LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
27 与 Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
  • TAXES AND DUTIESincome taxcollection and recovery of taxunpaid tax liabilities and penalties

    《税务风暴:澳洲税务专员成功追讨近2450万巨额欠税!》

    2024-09-05
N ADAMS
Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), ss 161(1), 166, 167, 170, 173, 174(1), 175, 175A(1)
查看案例摘要
  • PROCEDUREform of orderscostsgeneral rule that costs follow the event

    《澳洲液体ator大作战:税务局与公司清算人展开资金归属之争!》

    2024-09-03 BLACK
    Macpherson KelleyCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98(1)
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSWinding upApplication by liquidator for directionsWhether liquidator is justified in retaining or repaying certain monies

    《误付款两难:澳大利亚税务局与破产清算人之间的博弈》

    2024-08-11 BLACK
    Macpherson KelleyCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth), s 195-1
    查看案例摘要
  • BANKRUPTCYApplication for review of sequestration order made by Registrarwhether bankruptcy notice was served on debtorbankruptcy notice served

    《债务风暴中的逆袭:法庭拒绝债务人复审申请,确认破产命令》

    2024-07-16 MANOUSARIDIS SYDNEY
    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 8AAB, 14ZY, 14ZZ(1)(a)(i), Sch 1 ss 280-100, 350-10(2), Pt IVC
    查看案例摘要
  • FAMILY LAWPRACTICE AND PROCEEDUREWhere an application is made to release the parties from a Harman undertakingWhere both parties consent to the release of filed material

    《家庭法争议:法院裁定解除保密义务,文件能否公开成为焦点》

    2024-07-15 ALTOBELLI SYDNEY
    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (Cth) s 5
    查看案例摘要
  • MIGRATIONapplication for judicial review of a decision by the Immigration Assessment Authority (“IAA”) affirming refusal of a protection visawhether the IAA’s reasoning was legally unreasonable or irrationalapplication dismissed

    《澳大利亚移民权利受挫:法院驳回伊拉克公民的保护签证申请》

    2023-12-05 LAING SYDNEY

    "请求驳回。注:命令的形式取决于法院记录中的条目。注:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误(根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第2分部)(一般联邦法律)规则2021(Cth)第17.05(2)(g)),或记录根据第17.05法院规则2021(Cth)对命令的变更。"

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • APPEALspecial federal mattersexclusive jurisdiction of federal courtswhether appeal involved a matter “arising under” a Scheduled Commonwealth Act

    《“无效诉讼法”之争:澳大利亚法院拒绝上诉,重申法庭专属管辖权》

    2023-10-04 ADAMSON

    法官拒绝申请人申请上诉2022年2月22日Kunc法官的判决和2022年3月4日进入的命令。命令申请人在本法庭支付被申诉人的费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPartiesVexatious litigantsLeave to institute proceedings

    《澳大利亚法院裁定:维权诉讼限期届满,惹麻烦的原告败诉!》

    2023-07-26 BLACK

    据澳大利亚法院文件显示,要求驳回动议,由Riva NSW Pty Ltd和Ferella先生承担一般性基础的费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 1.12, 36.15
    查看案例摘要
  • BANKRUPTCYMatter settledapplication for costsrelevant considerations.

    破产风波:债权人与债务人“各负其责”终结诉讼,法院无成本裁决

    2023-06-22 CAMERON SYDNEY

    The court orders that the costs of the proceeding be borne by the parties themselves.

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 32
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSWinding upStatutory demandApplication to set aside

    澳大利亚法庭裁定:美国贷款协议未履行,债务的法律争议引发起诉风波!

    2023-03-19 BLACK

    债权人的法定要求被撤销,各方将就费用进行听证。

    Coleman Greig LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Business and Commerce Code (Texas)
    查看案例摘要
  • LAND LAWpossession of landwhere one registered proprietor made bankruptwhere no defence to claim

    破产之路:法庭裁决将财产归还,财政管理者获权接管

    2022-10-19 DAVIES

    根据新南威尔士统一民事诉讼规则2005年第7.15(3)规定,新南威尔士受托人和监护人应被任命为第二被告的监护人。 根据新南威尔士统一民事诉讼规则2005年第7.14(2)规定,只要新南威尔士受托人和监护人的律师负责处理案件,第二被告的监护人不需要通过律师进行诉讼。 原告对该位于新南威尔士兰德维克1/21 Marcel Avenue, Randwick, NSW 2031土地的拥有权判决。 原告获准发出执行法院判决的强制执行令。 第一被告需支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 7.14, 7.15
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSdeparture from usual ruleplaintiff a purchaser under a contract for sale with second defendant vendorsale at a price below market value

    《法庭裁定:卖方责任有限,购房者遭遇“低价陷阱”后需自担诉讼费用》

    2022-10-11 DARKE

    第二被告要支付原告关于索要具体执行的费用。原告要支付第一和第三被告关于解除财产限制令的费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74MA
    查看案例摘要
  • REAL PROPERTYcaveatswithdrawal of caveatsapplication pursuant to section 74MA of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)

    房产争夺战:低于市场价的交易引发撤消警告的法律较量

    2022-09-13 DARKE

    该文涉及到要求就土地出售合同的特定履行制定命令,以及撤回留置权的命令,但前提是必须将一定金额的款项支付至法院。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 74F, s 74MA
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREPartiesVexatious litigantsDeclaration of

    《15年纷争终结:澳大利亚法院裁定“恶意诉讼”者需停止诉讼》

    2022-02-21 KUNC

    将会继续进行,并将颁布禁令。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • MIGRATIONApplication for protection visascountry information relied upon to make adverse credibility findings against applicantswhere corroborating evidence only acceptable if credibility of applicants was accepted

    逃离恐惧:尼日利亚母子申请保护签证遭拒,法庭驳回上诉

    2022-02-09 EGAN

    总结以下文本内容:1. 将第一被申请人的名称修改为“移民、公民、移民服务和多元文化事务部长”。 2. 2021年10月18日提交的修订申请被驳回。 3. 申请人支付第一被申请人与复审申请相关的费用,经双方同意,若无法达成一致,费用将由法庭评估。 注:判决的形式取决于法庭记录的输入。 注:根据《2021年联邦巡回法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭(第2分区)(一般联邦法)规则》,法庭可以修改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正次要的印刷或语法错误(第17.05(2)(g)条),或根据第17.05条记载判决的变更。

    HWL Ebsworth LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss.36(2)(a), (aa) and (2A), 499 Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees Ministerial Direction No.56
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSwinding upcompany liable to pay tax estimates of $4.9 millioncompany fails to revoke estimate

    《澳大利亚公司税务争议:4.9亿澳元的法律博弈与申诉结果揭秘》

    2022-02-08 REES

    根据需求变化,从490万美元降至467万美元,原告需支付费用。

    Gibson Howlin LawyersCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • BANKRUPTCYCOSTSWhere orders made affirming orders made by registrarwhere orders made dismissing an application for review

    澳大利亚法院裁定:破产案件费用达28,000澳元,拒绝申请者不合理抗辩!

    2021-12-22 A KELLY MELBOURNE

    申请人需支付被申述方的费用,金额为$28,328.85。 注意:判决书的形式应符合法院记录的规定。 注意:法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误(根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规第2部分》(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05(2)(g)),或者根据2021年《联邦法庭和澳大利亚家庭法庭法规第2部分》(一般联邦法律)规则第17.05记录对命令的变更。

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • BANKRUPTCYapplication to set aside bankruptcy noticeapplication to extend time within which to comply with bankruptcy noticewhere parties engaged in protracted litigation

    《债务困局:澳大利亚高院对破产通知延展申请的最新裁定》

    2021-10-05 A KELLY

    根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》(以下简称《法院法》)第202-203节的规定,直接允许各方以视频和音频链接的方式在法庭上出庭并发表意见。 对于于2021年9月10日提起的复议申请,驳回该申请。 确认于2021年8月19日作出的第2段命令。 驳回延长履行于2021年5月27日发出的破产通知的时间的申请。 在2021年10月12日星期二下午4点前,各方提交并交付关于本申请费用的任何意见,包括其中的金额(不超过三页)。 任何有关费用的申请将在书面上决定。 注:该命令的形式须根据法院记录进行记录。 注:本判决理由的副本可能经过审查以纠正小的排版或语法错误(根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》第17.05(2)(g)条款规定),或记录根据《2021年联邦巡回和家庭法院法》第17.05条款对命令的变更。

    WMD LawCraddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 30, 40, 41, 52 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 180 Legal Profession Act 2004
    查看案例摘要
  • TAXATIONalleged debts to the Australian Taxation Officedefendant accepted that a company of which he was a director had failed to pay taxation liabilities relating to withholding tax and superannuation guarantee obligationswhether the director took all reasonable steps to cause the company to comply with its taxation obligations

    失控的财务:澳大利亚公司董事因未履行税务责任遭法院判决

    2021-06-22 DICKER SC

    对原告做出判决。双方必须根据这些理由,在七天内就同意的命令达成一致。如果没有达成协议,授权接洽副法官Dicker DCJ将案件重新列入进一步审理。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • INCOME TAXCollection and recoveryProceedings for recoveryGenuine dispute of debt

    巨额税款之争:法庭裁定德克•霍博德须支付308万元!

    2021-04-29 HARRISON ASJ

    判决:被告需向原告支付3,084,394.06美元。法院命令如下:(1)被告需以普通方式支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), s 204
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSvoluntary administrationATO largest creditor, owed $2.6mATO votes against DOCA

    《税务局获赔200万,清算案件揭示公司管理混乱与潜在不公交易》

    2021-03-11 REES

    债权人被命令向清算员偿还200万美元的可撤销交易金额,并支付费用。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSexaminations relating to insolvencywhether time for application to set aside examination summons should be extended

    《法庭拒绝延长期限,债务人遭遇审讯困境》

    2021-02-18 BLACK

    拒绝延长申请废除审查传票的时间。

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSwinding upwhere company in liquidationwhere company hired aircraft from creditor

    法庭裁定:破产公司支付57,860澳元不被宣告无效,债权人权益得以保障!

    2020-11-30 GLEESON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Companies Act 1961 (Cth), s 227
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREInterim preservationFreezing ordersAgainst third parties

    《资产争夺战:澳大利亚税务局申请法庭冻结资产对抗债务人》

    2020-11-17 BLACK

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Craddock Murray Neumann Lawyers
    Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 180, 588FDA, 588FG, 1317S
    查看案例摘要
  • 12›

    第 1 / 2 · 27 条