LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
13 cases linked to WMD Law · sorted by most recent
Firm:WMD Law
  • COSTSparty/partycosts of proceedings concerning right of carriagewaywhere plaintiff substantially but not entirely successful

    Court Ruling Clears the Path: Defendants Ordered to Pay 80% of Legal Costs in Carriageway Dispute

    2024-02-08 Hon. Justice HENRY

“除诉讼程序中另有命令外,被告应按照协商或评估的普通基础支付原告诉讼费用的80%。”

WMD Law
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 98(1)
Read case brief
  • LAND LAWEasementsUse of easementsWhether excessive use by parking and storing boats and items on right of carriageway or towing a boat by forklift of certain dimensions

    Court Ruling Protects Right of Way: Excessive Boat Parking Leads to New Restrictions

    2023-12-13 Hon. Justice HENRY

    这段文字讨论了法官对案件的调查和判决,以及对法官职责和权力的讨论。

    WMD Law
    Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREinterlocutory applicationspayment of money into courtlease dispute

    Court Denies Tenant's Bid for Rent Relief in Lease Dispute with Bexgrove

    2023-08-31 Hon. Justice PARKER

    这篇文章描述了一个案件中法官的命令。 honorific title for "judge"通常是“your/her/his HONOR”。

    WMD Law
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, r 43.2(3)(c)
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYMatter settledapplication for costsrelevant considerations.

    Bankruptcy Battle: Court Rules Both Parties to Foot Their Own Bills in Costly Dispute

    2023-06-22 Hon. Justice CAMERON SYDNEY

    The court orders that the costs of the proceeding be borne by the parties themselves.

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 32
    Read case brief
  • SUCCESSIONadministration of estatesBenjamin Order made

    Family Feud in the Courts: Benjamin Order Sees Estate Distribution Amidst Mystery of Missing Beneficiary

    2023-04-18 Hon. Justice RICHMOND

    本杰明下订单。费用将由遗产按赔偿性质支付。

    WMD Law
    Read case brief
  • TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS)agreement between the partiesconciliation conferenceorders

    Neighbourly Trees in the Court: Magnolia Pruned, Retaining Wall Restored!

    2022-08-09 Hon. Justice DOUGLAS AC

    请见第25条命令。

    WMD LawCorbett Jessop Law
    Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s34(3), s34 (10)
    Read case brief
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEDUREAdjournmentWhere the mother sought an adjournment on the first day of the trial

    Family Court Grants Adjournment: Mother's Turnaround Opens Door for Children’s Relationship with Father

    2022-07-18 Hon. Justice ALTOBELLI SYDNEY

    申请人提出的订单是根据分钟来确定的,标记为“A”,日期为当天,并附在此处。 独立儿童律师和M心理学家(“L女士”)被要求尽快向孩子们解释这些命令。 独立儿童律师被指示向L女士提供以下内容的副本: (a)今天发布的判决理由;和 (b)N女士于2021年12月16日发布的单一专家报告。 该案件定于2022年9月6日上午9点进行提及,以确定今天所定的命令的执行情况。 如果出现任何与今天所做命令的执行有关的问题,各方被准许在七天的通知期内申请重新列案,但在行使这一权利时,寻求重新列案的人士应:(a)立即通知其他各方申请的意图和原因;(b)根据澳大利亚联邦巡回法院和家庭法院有关与法庭联系的协议提出重新列案的请求;以及(c)与重新列案的通知同时向其他各方提供将被寻求的订单的分钟,如有意见,还应附带党参与的证据。 到目前为止,父亲在诉讼中产生的费用被保留。 注意:订单的形式受到法院记录的影响。 注意:根据澳大利亚联邦巡回法院和家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021(Cth)第10.14(b)条款,本文所载的法院判决理由可能会进行审查以纠正一些次要的排版或语法错误,或根据澳大利亚联邦巡回法院和家庭法院(家庭法)规则2021(Cth)第10.13条款的规定记录订单的变更。 根据1975年澳大利亚联邦家庭法案第121条,除非在极其有限的情况下,发布确定参与家庭法诉讼的人、相关人员或证人的诉讼是违法的。

    WMD LawSwifte Law
    Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60B, 60CA, 60CC, 61DA, 65DAA, 102NA
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYCOSTSWhere orders made affirming orders made by registrarwhere orders made dismissing an application for review

    Court Orders Costly Consequences: Applicant to Pay $28,328.85 in Bankruptcy Case Ruling

    2021-12-22 Hon. Justice A KELLY MELBOURNE

    申请人需支付被申述方的费用,金额为$28,328.85。 注意:判决书的形式应符合法院记录的规定。 注意:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规第2部分》(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05(2)(g)),或者根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规第2部分》(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05记录对命令的变更。

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • COSTSParty/PartyGeneral rule that costs follow the eventApplication of the rule and discretion

    Court Ruling: Plaintiffs Ordered to Cover 70% of Defendant's Costs After Disputed Outcome

    2021-11-28 Hon. Justice REIN

    请参见[18]。

    WMD Law
    Nil
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYTrusts and trusteesResulting trustsPresumption of advancement

    Family Feud Escalates: Court Rules on Contested Bowral Property Ownership Amidst Allegations of Trust and Gift

    2021-10-18 Hon. Justice REIN

    请参阅[176]-[177]。

    WMD Law
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • BANKRUPTCYapplication to set aside bankruptcy noticeapplication to extend time within which to comply with bankruptcy noticewhere parties engaged in protracted litigation

    Court Ruling Ends Prolonged Bankruptcy Drama: Debtor's Appeals Hit Another Wall

    2021-10-05 Hon. Justice A KELLY

    根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》(以下简称《法院法》)第202-203节的规定,直接允许各方以视频和音频链接的方式在法庭上出庭并发表意见。 对于于2021年9月10日提起的复议申请,驳回该申请。 确认于2021年8月19日作出的第2段命令。 驳回延长履行于2021年5月27日发出的破产通知的时间的申请。 在2021年10月12日星期二下午4点前,各方提交并交付关于本申请费用的任何意见,包括其中的金额(不超过三页)。 任何有关费用的申请将在书面上决定。 注:该命令的形式须根据法院记录进行记录。 注:本判决理由的副本可能经过审查以纠正小的排版或语法错误(根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》第17.05(2)(g)条款规定),或记录根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》第17.05条款对命令的变更。

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 30, 40, 41, 52 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 180 Legal Profession Act 2004
    Read case brief
  • APPEALSincompetencewhere relief sought in notice of appeal includes setting aside money judgment against a defendant other than the appellantwhere appeal not brought by or on behalf of other defendant

    Court Strikes Down Appeal for Costly Judgment, Demands Security from Impecunious Director

    2021-03-31 Hon. Justice MEAGHER

    该文主要内容如下: (1)要求在上诉人的上诉通知书中,将第3项要求中对于第2项要求的引用删除。 (2)要求上诉人根据《2001年联邦公司法》第471B条,向法庭提出申请,允许其对Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd进行上诉,申请必须在14天内提交并送达。 (3)暂停此诉讼程序,直到上诉人(a)按照下述第4项规定提供对被上诉方上诉费用的担保,以及(b)将Pages Equipment Holdings Pty Ltd加入到上诉人的被上诉方中为止。 (4)上诉人在21天内提供对被上诉方上诉费用的担保,金额为60,000美元,可以通过将该金额支付到法庭或以上诉人和被上诉方在2021年4月15日之前商定的其他形式提供担保。 (5)上诉人支付于2020年12月23日提交的动议的被上诉方费用。

    WMD Law
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 41(6A)
    Read case brief
  • STATUTORY INTERPRETATIONmeaning of “option to purchase” and “option granted for the purchase” in Division 9 of Part 4 of Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)whether “option to purchase” includes put optionsheld that “option to purchase” should be construed as an option in the nature of a call option that gives holder or grantee the right to purchase property

    Court Ruling Clears Up Confusion Over Call and Put Options in NSW Property Sale Dispute

    2021-03-21 Hon. Justice DARKE

    对于被告方的交叉索赔,单独的问题回答是"是",对交叉索赔方有利。

    WMD Law
    Conveyancing (Sale of Land) Amendment Act 1990 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 13 results