LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
85 与 Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law) 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREcourt administrationcase managementapplication for summary judgment

    《法庭风云:原告请求被驳回,首被告支付诉讼费用!》

    2022-03-02
CAVANAGH

(1)原告的诉讼请求被驳回。 (2)第一被告应承担诉讼费用,包括今日听证的费用以及与本案有关的第二被告和原告的费用。

Hicksons LawyersWotton + KearneyGerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
查看案例摘要
  • TORTSnegligencemedical treatmentneurosurgery

    《澳洲神经外科手术责任之争:医师获胜,原告败诉赔偿金额无从提交》

    2021-12-12 LEVY SC

    1. 被告的判决和判断结果; 2. 原告要支付被告的正常费用,除非另有命令; 3. 可以归还证据; 4. 如需要进一步或其他命令,可提前7天通知提出申请。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5B, s 5C, s 5D, s 5E, s 5O, s 13, s 16
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDURESection 73 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)Power of court to determine questions in dispute between the parties to the proceedings as to whether and on what terms the proceedings have been compromised or settled between themPlaintiff claims settlement reached

    《法庭悬念!当继承权与领养身份相遇,和解协议还能站得住脚吗?》

    2021-11-22 HALLEN

    法院判决如下:(a) 驳回原告于2021年9月16日提交的动议通知书。(b) 动议费用应由被告承担,除与听证会结束后的提交材料有关的各方费用外,原告应支付被告的费用。(c) 程序定于2021年12月10日进行指引。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) ss 95 & 102
    查看案例摘要
  • INSURANCEAppeal from decision joining insurer to proceedingsWhether there was an insured liabilityWhere insured gave no notice of facts that might give rise to claim

    《保险案件风波:法庭重审揭示通报义务的重要性!》

    2021-11-07 MCCALLUM

    (1) 被准许上诉。 (2) 上诉被允许。 (3) 负责原先判决的法官所做的命令被撤销。 (4) 相应地,联合动议被驳回,并需承担费用。 (5) 被申请人需要支付上诉者的费用。 (6) 如果有其他权利,被申请人将得到根据1951年新南威尔士州《诉讼基金法》的命令。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15AB
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSConsideration of UCPR 20.26 and 42.15AWhere the Plaintiff failed to establish liability in principal proceedings and the Defendant sought indemnity costs following three offers of compromise not accepted by the PlaintiffWhere the Plaintiff submitted that it did not act unreasonably and Court should otherwise order

    《法庭判决:原告拒绝和解提议,须承担被告高额诉讼费用》

    2021-10-07 HATZISTERGOS

    根据2021年8月23日颁布的第2号令,原告应按照常规基础支付被告的费用,截止于2020年9月22日,并从2020年9月23日起按照赔偿基础支付费用。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 88
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREJurisdictionTransfers to and from other courtsDistrict and Local Courts

    《新南威尔士州:个人伤害案件从地区法院转至最高法院,法律程序再度升级》

    2021-09-26 CAVANAGH

    (1)根据2005年新南威尔士州民事诉讼法第140(1)条和(3)(b)(i)条款,新南威尔士州悉尼地区法院于2019/00372446号案件的诉讼程序已被转移到新南威尔士州悉尼最高法院。 (2)我将在2021年10月7日之前将此事列入注册员的指示事项。 (3)传唤费用属于案件费用。

    Wotton + KearneyGerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREsettlementno question of principle

    《关键时刻:澳大利亚法庭首肯和解协议,得以平息纷争》

    2021-09-02 BEECH-JONES AT CL

    获批公司解决方案。参见[13]。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005
    查看案例摘要
  • PERSONAL INJURYPlaintiff sustained injury to his left wrist performing work for the Defendant as a general labourer using a high pressure hoseWhere evidence of different versions recorded about how accident occurredGeneral caution to be exercised in considering such versions

    《意外受伤案判决:劳工未能证明工作安全责任,法院支持被告》

    2021-08-22 HATZISTERGOS

    被告的判决结果。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Liability Act 2005 (NSW), ss 3, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5H, 13
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREapplication for expedited hearingproceedings for medical negligencePlaintiff with cancer

    《癌症患者争取快速审理 医疗过失案获批加速进程》

    2021-07-15 JOHNSON

    以下是文本的主要内容摘要: 1. 审理程序被加速进行。 2. 当事人要提供简要的裁定记录以推进诉讼进程,并将在法庭内做出进一步的裁定。 3. 提起的动议的费用将作为案件的费用承担。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSParty/PartyBases of quantificationIndemnity basis

    法院拒绝特别费用申请,诉讼双方各自承担费用!

    2021-05-26 MONTGOMERY

    (1)关于此申请,我注意到被告承诺提交动议通知书并支付适当的费用;(2)被告关于费用特别命令的申请的动议通知书被驳回;(3)双方各自承担动议的费用。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 131(1), ss 131(2)(h)
    查看案例摘要
  • NEGLIGENCEduty of carebreachstandard of care

    外科手术后隐患:医疗事故索赔案庭审揭露专业判断的灰色地带

    2021-05-17 BASTEN AT [1]

    (1)驳回对于地方法院于2020年7月31日做出的判决的上诉。(2)命令上诉人支付被上诉人在本法院的费用。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT), ss 42, 43, 45
    查看案例摘要
  • ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGESnoneconomic lossfuture loss of earning capacity

    意外风灾:澳洲女子游泳池遭飞来伞击倒,赢得16万赔偿!

    2021-05-12 RUSSELL SC

    (1) 原告对被告判决赔偿169,091.87美元。 (2) 要求被告支付原告的费用。 (3) 同意当事人通过电子邮件与我的助理联系,如果任何一方希望寻求不同的费用决定,限期为7天。

    Mills OakleyGerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 16
    查看案例摘要
  • TORTSNegligenceSexual AssaultTORTS

    《悲剧与法律交错:澳大利亚诉伊莎贝尔·佩里性侵犯案》

    2021-04-29 MONTGOMERY

    1. 被告判定胜诉。 2. 原告需支付被告的诉讼费用。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ss 3B(1)(a), 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 21
    查看案例摘要
  • MOTOR ACCIDENTS COMPENSATION ACTstatutory constructionfault caused by owner in use or operationscope of legislation

    《叉车事故致重伤,雇员获赔296万澳元:雇主疏忽成关键!》

    2021-03-11 CAVANAGH

    (1) 判决原告赔偿金额为2,960,000美元。 (2) 被告需支付原告的诉讼费用。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • APPEALapplication for leave refusedcosts orderedapplication to vary order

    胜负已定!法庭裁定Hungry Jack's赔偿Sylvia Fourtounas高额诉讼费用!

    2021-03-04 BASTEN

    2020年12月10日下达了一个变更令,要求申请人支付被告方在本法庭的费用,现在修改为:应当命令申请人支付被告方的费用,按照普通基础评估到2020年10月15日,并且之后按照保险基础支付,这些费用应当包括变更之前的费用。

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 20.26, 42.15A, 51.47
    查看案例摘要
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWWhether reviewable error of lawJurisdictional errorError of law on the face of the record

    《伤者索赔之路:医疗评估的法律争议与“阮原则”的考验》

    2020-12-23 CAVANAGH

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 3.4, ss 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 131, 132, 133
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREleave to appealfailure to address defenceabsence of factual findings supporting defence

    《车库意外背后的法律迷雾:汉堡王“危险风险”辩护失效,上诉遭驳回》

    2020-12-09 BASTEN

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5F, 5H
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREapprovalwhether proposed settlement in the best interests of the plaintiffsettlement approved

    医院失误换来巨额和解,女子不幸遭遇终生护理危机

    2020-12-02 HARRISON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDURESeparate determinationUniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 28.2Application to consider liability in relation to two defendants before other issues

    《抉择心声:澳大利亚母亲因超声波失误求偿案揭开医疗责任真相》

    2020-11-19 SCHMIDT

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss. 56, 57, 58(2), 59, 60
    查看案例摘要
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJudicial reviewState Insurance Regulatory AuthorityMotor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)

    《一场赔偿纠纷:法庭重审交通事故伤残评估,原判决继续生效》

    2020-11-12 HARRISON

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), ss 57, 57A, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 131, 133
    查看案例摘要
  • PROCEDUREapplication for leave to commence proceedings under s 151D of the Workers Compensation Act 1987whether plaintiff has arguable cause of actionexplanation for delay

    《工伤索赔梦碎!法庭驳回护士上诉,因证据不足和延误失去合法权益》

    2020-10-22 RUSSELL

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), s 66, s 151D
    查看案例摘要
  • Practice & ProcedureRe‑examination Evidence arising Out Of Cross‑ExaminationLeading QuestionEvidence Act 1995

    《法庭风暴:护士揭露家庭秘密,触碰界限的“打屁股游戏”引发法律之战!》

    2020-09-22 MONTGOMERY

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 37, 38, 39, 42 & 192
    查看案例摘要
  • Civil Practice & ProcedureDefence Objection to Cross‑Examination of its WitnessObjection on the Basis of RelevanceAdmissibility of Oral Evidence under ss 55‑56 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)

    《法庭热议:家庭环境与性侵案中的证人交叉询问之争》

    2020-09-20 MONTGOMERY

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 55‑56
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREapplication for approval of settlement of personal injury proceedings commenced on behalf of person under legal incapacitywhether proposed settlement is in the interests of the plaintiff

    8岁脑瘫男孩成功和解,法院批准赔偿案以保障未来福祉

    2020-09-20 IERACE

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    Gerard Malouf & Partners (GMP Law)
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 76
    查看案例摘要
  • ‹1234›

    第 3 / 4 · 85 条