LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
2 cases linked to Tonkin Legal Group · sorted by most recent
Firm:Tonkin Legal Group
  • FAMILY LAWfinal parenting orderswhere parties live substantial distance from one anotherwhere one party is not the biological parent of one child

    Court's Parenting Ruling Establishes Shared Responsibility Amid Complex Family Dynamics

    2023-09-20 Hon. Justice O'SHANNESSY MELBOURNE

    在此命令中,母亲和父亲需共同承担孩子的健康、教育和其他事务上的责任。在财产出售所得方面,父亲需支付一定金额给母亲,并且需要根据相关法律进行相应的税务申报。另外,法院也就父亲的退休基金作出了决定,将一定金额分配给母亲。这篇报道已经获得法院批准在假名下发布。

Tonkin Legal Group
Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth)
Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWAPPEALCOSTSWhere the appellant sought to discontinue the appeal at the eleventh hour

    Court Upholds Father's Rights: Appeals Discontinued, Mother Ordered to Pay Costs of Over $10,000

    2021-09-29 Hon. Justice STRICKLAND ADELAIDE

    1. 2021年6月23日提交的上诉通知被驳回。 2. 上诉方母亲需支付被上诉方父亲的费用,金额为10,332.38澳元。 注意:该命令的形式将根据法庭记录的入口而确定。 注意:根据《联邦法院及澳大利亚家庭法庭(家庭法)规章2012》第10.14条款(b),本判决原本中的轻微排印或语法错误可能会经过修正,或根据第10.13条款进行修改。 根据《1975年澳大利亚家庭法案》第121条,除了极少数情况外,公布涉及家庭法律程序中的人员、关联人员或证人的诉讼是违法的。 特此注意,本法院根据《1975年澳大利亚家庭法案》第121条(9)(g)的规定,同意以Burrough&Fagin代名字发布本判决。

    Tonkin Legal GroupSebastian Rubera & Associates Pty Ltd
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 2 results