LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
32 cases linked to Holding Redlich - Melbourne · sorted by most recent
Firm:Holding Redlich - Melbourne
  • MIGRATIONprotection visa applicationapplication for judicial reviewwhether the Tribunal properly considered the Applicant’s claim that she feared being the victim of an honour killing and/or by failing to consider country information about honour killings

Court Quashes Tribunal Decision in Honour Killing Case: New Life for Applicant's Protection Visa Appeal
2023-07-06 Hon. Justice TAGLIERI MELBOURNE

裁定撤销2018年4月19日第二被申请人作出的决定。 一项强制令发出,要求由不同成员组成的第二被申请人根据法律重新考虑和审定申请人的复审申请。 申请人可以通过写信给法官Taglieri的法庭(associate.judgetaglieri@fcfcoa.gov.au)重新列出她申请的成本,以便在法庭上安排约定。 法庭注意到: 双方应努力达成一致,以就申请人的成本问题达成协议,如果达成协议,他们可以向法庭提交共识的命令小结。 注意: 订单的形式受法庭记录的影响。 注意: 法庭可以更改或撤销判决或命令,以解决次要的印刷或语法错误(r17.05(2)(g)《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法庭(第二分部)(普通联邦法律)规则》澳大利亚联邦法律),或根据r 17.05《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法庭(第二分部)(普通联邦法律)规则》(澳大利亚联邦法律)记录命令的变化。

Sparke Helmore LawyersHolding Redlich - Melbourne
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s476
Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONApplication for judicial review of decision of the Administrative Appeals TribunalProtection (Class XA) (Subclass 866) visawhether the Tribunal failed to consider the Applicants’ claims, reasoned in an illogical or irrational way and/or identified a wrong issue and asked a wrong question

    Court Rules Against Malaysian Lesbians: Protection Visa Appeal Dismissed Amid Claims of Persecution

    2023-06-26 Hon. Justice MANSINI MELBOURNE

    2022年4月27日经修订的申请被驳回。 申请人支付第一被申请人的费用,金额为5000澳元。 注:判决书的形式应与法院记录条目相符。 注:根据2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家事法院(第2分部) (总联邦法例)规则》第17.05条(2)(g),法院可变更或废除判决或决定,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或记录根据2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家事法院(第2分部) (总联邦法例)规则》第17.05条的决定变更。

    Sparke Helmore LawyersHolding Redlich - Melbourne
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss.5H, 5J, 36, 65, 474, 476
    Read case brief
  • Whether costs should be paid on a standard or indemnity basis.

    Court Orders SJH to Cover Costs in High-Stakes Legal Battle with Mike & Shan

    2023-06-15 Hon. Justice BURCHELL
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority to refuse a protection visawhere the applicant is a citizen of Lebanonwhere the applicant is a member of the Sunni sect

    Lebanese Asylum Seekers' Hopes Dashed: Court Dismisses Protection Visa Appeal in Ongoing Immigration Saga

    2023-03-13 Hon. Justice YOUNG DARWIN

    The Minister for Immigrant and Border Protection is dismissed from office. The applicant, the Minister for Consultative and Regulatory Reform, makes an application to the Federal Court for a change of name.

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATION LAWapplication for judicial reviewdecision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunalprotection (Class XA) visa

    Court Upholds Tribunal Ruling, Dismisses Ethiopian Asylum Seeker's Claims in Landmark Migration Case

    2023-03-02 Hon. Justice MERCURI MELBOURNE

    The applicant's application is dismissed. The applicant pays first respondent's costs fixed at the sum of $4,371.00. Note: This order is subjected to the entry into the court's records.

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 414, 499
    Read case brief
  • COSTSWhether defendants capitulated on the allegation of oppressionWhether Calderbank offer represented a better result for the offeree than the judgmentWhether rejection of the Calderbank offer was unreasonable

    Court Orders Share Sale in High-Stakes Corporate Dispute: Plaintiff's Claims Dismissed

    2022-12-15 Hon. Justice RIORDAN
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSApplication to inspect company register under s 173of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)Whether electronic addresses nominated by members required to be recorded on the company register

    Court Ruling: Club Must Hand Over Members' Email Addresses for Transparency Ahead of Key Vote

    2022-10-20 Hon. Justice RIORDAN
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudicial reviewJurisdictional errorReview of adjudication determinations made under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic)

    Legal Tug-of-War: School Construction Payment Claims Spark Controversy in Victoria Court

    2022-10-02 Hon. Justice STYNES
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWMisrepresentationjurisdiction of Part 31 of the FW Act

    Court Dismisses Misrepresentation Claims Against QTeachers: Teacher Union Controversy Unfolds

    2022-08-31 Hon. Justice VASTA BRISBANE

    2021年2月28日提交的申请被驳回。 注:该判决的形式应符合法院记录的要求。 注:根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院法则(第2部分)(普通联邦法规)》第17.05(2)(g)规定,法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误;或者根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院法则(第2部分)(普通联邦法规)》第17.05规定,记录对判决的变动。

    Holding Redlich - MelbourneSaines Legal
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth): Part 3-1, s 30
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWFAIR WORKApplication for costs under s 570(2) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)whether substantive application instituted without reasonable cause

    Court Denies Cost Claims in Pruessner vs. Caelli Constructions Case: A Landmark Ruling on Employment Rights

    2022-08-28 Hon. Justice FORBES MELBOURNE

    2022年4月1日提交的答辩方关于请求申请方支付诉讼费用的申请(费用申请)被驳回。 双方应各自承担诉讼费用,包括费用申请。 注意:判决书的形式应根据法院记录而定。 注意:根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家事法院(第2部分)(一般联邦法律)规则》第17.05(2)(g)项(Cth),法院可以修正或撤销一项判决或命令,以纠正轻微的印刷或语法错误;或根据2021年《澳大利亚联邦巡回法庭和家事法院(第2部分)(一般联邦法律)规则》第17.05项,记录判决的变更。

    Holding Redlich - MelbourneDavies Lawyers
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), s 570
    Read case brief
  • CORPORATIONSCorporations Act 2001 (Cth)Part 5.4Insolvency

    Mining Dispute Rocks Joint Venture: Court Sides with Olympic Domain in Battle Against Statutory Demand

    2022-07-13 Hon. Justice HETYEY ASJ
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONinjunction to restrain application of a directive restricting outside food being brought into the Villawood Detention Centre by visitorsprohibition on home cooked foodconsideration of the jurisdiction of the Court to review a decision concerning the management of detention centres

    High Court Strikes Down Controversial Food Ban at Villawood Detention Centre

    2022-06-09 Hon. Justice DRIVER SYDNEY

    1. 法庭宣布引入"外部食品政策"的决定,即第三次修订的申请的主题,是一项未得到《1958年移民法》(Cth)支持且无效的政策。 2. 在法庭进一步裁决前,自这些命令的日期起,将在21天后解除于2017年12月22日获得的臨時禁制令。 3. 否则,第三次修订的申请将被驳回。 注意:命令的形式取决于法庭记录的输入。 注意:法庭可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(即2021年《联邦法院和家庭法庭》第2部分(一般联邦法)第17.05(2)(g)规则),或记录命令的变更依据2021年《联邦法院和家庭法庭》第2部分(一般联邦法)第17.05规则(Cth)。

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1974 (Cth) s 8
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWFAIR WORKquestion of whether the applicant was an employee or independent contractor engaged through a third partyterms of oral contract

    Court Rules: Bricklayer's Claim for Employee Status Dismissed as Contractor Relationship Upheld

    2022-03-24 Hon. Justice MCNAB MELBOURNE

    1.2020年12月3日提交的申请被驳回。 2.被告提出费用申请必须在这些裁决作出后7天内提供书面陈述,申请人要在14天内提交书面回应。 3.费用问题将在办公室内根据文件决定。 注意:订单的形式取决于法院的记录输入。 注意:法院可以更改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正一些次要的排版或语法错误( 根据2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第二分部)(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05(2)(g)条 ), 或根据2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第二分部)(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05条记录对订单的变更。

    Holding Redlich - MelbourneDavies Lawyers
    Construction Industry Long Service Leave Act 1997 (Vic) ss 5, 6(1), 12.
    Read case brief
  • Failure of a person who has management or control to ensure that the workplace is safe and without risks to healthSerious and multiple failures to observe safety proceduresRisk of catastrophic injury or death high and readily foreseeableAsphyxiation caused by argon gas leak from welder left in confined space overnight

    Tragic Workplace Safety Breach: Company Fined $600,000 After Apprentice's Fatal Asphyxiation

    2022-02-28 Hon. Justice TRAPNELL
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 ss 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b), 4(2), 20(2)(a), 26(1),
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudicial reviewDecision to remove law practice from panelsFindings of non

    Legal Showdown: Steiner Firm Battles Victoria Legal Aid Over Controversial Removal from Panels

    2022-02-17 Hon. Justice KEOGH
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • MIGRATIONApplication for protection visano basis for allegation of reasonable apprehension of bias on the part of the Authorityno demonstrated jurisdictional error in the way in which the Authority arrived at its decision

    Court Upholds Authority's Decision: Sri Lankan Family's Bid for Protection Visa Dismissed

    2022-02-02 Hon. Justice EGAN

    以下是对上述文本的总结: 1. 于2021年7月21日提交的进一步修订的申请被驳回。 2. 申请人应支付第一被申请人就申请进行审查所产生的费用,金额为$7,467.00。 注:订单的形式需符合法院记录的要求。 注:根据《澳大利亚联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭规则2021年(第2部)》第17.05条款(2)(g),法院可以变更或废除判决或命令以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误,或根据《澳大利亚联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭规则2021年(第2部)》第17.05条款记录对命令的变更。

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.5(1), 5J, 36(2)(aa), 36(2A), 65, 473CB and 473DD
    Read case brief
  • ASSOCIATIONS AND CLUBSPolitical partiesAustralian Labor PartyIntervention in Victorian branch by National Executive

    Labor Pre-Selection Showdown: Court Rejects Claims Against National Executive’s Authority Ahead of Election

    2022-01-30 Hon. Justice T FORREST
    Robinson Gill LawyersHolding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudicial reviewwhere Applicant alleges that her “privacy was breached”where the Respondent declines to investigate

    Court Rules Against Privacy Breach Claim: Applicant's Case Dismissed Amid Complexity of Administrative Law

    2021-12-13 Hon. Justice VASTA BRISBANE

    1. 2020年6月21日提交的申请被驳回。 2. 申请人应支付被申请方费用,金额为7,467.00美元。 注:判决书格式需根据法院记录进入。 注:法院可以根据《2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭条例》(第二部分)(澳大利亚联邦法庭通则)》(Cth)规则第17.05款(2)(g),变更或撤销判决或命令以纠正次要的排版或语法错误,或根据第17.05款,记录判决的变更。

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth), s 5(1)
    Read case brief
  • COSTSPlaintiffs unsuccessfulTwo groups of defendants with separate representationOne set of costs appropriate

    Legal Battle Brews: Court Rules on Cost Disputes Among Defendants in Landmark ALP Case

    2021-11-15 Hon. Justice GINNANE
    Robinson Gill LawyersHolding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • COSTSPlaintiff unsuccessfulTwo groups of defendants with separate representationOne set of costs appropriate

    Court Rules Costs to Follow Dismissal in High-Profile Labor Party Case

    2021-11-15 Hon. Justice GINNANE
    Cornish Lawyers -For All Your Family Law NeedsHolding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • CONTRACT LAWAgreement providing for grant of licence to use intellectual property in Australia upon achievement of milestonesConstruction of contractWhether payments made were ‘royalties’

    Legal Battle Over Aquaponics: SAS Fails to Secure Licence in UESL Dispute

    2021-11-14 Hon. Justice SIFRIS
    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWapplicant asserted failure to consult in accordance with consultation term contained in an enterprise agreementdecision of the Fair Work Commission approving the enterprise agreement noted that pursuant to section 205 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the model consultation term was taken to be a term of the enterprise agreementconsideration of the interpretation and effect of section 205

    Court Rules Against Aged Care Union in Consultation Clause Dispute, Dismisses Application

    2021-10-21 Hon. Justice BLAKE

    2020年7月23日提交的申请被驳回。 注:判决书的形式将根据法院记录的输入而定。 注:此份判决书的副本可能会经过审查,以更正轻微的排版或语法错误(依据《澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2部分)(一般联邦法)规则2021(联邦法令)》第17.05(2)(g)规定),或根据《澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2部分)(一般联邦法)2021(联邦法令)》第17.05规定记录订单的变更。

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWCommonwealthworkplace rights and responsibilitiesgeneral protections

    Court Dismisses Case of Tech Employee's Claim After Disputed Termination During Probation

    2021-10-14 Hon. Justice JARRETT BRISBANE

    2020年4月30日提交的申请被驳回。 注:判决书的格式以法院记录为准。 注:本判决书的副本可能需要进行审查以纠正一些次要的印刷或语法错误(《2021年《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第二分部)(普通联邦法律)规则》第17.05(2)(g)条款》),或根据《2021年《联邦法院和澳大利亚家庭法院(第二分部)(普通联邦法律)规则》第17.05条的规定记录订单的变更。

    Holding Redlich - Melbourne
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 340, 344, 345, 351
    Read case brief
  • MORTGAGESAssessment of interest that would have been paid by plaintiffs to substitute financier if tender had been accepted.DECLARATIONDeclaration sought by receivers about entitlement to indemnity

    Court Ruling Unravels Construction Dispute: Developer Wins Nominal Damages as Property Transfer Set Aside

    2021-09-26 Hon. Justice RIORDAN
    Holding Redlich - MelbourneHicks Oakley Chessell Williams
    Read case brief
  • 12›

    Page 1 of 2 · 32 results