conservation

    Heritage Meets Innovation: Court Approves New Illuminated Signage for Iconic Sydney Tower

    2023-10-26 Hon. Justice HORTON

    法院裁定:(1)上诉获得支持。(2)对于在悉尼马丁广场25号现有建筑物安装新的照明顶部标识的发展申请编号D/2022/1103,批准在附件A中列出的条件下授予同意。(3)所有陈列品除了A、L和N号陈列品外,均退还。

    Sydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.7
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONresidential apartment developmentresidential flat building in SP5 Metropolitan zonewhether apartment design guide is mandatory

    Court Greenlights Controversial Sydney Apartment Development Despite Sunlight Concerns

    2023-10-18 Hon. Justice HORTON

    法院裁定:(1) 接受上诉。 (2) 对于开发申请D/2022/643,允许拆除所有现有建筑物,建造带地下层停车场的住宅公寓楼,包括地下室停车场、一楼公共房间和地面以上的住宅公寓,在悉尼厄斯基恩街41-45号DP 75062地块进行,但需遵守附件A的授予条件。(3) 所有展品均归还,除了展品A、B、C。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Architects Act 2003
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONdemolition of part of a former warehouse building and construction of a hotel including ancillary usesinsufficient environmental planning grounds to justify the exceedance of the height of buildings development standardthe provisions in the Sydney Development Control Plan 2012 regarding warehouse buildings older than 50 years apply to the existing building notwithstanding that the site is not identified as a local heritage item

    Court Rejects Controversial 17-Storey Hotel Proposal on Sussex Street, Citing Heritage Concerns

    2023-09-28 Hon. Justice O’NEILL

    法庭的法官命令如下:(1)申请人获得批准修改申请并依赖修改后的提案。(2)根据《规划与评估法》第8.15(3)条的规定,申请人应支付因修改申请而产生的被告的费用,费用可以协商或经评估确定。(3)上诉被驳回。(4)位于悉尼苏塞克斯街311-317号的拆除现有结构、挖掘三个地下室层并建造17层酒店及附属设施的发展申请D/2023/10被拒绝。(5)除了第7号和A号展品外,其他展品被退还。

    Sydney LawPiper Alderman
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.7, 8.15
    Read case brief
  • APPEALbuilding information certificateconciliation conferenceagreement reached

    Court Orders Building Certificate Issued After Successful Appeal: Alexandria Homeowner Triumphs in Dispute

    2023-09-20 Hon. Justice GRAY

    法院责令:(1)上诉获得支持。 (2)根据1979年环境规划和评估法案8.25(3)的规定,被告被指示在收到申请人提交的有关BC / 2023/34日期为2023年3月3日的适当建筑工作计划后的28天内,向申请人发放建筑信息证书,该建筑信息证书记录了BC / 2023/34的实际建筑工作。 (3)如果被告未能在(2)满足后21天内发放建筑信息证书,则申请人有权透过动议通知的方式向法院申请恢复该事项。

    Sydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.25
    Read case brief
  • EVIDENCEadvance ruling as to use of evidence at trialguillotine orderno leave sought to adduce expert evidence after expiry of guillotine order

    Legal Guillotine Cuts Plaintiff's Expert Evidence: Court Rules Out Key Reports Ahead of Trial

    2023-08-14 Hon. Justice RUSSELL SC

    1. 根据《1995年新南威尔士州证据法》第192A条的命令,原告在于2023年8月28日开始的这起诉讼的庭审中无法提供或依赖于Ian Burn先生于2023年3月31日或4月19日的报告。 2. 命令原告支付第一被告因于2023年8月9日提交的动议所产生的费用及附带费用。 3. 将对这些费用最终是否由原告的律师个人承担的问题保留以便日后决定。

    Sydney LawDi Lizio & Associates
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 192A
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONalterations and additions to an existing hotelconciliation conferenceagreement between the parties

    Court Greenlights Hollywood Hotel Expansion: Changes Approved Amid Cost and Compliance Disputes

    2023-08-09 Hon. Justice O’NEILL

    法庭的命令是:(1) 申请人须在28天内支付因申请修改而产生的被告费用,金额为$7,700。(2) 上诉被支持。(3) 2022年发展申请编号D/2022/200,针对新南威尔士州2010年Surry Hills区Foster街2号的商业开发进行改建和增加,经修改后被批准,但需遵守附件A的同意条件。您的尊贵法官。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationcentrebased childcare facility

    Newtown Court Upholds Controversial Childcare Development Amid Community Concerns

    2023-07-26 Hon. Justice DIXON

    法院命令如下:(1) 申请人被允许依赖于修订后的发展申请。(2) 上诉被支持。 (3) 发展申请编号为D/2022/199,经修订以在Newtown NSW 2042的20-28 Munni Street上移除树木并建设一个可容纳56名0-5岁儿童的两层中心托儿所,通过发展许可决定,受到附表“A”中的许可条件的约束。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Education and Care Services National Regulations, reg 108
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: consent sought for substantial demolition of existing building and construction of a twentystorey boarding houseremitted matterwhether the proposed development exhibits design excellence

    Sydney Court Greenlights Ambitious 18-Storey Boarding House Project

    2023-07-24 Hon. Justice DICKSON

    法庭命令如下:(1)上诉被支持。(2)发展申请D/2021/304意味着对现有建筑进行改建和增加,其中包括拆除并建造一座18层的宿舍楼,底层零售,平台停车场,两层地下室带游泳池,附属储藏室,设备房,垃圾间和自行车停车场于哈曼市海码头93-105号(地块2 DP 408335),经同意书授予同意条件为附件A。 (3)所有展品都已退还,除了展品1、C和2022年4月28日提交法庭的最终建筑计划需要保留。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.15
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONalterations and additionsheritageconciliation conference

    Heritage Appeal Wins: Glebe Home Set for Major Renovation

    2023-07-13 Hon. Justice PORTER AC

    法院裁定:(1)上诉被支持。(2)开发申请编号D/2022/673经修改,涉及对现有住宅进行改建和增加,包括在格利布托克塞思路43号建造后部两层增加部分、游泳池、双车库、景观设计、排水和相关工程,在附录A中规定的批准条件下获得开发许可。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    Court Greenlights Major Residential Development in Alexandria: Appeal Upheld and New Dwelling Approved

    2023-07-11 Hon. Justice WALSH

    法院命令:(1)上诉被支持。(2)发展许可被批准,建筑申请D / 2021/1474,已经修改,用于拆除现有建筑并在地下室存储和游泳池上建造新的住宅,包括移除树木,地点在亚历山德里亚花园街100号,受附带的同意条件和附件A的限制。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • LOCAL GOVERNMENTelectionswhether irregularity in election of councillorswhether councillors disqualified from holding civic office

    Councillors Cleared: Court Upholds Election Validity, Extends Deadline for Appeal

    2023-06-21 Hon. Justice ARMSTRONG

    法官命令将申请时间延长至2022年6月22日。然后法官否决了该申请。

    Sydney Law
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONeffect of proposed development on heritage significanceconciliation conferenceagreement between parties

    Sydney Court Greenlights Heritage-Compatible Awning Development at Iconic Martin Place

    2023-06-21 Hon. Justice HORTON

    法院秩序如下:(1)法院行使1979年《新南威尔士土地和环境法院法》第39(2)条规定的行使《环境规划和评估法规》2021年第38(1)条规定的同意机构的职能,同意申请人通过包括和替换(视情况而定)附件A中所指的修改后的计划和文件,在2022年12月12日提交法院的发展申请D/2022/602进行修改。 (2)上诉被支持。 (3)为在悉尼25马丁广场7楼(广场层)安装外部可伸缩遮阳篷的发展申请D/2022/602授予发展同意,受到《附件A》中同意的限制条件。 您荣耀/她荣耀/他荣耀表示同意。

    Sydney LawDentons
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 4.16, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONamended proposalno contentionsone disputed condition of consent

    Court Greenlights Potts Point Development Amid Controversy Over Spa Pool

    2023-06-08 Hon. Justice O’NEILL

    法院的命令是:(1)申请人被允许修改申请,依赖于附件A的同意条件中列出的文件。 (2)上诉被支持。 (3)拆除现有建筑并在Potts Point的30A-34 Brougham Street上建造六分之一、四分之一高的住宅楼的发展申请编号2022/319,经同意,但受附件A的同意条件限制。 (4)除附件1和A之外的展品被归还。您的/她/他的尊荣指法官的尊称。

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.7
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTY SETTLEMENTWhere the parties were married for 18 yearswhere there are two adult children of the relationship

    Family Law Showdown: Court Divides Assets After 18-Year Marriage Amid Claims of Violence and Financial Secrecy

    2023-05-16 Hon. Justice MURDOCH PARRAMATTA

    以下是上述文本的中文简述: 该文本描述了一份关于B街、C郊区的房产的婚姻协议。根据协议,丈夫将保护妻子不受该房产相关的任何责任,并且需要支付给妻子一笔金额为$240,966的款项。此外,丈夫需要以自己的费用将他在D街、C郊区的房产转让给妻子,并支付该房产的相关贷款。而妻子需要签署文件来解除B街、C郊区房产上的限制,并且需要将在银行账户中持有的资金根据协议进行分配。最后,根据协议,除上述房产外,丈夫和妻子在婚姻结束后将各自拥有自己名下的其他财产和个人物品。同时,如果任何一方不履行协议,则有法院指派的注册处官员负责执行协议并提交相关文件。此外,如果有关费用的申请未引起异议,则会由法官决定。

    Sydney Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 75(2), 79, 79(4)(d)-(g), 102NA, 106A
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationAPPEALbuilding information certificate

    Paddington Heritage Battle: Court Dismisses Three Appeals Over Unauthorised Terrace Additions

    2023-05-08 Hon. Justice PULLINGER AC

    法院命令: 关于案件2022/88816(发展申请上诉), 裁定如下:(1)上诉被驳回。 (2)除1、2、3、4、8、U和V之外的证据退还。 关于案件2022/88827(建筑信息证书上诉), 裁定如下:(1)上诉被驳回。 (2)除1、2、3、4、8、U和V之外的证据退还。关于案件2022/115594(发展控制令上诉), 裁定如下:(1)上诉被驳回。 (2)除1、2、3、4、8、U和V之外的证据退还。

    Sydney LawHall & Wilcox
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 1.3, 4.15, 8.7, 8.18, 8.25, Div 9.3, Sch 5
    Read case brief
  • NONPUBLICATION ORDERorders made to redact the judgment in order to protect the applicant’s identity due to assistance given to authoritiesorder necessary to protect the applicant’s safety

    Court Shields Informant's Identity: Non-Publication Order Secures Safety for 30 Years

    2023-04-18 Hon. Justice ADAMSON

    根据《法院镇压和不公布命令法案2010》第7(a)和(b)款的规定,以及以下理由:a. 该命令对保护任何人的安全是必要的;和/或b. 就公共利益而言必要制作该命令,并且公共利益明显超过了公开司法的公共利益。从2022年12月7日法院判决的部分不得公布,该部分揭示或倾向于揭示:c. 上诉人作为警方通知人的地位;d. 上诉人提供协助给警方的事实;和/或e. 该协助的性质和程度;此等命令适用于从这些命令日期起的30年期间,并遍及澳大利亚联邦全境。 在法院固有管辖权的行使中,上诉人与本程序的相关身份将以“AXR”代号为标识。 根据《法院镇压和不公布命令法案2010》第7(b)款的规定,以及以下理由:a. 该命令对保护任何人的安全是必要的;和/或b. 就公共利益而言必要制作该命令,并且公共利益明显超过了公开司法的公司利益;法院作出了警察专员、新南威尔士州警察队在2022年12月19日的适用申请中寻求的命令,并进一步规定:c. 上诉人于2022年10月14日宣誓的词证书;d. 本申请的内容,以揭示上诉人寻求保护的事项为限;e. 上诉人于2022年12月20日的书面提交。此等命令适用于自这些命令日期起的30年期间,并遍及澳大利亚联邦全境。

    Sydney Law
    Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), ss 8, 12
    Read case brief
  • APPEALdevelopment applicationconsent sought for the extension of a previously approved internal lift to access a roof terracesite is listed as an item of local heritage significance and assessed as having State heritage significance

    Heritage Heist: Court Rejects Lift Proposal That Threatened Darlinghurst’s Architectural Integrity

    2023-03-26 Hon. Justice DIXON

    法院命令:(1)上诉被驳回。 (2)关于在达令赫斯特利物浦街262号批准扩建内部电梯的发展申请号D/2021/169,被拒绝。 (3)除了A,1,3,4和5号展品外,其他展品归还。

    Sydney LawSwaab
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 8.7
    Read case brief
  • APPEALs 56A of Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW)cl 6.21 of the Sydney Local Environmental Planproper construction of design excellence clause

    Court Overturns Commissioner’s Approval of Developer's DA, Citing Design Flaws and Lack of Consent

    2023-03-16 Hon. Justice DUGGAN

    The text in paragraphs 115 to 117 discusses the circumstances under which a judge can issue an order for a specific action to be carried out. The text also explains the importance of complying with the judge's orders and the consequences of failing to do so.

    Mills OakleySydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • REMOVAL APPLICATION ‑ Applicant applies for consent for designated development ‑ submitter lodges objection ‑ Applicant appeals to Court against deemed refusal of development application ‑ submitter notifies Registrar exercising right to be a party to the proceedings ‑ Registrar records submitter as Second Respondent to Applicant's appeal ‑ Applicant files Notice of Motion seeking to have Second Respondent removed ‑ Applicant alleges notification to Registrar made after the expiry of the permitted statutory time period for such notification ‑ two possible dates when Council might be taken to have notified the submitter of the Applicant's appeal ‑ Applicant relies on earlier date for the commencement of the statutory period ‑ submitter relies on the later date for the commencement of the statutory period ‑ position advanced by the Applicant correct ‑ submitter’s notification to the Registrar made after the expiry of the statutory period ‑ administrative action taken by Registrar based on (incorrect) assumption conveyed by submitter ‑ appropriate to remove the submitter as the Second Respondent to the proceedings.JOINDER APPLICATION ‑ submitter applies to be joined as party to the proceedings ‑ submitter advances ten contentions proposed to be raised if joined ‑ consideration of whether any of the submitter’s proposed contentions raise matters which would otherwise not be sufficiently addressedconsideration of Council’s contentions ‑ submitter’s contentions different from those raised by the Councilone of the submitter’s contentions potentially warrants joinder as a party ‑ Applicant raises discretionary issues against joinder

    Court Decision Shakes Up Sydney Development Plans: Objector's Fight Not Over Yet!

    2023-02-15 Hon. Justice MOORE

    请查看[135]和[136]号订单,以及[137]号指示。

    Sydney Law
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 8.12
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACTSbreach of contractwhere defendant ceased payments under agreement for the sale of a businessplaintiff entitled to amount owing under that contract

    Court Cuts Business Deal: Purchase Price Slashed in Contract Breach Ruling

    2023-02-09 Hon. Justice RICHMOND

    《商务交易法案》第237和242条规定,反诉人有权要求根据销售协议将“购买价格”从300万美元减少到210万美元,并将贷款协议下的“预付款”从150万美元减少到60万美元。原告有权获得判决,要求支付60万美元及自交易完成之日起按年利率8%计算的利息,扣除已支付的利息金额。

    Sydney Law
    Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Sch 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 18, 236, 237, 242
    Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONINTESTACY AND DISTRIBUTION ON INTESTACYADMINISTRATION OF ESTATEELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

    Court Grants Letters of Administration to Deceased's Mother in High-Stakes Intestacy Battle

    2023-02-02 Hon. Justice CROW

    根据注册员的正式要求,予以授予维吉尼亚·珊瑚·梅登对利亚姆·罗文·迪隆遗产的无遗嘱遗产管理书信。

    Sydney Law
    Read case brief
  • 123›

    Page 1 of 3 · 55 results