LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
7 cases linked to The Family Lawyer · sorted by most recent
Firm:The Family Lawyer
  • FAMILY LAWParentingfinal hearingcare arrangements for two children aged 8 and 5

    Court Orders Parenting Plan Amidst Bitter Family Law Battle: Equal Responsibility as Children Forge Bonds Across Distance

    2023-08-10 Hon. Justice BROWN ADELAIDE

根据以上内容,双方对于2014年生的孩子X和2017年生的孩子Y(以下简称“孩子们”)享有平等的共同监护责任。孩子们与母亲生活在一起。孩子们与父亲的时间如下: (a)每隔一个周末,从周五下午6点到周日下午5点(或者如果周一是公共假日,则是周一下午5点)从2023年8月18日开始;如父亲能够在区域C与孩子们度过周末,父亲需提前至少28天提供书面通知给母亲,父亲将在周五放学后至周一上学开始与孩子们度过时间。 (c)在圣诞学校假期期间如下:父亲的每个交替周末时间将在前三次交替中延长,以便每个场合的时间在8个晚上后于周六下午5点结束。然后,孩子们将与母亲一起度过剩余的学校假期期间,并在新学年的第一个周五恢复与父亲的交替周末时间,除非父亲上次学校假期时间在假期最后一个周六结束,那么父亲的交替周末时间将恢复在新学年的第二个周五进行。 如果父亲能够在4(b)至(f)段中提及的任何特殊场合在区域C与孩子们共度时间,父亲需提前至少28天书面通知母亲,父亲将在周五放学后至周一上学开始与孩子们共度时间。 除非双方书面协议另有约定,交接将按照以下方式进行:(a)在M镇的麦当劳进行交接,如果父亲搬到南澳大利亚北部地区,则交接将在N镇服务站进行;或(b)在孩子们的学校进行交接,如果时间相对于学校来说可以在学校开始或结束。 双方都有权参加任何涉及孩子们的需要父母参与的事件,包括:(a)体育比赛;(b)允许父母参加的课外活动;以及(c)允许父母参加的学校聚会和事件,包括但不限于音乐会、学校集会、运动日、家长教师面谈、食堂工作和社交活动。母亲需在每个学期开始前通知父亲,她将孩子们参加的体育或课外活动,并提供活动时间表/日程表的副本。 母亲被限制并且禁令已经授予,未经父亲事先书面同意或本法院的命令,母亲不得变更孩子们在南澳大利亚C区的主要居住地。 根据澳大利亚1975年《家庭法》第121条第9款第g项的规定,本法院获得了使用化名公布本判决的批准。

The Family LawyerThe Law Project
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Pts VII, XI, Div 4, ss 4, 4AB, 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 61DA, 65DAC, 65DAE, 68B, 102NA, 114
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWParentingwhere the mother seeks to relocate with the children back to City Bwhere the father seeks that the children remain living in the Region C

    Court Rules in Favor of Mother’s Relocation, Prioritizing Children’s Best Interests in Parenting Arrangement

    2023-05-18 Hon. Justice BETTS NEWCASTLE

    本文提到父母对于2017年生的孩子X和2020年生的孩子Y享有平等共同的监护责任。同时,母亲被允许在2023年学年结束后将孩子们迁居至D地区。在学期期间,孩子们将与父母住在一起,具体安排由双方父母以书面形式协商达成,但如果无法达成一致意见,将按照以下方式进行:第一周(3天夜晚):(a) 周日下午4点至周三上午9点与母亲同住;(b) 周三上午9点至周六上午9点与父亲同住。双方父母打算将文中提及的第4学期假期时间进行改变,以使每个父母拥有相同的时间段,并且每年轮流交替,但这一变更将在孩子们发展到适宜时进行。如果父母在这一变更上无法达成一致意见,则他们将参加FDRP调解,如果问题无法解决,则可以向法院申请变更此命令。此外,这些命令还作为对孩子们的医疗、健康、体育和教育提供者的授权,以便向任何一方父母提供有关孩子们的进展、健康和其他需求的信息。此命令还允许双方父母提供任何可能需要的书面授权,并告知对方父母有关任何这些医疗、健康、体育和教育服务提供者的姓名和地址。最后,法院根据《家庭法典》1975年(澳大利亚联邦)第121(9)(g)条的规定,核准了本判决的伪名发布,伪名为Halsey和Darlow。

    The Family LawyerParker Coles Curtis
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), Part VII
    Read case brief
  • Aggravated burglary, theft of firearms, theft. Breach of trust by stealing from relatives. Firearms not recovered. Modest but relevant prior criminal history. Very high degree of cooperation which was of high value and comes at high risk to safety of accused. Plea during pandemic. Crown concession that CCO open.

    Family Betrayal: Grandson Sentenced to Community Corrections After Gun Safe Heist from Grandmother's Home

    2023-03-30 Hon. Justice DEMPSEY
    The Family Lawyer
    Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), Sentencing Act
    Read case brief
  • COSTSgross sum costs orderCivil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c)specified gross sum costs orders already made in long running and strongly contested proceedings among family members in relation to the estate of a deceased parent

    Court Hands Down Landmark Ruling in Grant Family Estate Battle: $664,457 Awarded Amidst Controversial Claims and Counterclaims

    2022-10-27 Hon. Justice SLATTERY

    根据法庭判决,额外指定的一次性费用令得以执行,涵盖原告截至2022年6月10日的费用。法庭对第二被告占用房产进行了利益补偿,金额为83200美元。其他费用也被判决支付。同时,法庭指示计算利息的方法。

    The Family Lawyer
    Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSgross sum costs orderCivil Procedure Act 2005, s 98(4)(c)long running and strongly contested proceedings among family members in relation to the estate of a deceased parent

    Family Feud Escalates: Court Orders Lump Sum Costs in Bitter Estate Battle

    2022-06-09 Hon. Justice SLATTERY

    指定总费用顺序作出。根据法院关于所使用方法的理由,要求提供指定总费用的计算方式的指导。

    The Family Lawyer
    Bankruptcy Act 1966, ss 57 and 58
    Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONadministration of a deceased estateconsequential ordersin earlier judgments in these proceedings the second defendant, the registered proprietor of certain real estate (the Killcare property) was found to hold that real estate on trust for a deceased estate represented by the plaintiff as administrator ad litem

    Legal Storm: Court Orders Sale of Contested Killcare Property Amid Family Feud

    2022-02-10 Hon. Justice SLATTERY

    原告被委任为死者遗产的执行人,但关于Killcare房产的出售除外。另外任命Mr Dornan作为该房产的销售执行人。法庭下令出售Killcare房产。对第一被告做出对Killcare房产的占有判决,支持委任为销售执行人的执行人。

    The Family Lawyer
    Probate and Administration Act, 1898, s 73.
    Read case brief
  • COSTSIndemnity costsan application for indemnity costs is brought by the successful party following judgment delivered on 24 September 2020whether indemnity costs should be awarded on the basis of that judgment’s findings of significant misconduct against the unsuccessful parties.

    Court Orders Indemnity Costs Over Allegations of Misconduct in High-Profile Estate Battle

    2021-01-04 Hon. Justice SLATTERY
    The Family Lawyer
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 7 results