LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
12 cases linked to Varess · sorted by most recent
Firm:Varess
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision by the Immigration Assessment Authority (“IAA”)whether the IAA made findings that were unreasonable, irrational or illogicalapplication dismissed

    Court Upholds Immigration Authority's Decision: Sri Lankan Asylum Seeker's Bid for Protection Visa Dismissed

    2024-09-05 Hon. Justice LAING SYDNEY
Varess
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 473DD
Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONProtection Visawhether Immigration Assessment authority’s decision affected by jurisdictional errorwhere no error established in Immigration Assessment authority’s decision

    Court Upholds Immigration Decision, Dismisses Afghan Applicant's Protection Visa Appeals

    2024-05-29 Hon. Justice VASTA BRISBANE

    要求已更改的申请被驳回。 申请人支付应用程序的第一被申请人费用,固定金额为$8,371.30。 注意:订单的形式受到记录进入法院的影响。 注意:法庭可以修改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排印或语法错误(根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2分部)通用联邦法规2021(Cth)第17.05(2)(g)),或者记录根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2分部)通用联邦法规2021(Cth)第17.05对订单的变更。

    Clayton UtzVaress
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth): s 473DC, s 5J(3)
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONSafe Haven Enterprise VisaWhere the Authority failed to consider whether or not the applicant would engage in further political activityWhere there was inconsistencies in translated documents

    Court Overturns Immigration Authority Decision, Grants Safe Haven Visa to Kurdish Iranian

    2024-04-07 Hon. Justice D HUMPHREYS PARRAMATTA

    法庭裁定 - 维持裁定 - 颁发证明状,撤销2018年9月7日第二被告确认第一被告代表拒绝向申请人发放庇护签证的决定。 - 颁发强制令,将此事移交给机构,并要求其按照法律对代表的决定进行复审。 - 颁发禁令,禁止移民、公民和多元文化事务部长及其代表、公务员和代理人对机构的决定进行操作或生效。 - 第一被告的名称更改为“移民、公民和多元文化事务部长”。 - 第一被告应支付申请人费用,费用为12500美元。 - 注意:裁定的形式取决于法庭记录的输入。 - 注意:法庭可以修改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排印或语法错误(根据《2021年联邦法院和家庭法院规则》)。

    MinterEllisonVaress
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5AAA, 5H, 5J, 36, 56, 473CB, 473DB, 473DC, 473DD
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONImmigration Assessment AuthorityCosts disputeAssessment of costs

    Court Orders $16,000 in Costs Amid Migration Visa Dispute: A Cautionary Tale for Legal Practitioners

    2023-12-19 Hon. Justice D HUMPHREYS PARRAMATTA

    第一被申请人应支付申请人的费用,金额为16000美元。此金额须在此命令日期后的28天内支付。 注意:命令的形式取决于法院记录中的条目。 注意:法院可变更或撤销判决或命令以纠正小的排版或语法错误(依据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院规则2021年第17.05(2)(g)规定),或记录根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院规则2021年第17.05规定的命令变更。

    Varess
    Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021(Cth) s 214
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONseparate questionmeaning of ‘at the time of the referral’ in s. 473CB(1)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)separate question answered no

    Court Ruling: Migration Authority's Decision on Afghan Refugee Challenge Dismissed

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice ALSTERGREN SYDNEY

    由第一被告在2022年6月17日提起的诉讼中申请的特定问题应回答如下: 问题: 在2020年8月18日向第二被告(机构)颁发一份托拉斯硕位令,要求其依法确定其代表第一被告(部长)的代表决定对申请人(代表的决定)进行快车审查的审核之后,部长根据《1958年移民法》(Cth)第473CA条将代表的决定提交给机构后,部门秘书在其控制或占有的材料是否能够满足《1958年移民法》(Cth)第473CB(1)(c)中描述的“部门秘书(在提交决定给机构时)认为与审核相关的任何其他材料”? 答案: 否。 成本保留。 注:法院可以更改或撤销判决或命令以纠正轻微的排印或语法错误(r 17.05(2)(g)《2021年联邦法庭和澳大利亚家事法庭(第2部) (通用联邦法律)规则》(Cth)),或记录根据r 17.05《2021年联邦法庭和澳大利亚家事法庭(第2部) (通用联邦法律)规则》(Cth)的命令变更。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersVaress
    Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s. 33
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREwhether party should be required to file evidence addressing searches undertaken in response to a notice to producewhere documents requested in notice to produce do not relate to any ground currently before the Courtwhere the evidence does not suggest that compliance with the notice to produce is insufficient

    Court Dismisses Evidence Request, Sets Stage for February Showdown

    2023-09-21 Hon. Justice LADHAMS PERTH

    申请人的非正式申请被法院拒绝,要求法院命令第一被告提交并送达一份法庭说明书,以解答申请人于2023年9月4日提交的提交通知要求之事项。原定于2023年10月12日的听证会被取消。该案件计划于2024年2月9日上午11:00在AWST / 下午2:00在AEDT进行最终听证会。关于这些命令的原因将在稍后由法庭室公布。注意:命令的形式取决于法庭记录中的输入。注意:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正微小的排印或语法错误(2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第2分部)(普通联邦法律)规则》第17.05(2)(g)),或根据2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第2分部)(普通联邦法律)规则》第17.05记录命令的变更(CTH)。

    Clayton UtzVaress
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 473CB, 476
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONcostswhere the matter was conceded on the basis of a ground pleaded in a further amended application filed some years after the commencement of the proceedings and three weeks before hearingwhere proceedings were nonetheless attended with a level of procedural, factual and legal complexity

    Court Orders $15,000 Cost to Applicant in Complex Migration Case Amidst Legal Errors by Immigration Authority

    2023-07-27 Hon. Justice LAING SYDNEY

    根据上述文件,裁决已达成,第一被申请人需支付申请人15000澳元的费用。请注意,判决书的格式应遵循法院的记录入口。此外,法院有权变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和家庭法庭(第2部分)(一般联邦法)规则》第17.05(2)(g)条款,或根据2021年《联邦法庭和家庭法庭(第2部分)(一般联邦法)规则》第17.05条款记录对判决的变更)。

    Varess
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 473DC(1), 473DD
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONWhether reasonable to conclude no real chance of harm by reason of applicant keeping a “low profile”whether applicant unable to take reasonable steps to modify immutable foreign profile characteristics

    High Court Scrutinizes Afghan Refugee's Visa Plight: Appeals Court Demands Fresh Review Amid Concerns of Persecution Risks

    2023-03-30 Hon. Justice GIVEN SYDNEY

    The Court may rescind or alter an order made by the Federal Court, including a decision made on December 15, 2017. It may also make a new order.

    Varess
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5J, 395
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONCosts principlesscale costswhether Affidavit required to justify departure from scale

    Court Awards $8,371 in Costs to Migrant After Ruling in Minister's Case

    2023-03-30 Hon. Justice GIVEN SYDNEY

    第一被申请方必须支付申请人出庭费用和杂费,金额为8,371.30澳元。注意:法庭记录表可能影响判决形式的适用。注意:根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2部)(一般联邦法)规则》(Cth)第17.05(2)(g)条款,法庭可以修改或撤销判决或命令以更正次要的印刷或语法错误,或根据2021年澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2部)(一般联邦法)规则第17.05条款进行变更的记录。

    Varess
    Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (General Federal Law Rules) 2021 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for remedies under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (Act) in relation to a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming a decision not to grant a protection visawhether the Tribunal misconstrued or misapplied the test for wellfounded fear of persecution in relation one of the applicant’s claims for protection

    Court Rejects Asylum Seeker's Claims: Tribunal's Decision Stands Amid Concerns Over Persecution Risks

    2023-02-09 Hon. Justice MANOUSARIDIS SYDNEY

    The first respondent is dismissed and the name of the second respondent changed to Minister for Immigration, Citizenship & Multicultural Affairs. The applicant pays the firstrespondent's costs set at the amount of $5,000.

    Mills OakleyVaress
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 45AA, 476
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONWhether a failure by the Authority to refer to the “reasonably foreseeable future” test amounted to jurisdictional errorwhether the failure by the Authority to refer to the test ought to give rise to a finding that the Authority did not intellectually engage on the question of what would happen in the reasonably foreseeable futurejurisdictional error established

    Judicial Victory for Asylum Seeker: Court Quashes Flawed Immigration Decision, Calls for Fresh Review

    2022-11-27 Hon. Justice EGAN BRISBANE

    对第一被告的名称进行修改为“移民、公民和多元文化事务部长”。 2021年11月24日提交的修订评审申请应被批准。 要取消2018年9月10日移民评估局的决定。 颁发一项责令状,要求移民评估局根据法律对申请人对第二被告决定的评审申请进行裁决,并将此事移交给移民评估局重新审理。 为了再次决定申请人的申请,应由与2018年9月10日做出决定的成员不同的成员组成移民评估局。 申请人需在2022年11月28日下午4点前提交书面意见,有关费用问题。 第一被告需在2022年11月29日中午12点前提交书面答辩意见,有关费用问题。 费用问题将根据文件来决定。 注意:命令的形式受到法庭记录的影响。 注意:法院可能会因为进行微小的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和家庭法院法》(第2部分)(澳大利亚联邦)一般联邦法规1717号(CTH)规定的17.05(2)(g)条款),或者根据2021年《联邦法庭和家庭法院法》(第2部分)(澳大利亚联邦)一般联邦法规1717号(CTH)17.05条款记录有关命令的变动而修改或撤销判决或命令。

    Varess
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s. 473CB
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming decision not to grant the applicant a protection visarelocationwhether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant’s claims regarding his lack of personal, familial, religious or tribal connections

    Court Overturns Visa Denial: Pakistani Applicant Wins Right to Have Case Reassessed Amidst Questions of Family Safety

    2022-08-11 Hon. Justice LAING SYDNEY

    2022年6月30日,申请人提出的中间申请,寻求重新开放他的案件的请假被拒绝了。 颁发一项查证状,废除第二被申诉人于2018年1月31日确认第一被申诉人代表的决定(代表决定),拒绝给予申请人保护签证。 颁发一项命令状,指示第二被申诉人按照法律重新审查代表决定。 注意:订单的形式受到法院记录的影响。 注意:根据《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法案第2部分(总体联邦法)规则2021年》,法院可以变更或撤销判决或订单,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法案第2部分(总体联邦法)规则》记录订单的变更。

    Varess
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 12 results