LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
86 cases linked to Wotton + Kearney · sorted by most recent
Firm:Wotton + Kearney
  • MIGRATION LAWapplication for extension of timeconsideration of whether a migration decision under s 477(3)(c) of the Migration Act 1958 has been madewhether second respondent failed to exercise its jurisdiction in making its decision

    Justice Denied: Migration Court Rejects Extension for Malaysian Woman's Protection Visa Appeal

2023-06-22 Hon. Justice YOUNG MELBOURNE

申请被驳回。 如果没有达成一致,申请人应支付第一被申请人的费用,金额待确定。 注意:订单的形式需要登记在法院的记录中。 注意:根据 2021 年《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规》(第二部门)(联邦通用法规)规则第 17.05(2)(g) 条款,法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令以纠正小的排版或语法错误,或根据第 17.05 条款记录对订单的变更。

Wotton + Kearney
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 36(1A), 36(2)(a), 36(2)(aa), 36(2A)(c)-(e), 476A(3)(a), 477(1)-(2), 477(3)(c), 5(1), 5H(1)(a), 5J(1)(a), 5J(2), 5J(3), 5J(4), 5J(5)(b)-(c), 5J(5)(d)-(f), 91R
Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWdomestic tribunalsexpulsion of a memberprocedural fairness

    Court Upholds Ortho-Bionomy Australia’s Expulsion of High-Profile Member Amid Controversy

    2023-06-21 Hon. Justice RICHMOND

    要求被驳回并须负担费用。

    Wotton + KearneyAubrey Brown Lawyers
    Corporations Act 2011 (Cth), s 140(1)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSParty/PartyCourt’s discretionProper characterisation of the “event”

    Insurance Clash: Court Decides Cost Fate in High-Stakes Tower Showdown

    2023-06-14 Hon. Justice PEDEN

    (1) 双方应在此命令生效后的7天内协商并向彭登法室提供一份同意的简短记录,以落实这些原因。 (2) 如果无法达成协议,则在此命令生效后的10天内,应提供竞争性的简短记录和不超过2页的简要提交意见。

    Lander & RogersMills OakleyAllensDLA Piper+3
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56-60, 101
    Read case brief
  • PROCEDURECOSTSDISCONTINUANCE OR WITHDRAWAL FROM PROCEEDINGwhere the plaintiff is the owner of an industrial property

    Legal Tug-of-War: Court Reserves Cost Ruling in Concrete Dispute Saga

    2023-06-13 Hon. Justice FREEBURN

    第三方程序的费用应保留。当事方应就申请的费用进行听证。

    Wotton + KearneyHickey LawyersDoyles Construction Lawyers
    Read case brief
  • Summary dismissalno question of principle

    Legal Setback: Court Dismisses Gurjit Singh's Case, Orders Him to Cover Defendants' Costs

    2023-05-31 Hon. Justice BEECH-JONES AT CL

    根据《统一民事诉讼规则13.4》,应当驳回诉讼程序。第一申请人Gurjit Singh应支付被告的诉讼费用。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Supreme Court Act 1969 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • Practice and Proceduresummary dismissalno question of principle

    Swift Justice: Court Upholds Summary Dismissal in Key Case Decision

    2023-05-17 Hon. Justice BEECH-JONES AT CL

    In order to provide a summary in Chinese, we would need the actual text in English or any other language. Without the text, it is not possible to summarize anything.

    Neil LawyersWotton + Kearney
    Judicial Officers Act 1986 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSwhether offer of compromise limited to costs contained requisite degree of compromiseCOSTSwhether costs ought be ordered in a gross sum

    Court Rules $600,000 Costs Against Plaintiff After Police Taser Incident; Legal Team Not Off the Hook!

    2023-05-04 Hon. Justice ADAMSON

    根据2022年5月23日的命令,并根据下述命令,命令原告在2021年9月2日及之前按照普通基准赔偿被告的费用,之后按照赔偿基准赔偿。上述费用总额为60万美元。对于被告对原告提出的赔偿费用申请以及要求以总额形式支付诉讼费用的申请,对原告和被告之间的费用不作任何裁定,意图是原告承担自身费用,被告承担自身费用。驳回被告要求第二和第三被告对其向被告承担的费用责任进行赔偿的申请。命令被告支付第二和第三被告在上述(4)中提到的被告申请费用。根据受影响的任何一方享有提出不同判决的权利,此类申请需以书面形式提交给我的助理,同时附上任何可能被依赖的宣誓书或书面陈述,期限为本判决书日期的七天内。

    Wotton + KearneyGilchrist Connell
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 3B
    Read case brief
  • INSTITUTIONAL LIABILITYDamagesJudge awarded damages for personal injury arising from historical sexual abuse, including general damagesWhether quantum of general damages manifestly excessive

    High Court Upholds $1.9 Million Judgment in Historic Child Abuse Case Against Catholic Archbishop

    2023-03-14 Hon. Justice BEACH
    Wotton + KearneyRightside Legal
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWdisciplinary proceedingsinterpretation of Enterprise Bargaining Agreement (“EBA”)whether actions of the employer breached the EBA

    Court Upholds Employer's Actions in Complex Disciplinary Dispute: Application Dismissed

    2023-03-09 Hon. Justice VASTA BRISBANE

    2022年2月18日提交的申请被驳回。 法庭注意到: 除非已提起上诉或法庭已收到一方书面请求要求提供书面理由,否则法院不会提供今天宣判的理由的书面版本。 注意:判决书的形式需记录在法院档案中。 注意:法院有权更改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正小的排字或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和家事法院法规》第17.05(2)(g)款)或记录对判决的变更(根据2021年《联邦法庭和家事法院法规》第17.05款)。

    Wotton + KearneyAshurst
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth): s 50, s 545(2)(b)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSOffer of compromise made in accordance with UCPR r 20.26Indemnity costs sought pursuant to r 42.15AWhether genuine offer of compromise

    Court Ruling: Defendants Awarded Indemnity Costs Following Genuine Offer to Compromise in Legal Battle

    2023-02-09 Hon. Justice CHEN

    在2016/144762诉讼案中:(1) 变更于2022年12月22日作出的第2项命令,具体如下:要求原告按照常规标准支付被告的费用,直至2018年7月26日,按照常规标准进行评估,之后按照赔偿基础进行评估。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • TORTSNegligenceFall over balcony wallReasonable foreseeability

    Court Rules in Favor of Landlords in Balcony Negligence Case: Tragic Fall Leaves Family Devastated

    2022-12-21 Hon. Justice CHEN

    2016/144762案件中:(1)被告方判决。 (2)要求原告支付被告方的诉讼费用。2019/75534案件中:(1)被告方判决。 (2)要求原告支付被告方的诉讼费用。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • TORTSpower to stop, search and detaintrespass to the personfalse imprisonment

    Justice Prevails: Court Awards $320,000 for False Imprisonment in NSW Police Misconduct Case

    2022-12-15 Hon. Justice FITZSIMMONS SC

    (1)对原告做出判决,赔偿金额为320,000美元。 (2)被告需要按照普通基准支付原告的费用,除非另有命令。 (3)展品可以退还。 (4)如需进一步命令,可以提前7天通知进行申请。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) pt 2, ss 3B(1)(a), 11, 43A,
    Read case brief
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDURECOSTSApplication to stay orders for costs after dismissal of proceedings pending resolution of fresh proceedings commenced by the plaintiffs on substantially the same causes of action or for substantially the same relief as the dismissed proceedingsHELD

    Legal Clarity: Court Rejects Cost Stay in Rejected Proceedings

    2022-12-06 Hon. Justice HAMMERSCHLAG IN EQ

    申请停留被拒绝。

    Sparke Helmore LawyersWotton + KearneyMullane & Lindsay
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CRIMINAL LAWprosecutionwork health and safetyduty of persons undertaking business

    MMP Industrial Fined $262,500 for Negligence in Worker Safety: A Wake-Up Call for Employers

    2022-11-23 Hon. Justice SCOTTING

    1. MMP Industrial Pty Ltd被判有罪。 2. 适当的罚款是35万澳元,减少25%以反映有罪认罪。 3. 我判处262,500澳元罚款。 4. 作为同意或评估的一部分,违法者需支付起诉方的诉讼费用。 5. 根据1996年的《罚款法》第122(2)条款,罚款的50%应支付给起诉方。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
    Read case brief
  • INSURANCEConstruction of a general liability policyWhere plaintiff is a subcontractor of a subcontractor of the named insuredWhether sub

    Court Ruling: Sub-Subcontractor Left in the Cold as Insurer Denies Coverage After Workplace Fire

    2022-11-23 Hon. Justice PEDEN

    (1)修正传票被驳回。 (2)原告支付被告根据协议或评估确定的费用。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Read case brief
  • ACCIDENT COMPENSATIONAppealWorkplace injurySerious injury

    Court Rules Injury from Truck Delivery Not a 'Transport Accident' in Landmark Case

    2022-10-19 Hon. Justice MCLEISH
    Wotton + KearneyWisewould Mahony
    Read case brief
  • EVIDENCEPractice and procedureWhether rule in Browne v Dunn applied

    Court Ruling: Key Evidence on Intoxication Admitted in Dramatic Balcony Fall Case

    2022-10-13 Hon. Justice CHEN

    被反对的报告部分(第9.2节的第2和第3点,9.3节,9.4节,9.5节,12.2节和12.3节)被视为证据。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDURECommencement of proceedingsLeave to commence actionwhere plaintiff in custody

    Court Grants Green Light for Historic Legal Action: Inmate's Bid to Sue Over Alleged School Abuse Approved

    2022-08-22 Hon. Justice ADAMSON

    准许原告提出起诉状以进行诉讼。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 154F
    Read case brief
  • Court Orders Major Adjournment in Wacker vs. Van Dyke: Claims of Negligence and Possible Brain Injury Under Scrutiny

    2022-07-27 Hon. Justice SCHMIDT AJ

    1. 截至2022年7月29日,原告应提供所有在2022年4月19日和7月22日的出示通知中要求提供的记录。 2. 截至2022年8月3日,韦勒先生应向被告提供他根据传票(S-29)提供的所有文件的日志,对其中声明特权的文件。 3. 截至2022年8月10日,被告应通知原告对任何所声明特权的争议。 4. 如果存在有关特权的争议,原告应在2012年8月17日或之前提交和送达一份动议、支持性宣誓和陈述,该动议将在一个待定的日期听证。 5. 被告双方被授予查阅相关诉讼中根据传票提交的文件的权利,这些诉讼正在一起进行。 6. 原告应在2022年7月25日、26日和27日支付被告的诉讼费用,以及因诉讼的延期而产生的费用,费用金额可以协商或评估确定。 7. 双方可立即商议或评估这些费用,但在诉讼的最终判决作出前不得支付。 8. 如果对原告作出判决,执行判决将被暂停,直到根据第6项命令协商或评估的费用被确定,并且还必须与判决金额相抵销。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersWotton + Kearney
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 66, 98
    Read case brief
  • INSURANCELiability insuranceDirectors and OfficersClaim for indemnity and declaratory relief against two consecutive insurance towers

    Insurers Face Off in Multi-Million Dollar Liability Battle Over CIMIC's Bribery Allegations

    2022-07-26 Hon. Justice PEDEN

    The parties are to confer and provide agreed short minutes of order to give effect to these reasons and appropriate costs orders within 7 days of the publication of this judgment. If the parties are not able to agree, they are to provide their competing short minutes together with submissions of no more than 10 pages, and any necessary evidence, within 10 days of the publication of this judgment. Liberty to apply on 24 hours’ notice is granted.

    Mills OakleyWotton + Kearney
    ASX Listing Rules r 3.1
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREjurisdictionexercise of nonfederal jurisdiction by State Court

    Trans-Tasman Legal Battle: NSW Court Upholds Jurisdiction Over New Zealand Insurer Despite Constitutional Concerns

    2022-07-19 Hon. Justice BELL AT [1]

    1. 同意上诉。 2. 上诉被驳回并需支付费用。

    Wotton + KearneyPiper Alderman
    Admiralty Act 1988 (Cth) s 9(1)
    Read case brief
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREnotice of motionFelons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW)leave to commence proceedings sought

    Justice Prevails: Court Grants Leave for Sexual Abuse Claim Under Felons Act

    2022-06-19 Hon. Justice DHANJI

    (1) 根据1981年新南威尔士恶人(民事诉讼)法案的第4条和第5条,准许原告递交逆向起诉来对被告提起诉讼。 (2) 费用将根据案情决定。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Felons (Civil Proceedings) Act 1981 (NSW), ss 4, 5
    Read case brief
  • CONSUMER PROTECTIONproduct liability claimsettlement of proceedingapproval of settlement by Court PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

    Court Greenlights Confidential Settlement: Young Plaintiff's Future Secured

    2022-06-14 Hon. Justice LUCEV PERTH

    根据2011年联邦法院规则9.70和9.71条款,《Cth》申请人和被申请人得到许可,根据附件于2022年4月27日宣誓的ENG20A的证词中的《释放协议》(以下简称“协议”)的条款来达成和解。 自本命令生效之日起14天内,代表申请人的ENG20A和被申请人应执行协议以实施和解。申请人随后得到许可同意对此案件进行撤诉。 作为该款项的受托人的公共信托公司,可自行决定从时间到时间,直至进一步的命令,根据需要将此款项的全部或任何部分的投资收入用于维护、福利和促进申请人的利益,包括但不限于支付她的持续护理、支持和需求,直至她年满18岁。 公共信托公司应于2032年1月27日向申请人支付其作为受托人持有的余额,如果有的话,当她年满18岁时,并终止该信托。 关于款项投资、受托和其他事项,有权自由申请。 根据2011年联邦法院规则2.32条款,除非有进一步的命令,2022年4月27日宣誓的ENG20A的证词及其附件应视为本诉讼中申请人的保密信息,并且直至进一步命令:(a) 必须在法庭电子档案中标记为对当事方的保密;(b) 不得让被申请人或公众查阅、在公开法庭中披露或在任何法庭记录的公开部分披露。 注:命令的形式受法院记录条目的限制。 注:法院可以根据2021年《Cth》联邦法院规则2.32条款的规定,修正或撤销一个判决或命令以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或记录对该命令的变更。

    Wotton + KearneyJulian Johnson Lawyers
    Australian Consumer Law ss 54, 55, 259(4)
    Read case brief
  • TORTSTrespass to the personAssaultwhether police conduct caused plaintiff to fear police and attempt to flee

    Court Rules in Favour of NSW Police in Case of Balcony Plunge: Plaintiff's Claims Dismissed

    2022-05-22 Hon. Justice ADAMSON

    法庭判决被告胜诉。根据以下第3项,命令原告支付被告的诉讼费用。如果任何一方希望申请不同的费用决定,只要提交书面申请,并附上申请的任何证据和论据,七天之内提交给我的助手,随后会就回应的进一步指示作出安排,以便在文件上确定费用。

    Wotton + Kearney
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3B, 5, 5L, 5O, 5R, 13, 16, 18, 21, 47, 48, 50, 52, 54
    Read case brief
  • ‹1234›

    Page 2 of 4 · 86 results