LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
103 与 McCullough Robertson 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:McCullough Robertson
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWapplication for review lodged out of timewhether reasonable explanation for the delay

    《澳洲法庭驳回申请者延长复审期限 申请再遭冷遇》

    2024-03-21
S HIGGINS

法官命令取消申请人延长时间申请的听证会,拒绝申请人延长时间提交行政复议申请的申请,取消了2024年4月8日的案件会议。申请人寻求复审的决定是2023年8月2日由被告作出的决定。

McCullough Robertson
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)
查看案例摘要
  • PROCEDURECIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTSJOINDER OF CAUSES OF ACTION AND OF PARTIESPARTIES

    《社区物业诉设计与施工合同真伪引发的法律争议:应否追加被告揭开真相?》

    2024-02-08 MARTIN SJA

    申请被驳回。

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • PROCEDURECIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTSCOSTSGENERAL RULE: COSTS FOLLOW EVENT

    法律争端下的费率较量:法庭裁定“费用随事件”原则,成败皆有成本!

    2024-02-04 MARTIN SJA

    被告需按照标准基础支付申请人的费用。

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSmotion for contempt following service of subpoenasubpoena complied with following service of motion for contemptwhether recipient of subpoena showed wilful disobedience of subpoena such as to warrant costs order

    贱卖或失控?悉尼港环境公司与Holcim的法庭对峙

    2024-01-29 STEVENSON

    驳回藐视法庭的申请,不需要支付任何费用。

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • LICENSINGfirearmsfit and proper personpublic interest

    《枪支许可案:法律与安全的博弈,真相与谎言的较量!》

    2024-01-07 NAIDA ISENBERG

    法官命令被审查的决定得到确认。

    McCullough Robertson
    Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDURENotice of Motion seeking summary dismissal or strike out of proceedingsUniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 13.4 and 14.28No reasonable cause of action disclosed

    澳大利亚法庭裁定:一起涉及地方政府与业主之间开发申请纠纷的案件中,程序公平的声索面临重大挑战

    2023-12-21 ROBSON

    请参考第107条的法官命令。

    McCullough Robertson
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56
    查看案例摘要
  • MORTGAGES AND SECURITIESMortgagesDuties, rights and remedies of mortgageeForeclosure

    百万贷款纠纷:未签合约的假象与权益争夺

    2023-11-29 BLACK

    法庭解散,原告应支付被告的诉讼费用,按约定或评估的方式支付。

    McCullough Robertson
    - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 94
    查看案例摘要
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiescaravan park

    《澳大利亚蓝海边的宿营地重建计划获批,长效居住地将增至155个!》

    2023-11-20 KULLEN AC

    法庭命令:(1)上诉被支持。 (2)对于在布鲁伊斯海滩博默兰德街321号(大地编号862876号)和布鲁伊斯海滩湖湾大道3901号(部分编号753168号)的现有房车公园进行改建和增加的开发申请编号DA2022/1248,已经根据在附件A中列出的条件被批准。您的尊敬(荣誉)法官。

    McCullough Robertson
    Biodiversity Conservation (Savings and Transitional) Regulation 2017, cl 34A
    查看案例摘要
  • STATUTESACTS OF PARLIAMENTINTERPRETATIONOTHER MATTERS

    法律角度独家揭秘:澳大利亚建筑付款法下的审判风波,判决因程序公正缺失而遭颠覆!

    2023-11-09 WILSON

    当事方须在2024年2月28日前根据此理由提交草案命令。费用问题将延后处理。

    McCullough RobertsonIrish Bentley Lawyers
    查看案例摘要
  • BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTIONGrosvenor or Brodyn staycouple enter into contract for home renovationpayment claim for variations

    装修合同风波:澳洲法庭拒绝延缓建筑商款项支付,财务风险谁主沉浮?

    2023-08-17 REES

    拒绝留下。

    McCullough Robertson
    Building and Construction Industry Security of Payments Act 1999 (NSW), s 20(2B)
    查看案例摘要
  • MODIFICATION APPLICATIONconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    纠纷和解!澳大利亚法庭顺利修改开发许可,促成各方达成协议

    2023-08-01 DIXON

    法院命令:(1)申请获得批准。(2)发展许可证编号DA256/2016在附件A中进行修改。(3)法院修改后的发展许可证编号DA256/2016在附件B中。(4)陈列品被保留。

    McCullough RobertsonCorrs Chambers Westgarth
    Canterbury Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 2.3, 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 5.10, 5.21, 6.1
    查看案例摘要
  • DEVELOPMENT APPEALconciliation conferenceagreement between the partiesorders

    《胜诉!田野运输中心获批,环保与发展双赢新篇章》

    2023-07-20 KULLEN AC

    法院命令:(1)上诉被支持。(2)允许在普雷斯顿斯贝尼拉路20号(地块1007,DP 1273535)建设运输基地的开发申请DA-549/2022,包括附属车间、办公室和实验室,并按照附件A的条件批准。

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7
    查看案例摘要
  • HUMAN RIGHTSDisability discriminationwhether in dismissing the applicant the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the applicant on the ground of the applicant’s disabilitieswhether by taking other actions the respondent unlawfully discriminated against the applicant by subjecting the applicant to any other detriment

    不平等的轨迹:悉尼火车公司因残疾歧视被告上法庭

    2023-06-22 MANOUSARIDIS SYDNEY

    2023年7月14日上午9:30,将为与赔偿有关的指示听证会进行程序。请注意:裁决的形式取决于法庭记录中的条目。请注意:法庭可根据《2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院法(第二部分)(一般联邦法)规则》(Cth)第17.05(2)(g)条款校正小的排版或语法错误以及根据《2021年《联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院法(第二部分)(一般联邦法)规则》(Cth)第17.05条款记录对命令的变更。

    McCullough Robertson
    Australian Human Rights Commission Act
    查看案例摘要
  • CIVIL PROCEDUREjurisdictiontransfers to and from other courtsapplication to transfer from Local Court to Supreme Court

    《法院争议:地方法院转交至最高法院请求遭拒,损害赔偿计算引发关注》

    2023-06-04 ROTHMAN

    以下是一个简短的中文总结: (1) 传票被驳回。 (2) 本次申请的费用将成为案件费用。

    McCullough Robertson
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 140
    查看案例摘要
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONconsent sought for demolition and construction of four storey residential flat buildingsite within Heritage Conservation Areawhether the development has adverse impacts on the conservation area

    《北悉尼高街四层住宅楼获批,法院判决:保护与发展并重》

    2023-05-15 DICKSON

    法院命令:(1)上诉被支持。 (2)建设申请DA281/21寻求同意拆除现有建筑物,挖掘并建造一个位于107 High Street,North Sydney(SP3013)的四层住宅公寓建筑,获准,但须遵守附件A中的条件。 (3)展品已归还,但除了展品2和C。

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.17, 8.7
    查看案例摘要
  • PROFESSIONS AND TRADESHEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALSNURSESDISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

    《护士醉心救人却犯禁!法庭决定只暂缓注册,背后真相大揭秘》

    2023-04-11 MULLINS P

    裁定准予上诉。 上诉被驳回。

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONDwelling houseconciliation conferenceagreement between parties

    澳大利亚小区新建筑获批:法庭调解引领发展新局面

    2023-03-30 DICKSON

    法院命令如下:(1)申请人获准依赖于第[6]段列出的修订计划。 (2)上诉得到支持。 (3)对于新南威尔士州奥特利市帕克大道44号(地块21 DP 3230)的用于建造新的两层住宅及相关园林和场地工程开发申请编号DA2021/0189的批准,以附件A中的条件为限。

    McCullough Robertson
    Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.7
    查看案例摘要
  • CORPORATIONSCorporations Act 2001 (Cth)Part 5.4Insolvency

    《法庭审理引爆争议,财务危机中的公司董事能否独揽大权?》

    2023-03-28 HETYEY ASJ
    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • JUDICIAL REVIEWGROUNDS OF REVIEWERROR OF LAWwhere the respondent rejected an application made by the applicants for the grant of a mineral development licence under s 186(1)(b) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld)

    《司法复审:澳洲矿业许可申请遭拒,"公众利益"判定引发法律争议》

    2023-03-13 HINDMAN

    该裁决被撤销。双方应就诉讼费用提出意见。

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWFirearms licence refusalfit and proper personpublic interest

    《火药味十足:澳大利亚拒绝枪支许可的背后真相》

    2022-12-15 S MONTGOMERY

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
    查看案例摘要
  • ADMINISTRATIVE LAWGROUNDS OF REVIEWJURISDICTIONAL MATTERSwhere the applicant as principal and the first and second respondents as contractor entered into a contract for construction work

    合同争议风云:澳大利亚建筑项目中的隐性条件与判决有效性之战

    2022-12-07 BRADLEY
    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • Administrative LawFirearms licence refusalfit and proper personpublic interest

    火器执照申请被拒:公共利益与交通违法的博弈

    2022-11-30 S MONTGOMERY

    对待审查的决定予以确认。

    McCullough Robertson
    Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
    查看案例摘要
  • ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNINGENVIRONMENTAL PLANNINGPLANNING SCHEMES AND INSTRUMENTSQUEENSLAND

    超市建设入不敷出!澳大利亚法庭驳回开发商上诉,缺乏市场需求成关键

    2022-11-01 BOND

    拒绝上诉,需支付费用。

    McCullough Robertson
    查看案例摘要
  • LICENSINGfirearmslicence revocationunregistered firearm

    《枪支执照重获自由:法院撤销执照吊销判决,重塑公众信任》

    2022-10-27 EMERITUS PROF G D WALKER

    The text discusses the option for a discovering party to serve affidavits outlining the steps taken in relation to specific issues identified during the discovery process. If these affidavits are not provided, the other party will be allowed to cross-examine the individuals who provided the original affidavits during discovery.

    McCullough Robertson
    Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW)
    查看案例摘要
  • ‹12345›

    第 2 / 5 · 103 条