LegalLink
判例法官律所聊天定价
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI 驱动的法律咨询

产品

  • 判例
  • 法官
  • 律所
  • 聊天
  • 定价

公司

  • 隐私政策
  • 服务条款
  • Cookies 政策
  • service@legallink.info

资源

  • 意见反馈

按州查询律师注册名录

  • 新南威尔士州,NSW
  • 昆士兰州,QLD
  • 西澳大利亚州,WA
  • 南澳大利亚州,SA
  • 塔斯马尼亚州,TAS
  • 澳大利亚首都领地,ACT
  • 北领地,NT
  • 维多利亚州,VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. 保留所有权利。
首页案例库

真实 澳大利亚案例法

每条搜索结果均基于已公开的判决,绝不杜撰判例。

筛选
11 与 McMahons Lawyers 相关的案例 · 按最新排序
律所:McMahons Lawyers
  • INSURANCEpublic liability insurancewhere insured was builder responsible for construction sitewhere formworker slipped and fell from scaffolding

    建筑工地事故赔偿案:保险公司因虚假陈述拒赔,法庭最终判定责任合理性

    2024-04-23 PAYNE

法官驳回上诉并支付费用。

Sanford LegalMcMahons Lawyers
Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth)
查看案例摘要
  • NEGLIGENCEduty of carereasonable foreseeability of harmconstruction site

    《澳大利亚建筑工地事故:责任、过失与索赔的法律较量!》

    2023-11-23 SCHMIDT AJ

    Mr Burnett胜诉迈纳哈顿房地产有限公司。双方被指示就最终计算、最终命令条件(包括成本),进行会商,并在14天内提交拟议命令。如果还有任何争议,他们也应在14天内提出并提交一份概要,解决该争议。

    Brydens LawyersMcMahons Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 3, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5E, 5R, 5S, 1, 13, 15, 16, Div 8
    查看案例摘要
  • NEGLIGENCEWorkplace injurywhere plaintiff fell in a stormwater drain on construction sitewhere plaintiff’s employer uninsured

    工地事故引发的法律斗争:雇主责任与伤害赔偿的复杂纠葛

    2023-11-02 CAVANAGH

    法官裁定原告针对第一被告的判决金额由双方商定或确定。法官裁定原告针对第二和第三被告的判决金额由双方商定或确定。法官命令各方在21天内采取行动,就判决金额达成一致,包括对反诉的判决。随后,法官命令各方联系法官办公室,要么输入判决金额,要么寻求将案件重新列为进一步辩论。

    Hicksons LawyersMcMahons LawyersWithstand Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), Part 1A, ss 5B
    查看案例摘要
  • INSURANCEplaintiff makes an insurance claim using the Financial Services Ombudsman (FSO) after his home suffers flood damageclaim adjudicated subject to further expert reports being prepared and servedparties exchange expert reports and defendant makes offers based on those reports

    保单索赔闹剧:新南威尔士州一起保险纠纷的最终裁决

    2023-02-16 GIBSON

    以下是文本的中文摘要: (1) 对被告方做出判决。 (2) 保留费用,申请自由。 (3) 展品保留,直到进一步的命令。

    McMahons LawyersHall & Wilcox
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSparty/partygeneral rule that costs follow the eventwhere all parties submitted that the general rule be departed from

    澳大利亚判例:复杂诉讼程序引发的成本之争,成功原告与失败被告的经济博弈

    2022-05-01 N ADAMS

    (1) 被告应自2018年2月1日至2020年7月2日按照普通标准支付原告的费用。 (2) 原告应自2020年7月3日起按照赔偿标准支付被告的费用。 (3) 被告应自2018年5月1日至2019年11月29日按照普通标准支付反诉被告的费用,之后按照赔偿标准支付。 (4) 损害赔偿要求的利息从2016年12月18日至2020年8月17日支付,但此后不再支付。

    Campbell Paton & TaylorBaldock Stacy & NivenMcMahons Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56-58, 98, 100
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSmultiple defendantsplaintiff successful against company first defendant onlywhether plaintiff should pay costs of director second defendant where same legal representatives were retained

    《法庭风云:原告胜诉首被告,第二被告成本之争引发法律争议》

    2021-11-17 ABADEE

    请提供所需的文本,然后我们将为您提供中文摘要。

    Brydens LawyersMcMahons Lawyers
    Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (NSW) s 2, Sch 1 cl 6
    查看案例摘要
  • TORTSnegligenceplaintiff suffers personal injury after falling onto star picket while walking backwards up a drivewayclaim brought against construction company and director as occupants of easement where injury occurred

    《行走中的意外:澳大利亚男子因倒退摔伤起诉建筑公司,索赔胜利!》

    2021-11-04 ABADEE

    Paragraph 198 cannot be summarized without the original text. Please provide the necessary information for me to assist you further.

    Brydens LawyersMcMahons Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) ss 5F, 5G, 5H, 5I, 13
    查看案例摘要
  • PRACTICE AND PROCEDUREcivilclaim for personal injury damagesapplication for adjournment by defendants on final day of hearing

    《法庭风云:被告突遭医疗困扰,诉讼终结悬念重重!》

    2021-10-28 ABADEE

    请提供一段文字,我会帮您进行中文总结。

    Brydens LawyersMcMahons Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56, 57, 58, 66
    查看案例摘要
  • COSTSParty/PartyExceptions to general rule that costs follow the eventwhere parties experienced mixed success across two proceedings

    法庭审理惊心动魄:涉及公司治理的利益之争与费用裁决

    2021-10-28 HENRY

    请参阅[123]。

    McMahons Lawyers
    Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 42.1, 42.2, 42.19
    查看案例摘要
  • NEGLIGENCEBreachdestruction of railway sleepers by firefire caused by use of arc welder in paddock in summer

    火灾引发的失控:澳大利亚农场主焊接失误竟埋下赔偿巨额隐患!

    2021-10-14 N ADAMS

    (1) 原告判决被告赔偿金额为177,290美元,并附加利息。 (2) 驳回对交叉被告的反诉。 (3) 关于费用和利息的问题将保留,待各方提交书面意见后再作决定。

    Campbell Paton & TaylorBaldock Stacy & NivenMcMahons Lawyers
    Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5A, 5B, 5C, 5R
    查看案例摘要
  • EVIDENCEExclusion of evidenceImproperly or illegally obtained evidencewhere non

    家族公司争议解析

    2021-07-11 HENRY

    请参阅第[1118]和第[1119]段。

    McMahons Lawyers
    Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56
    查看案例摘要
  • 第 1 / 1 · 11 条