LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
4 cases linked to Stenta Legal · sorted by most recent
Firm:Stenta Legal
  • FAMILY LAWPROPERTYDiscrete issueWhere the Second Respondent provided a personal guarantee for a combined debt of $6.8 million and security over two real properties owned by her to enable the husband and wife to purchase property

    Family Feud over $6.8 Million Debt: Court Orders Resolution in Barilis Property Dispute

    2023-06-29 Hon. Justice BAUMANN BRISBANE

以下文字概述:将由D律师事务所信托账户中保存的1,344,421.04美元资金支付给E Finance(贷款编号...03 ...03),以C Barilis女士的名义进行支付,并且所有各方必须签署必要的授权以促进此付款。 如果支付信托资金后,欠E Finance在第二被申请人贷款方面的未偿金额,则: (a) 丈夫需负有未偿金额的责任; 自本裁定日期起十四(14)天内,丈夫应向妻子提供尚未决定的问题清单。 如果各方无法达成同意的问题清单,各方应在2023年8月14日下午4:00之前通过电子邮件将各自的未决问题清单发送至...邮箱。 本程序将于2023年8月17日上午9:30在澳大利亚 联邦巡回法院与家事法院(1专门部门)布里斯班进行案件管理听证会,延期进行。 各方及其法律代表有权在2023年8月17日通过Microsoft Teams视频会议系统以电话方式出庭,具体方式如下:(a) 如果通过电子方式访问本裁定,他们应点击以下链接于2023年8月17日上午9:25以前加入Microsoft Teams视频会议系统;(b) 他们将各自拨打...电话号码并于2023年8月17日上午9:25之前加入;(c) 然后,他们将输入密钥 ...;(d) 保持电话线畅通,直到法庭准备好连接并继续进行。 注:本裁定的形式应与法院记录一致。 注:本裁定原因的副本可能会经过审查,以纠正细微的排版或语法错误(依据2021年澳大利亚联邦巡回法院与家事法院(家事法)规则10.14(b)),或根据2021年澳大利亚联邦巡回法院与家事法院(家事法)规则10.13记录对裁定的修改。 1975年澳大利亚家事法案第121条(联邦法)规定,在非常有限的情况下,禁止发布涉及家事法律程序中人员、关联人员或证人身份的案件。

Stenta Legal
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Read case brief
  • Fraudulent Scheme Exposed: Victim Receives $118,471 After Long Legal Battle Against Deceitful Finance Employee

    2023-04-20 Hon. Justice BEACH
    Stenta Legal
    Read case brief
  • EQUITYBalance of proceeds from sale of land paid into CourtDispute between fourth and fifth defendant regarding entitlement to balance of funds in CourtCompeting equitable interests in land

    High Court Ruling: Dairy Deal Dispute Unravels Ownership of Brighton Properties

    2021-10-14 Hon. Justice RICHARDS
    Norton Rose FulbrightStenta Legal
    Read case brief
  • WILLS AND ESTATESWhere plaintiff seeks to be appointed as administrator ad litemWhere plaintiff in a position of conflict of interestWhere plaintiff unable to provide an administration guarantee.

    Family Feud Erupts Over Elite Middle Park Property: Court Dismisses Son's Bid for Estate Control

    2021-05-06 Hon. Justice MCMILLAN
    KHQ LawyersStenta Legal
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 4 results