LegalLink
CasesJudgesLaw FirmsChatPricing
LegalLink
LegalLink

AI-powered legal consultation

Product

  • Cases
  • Judges
  • Law Firms
  • Chat
  • Pricing

Company

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookies Policy
  • service@legallink.info

Resources

  • Feedback

Explore Lawyer Registers by State

  • New South Wales, NSW
  • Queensland, QLD
  • Western Australia, WA
  • South Australia, SA
  • Tasmania, TAS
  • Australian Capital Territory, ACT
  • Northern Territory, NT
  • Victoria, VIC
© 2026 LegalLink. All rights reserved.
HomeCases

Real Australian Case Law

Every search returns plain-English summaries grounded in published judgments — never invented precedent.

Filters
4 cases linked to Saines Legal · sorted by most recent
Firm:Saines Legal
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWCOSTSWhere Calderbank Offers made soon after commencement of proceedingswhere offers rejected outright

    Court Rules Applicant to Foot the Bill After Ignoring Settlement Offers in Costly Employment Dispute

    2023-05-31 Hon. Justice EGAN BRISBANE

    根据2020年7月7日至2022年12月23日期间的诉讼BRG137/2020,申请人对第一被申请人以及第二被申请人的费用负有支付责任,并采用保全基础进行支付。申请人应根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第二部)(联邦一般法律)规则2021(Cth)第22.10条的规定,支付给第一被申请人经同意的费用,如果双方未达成一致,则需依法进行审核。注意:判决的形式须符合法院记录的要求。同时,法院可根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第二部)(联邦一般法律)规则2021(Cth)第17.05(2)(g)条对文字或语法错误进行修正,或者根据澳大利亚联邦法院和家庭法院(第二部)(联邦一般法律)规则2021(Cth)第17.05条记录对判决的变更。

Saines Legal
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss. 545 and 570.
Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWinterpretation of the words “the dispute” in s 365 of the Fair Work Actthe need for a certificate pursuant to s 368 of the FW Act before filing an applicationapplication struck out

    Court Strikes Out Griffith University Claim, Costing Applicants $5,000 in Fair Work Dispute

    2023-05-14 Hon. Justice VASTA BRISBANE

    2022年6月17日提交的申请被驳回。申请人支付被申请人的费用,金额为5000美元。注意:订单的形式受法院记录的影响。注意:法院可以修改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正或记录微小的排版或语法错误,或按照联邦法院和家庭法院法(第2部)(联邦一般法律)规则2021年修订命令。

    Saines Legal
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth): ss 50, 340, 341, 351, 365, 368, 370, 372, 570
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWFAIR WORKwhether the applicant had a disability at the time of the commencement of his employment and during the course of his employmentwhether any person employed by or associated with the first respondent knew or ought reasonably to have known of any such disability

    Court Dismisses Disability Claims in Employment Termination Case

    2022-12-22 Hon. Justice EGAN BRISBANE

    以下文件中的申请人的要求,即在2020年10月16日提交的修改后的起诉书,应予以驳回。 双方各自有权就费用问题提出申请,需提前通知对方两天。 注意:该命令的形式应受到法院记录的影响。 注意:根据澳大利亚联邦巡回法院和家庭法院(第二分部)(一般联邦法)规则2021(澳大利亚联邦法),法院可以修改或撤销判决或命令,以纠正次要的排版或语法错误(第17.05(2)(g)条款),或根据2021年(澳大利亚联邦法)联邦巡回法院和家庭法院(第二分部)(一般联邦法)规则(第17.05条款)记录对命令的变更。

    Saines Legal
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss. 342(1) Item 1, 351, 361, 545 and 550.
    Read case brief
  • INDUSTRIAL LAWMisrepresentationjurisdiction of Part 31 of the FW Act

    Court Dismisses Misrepresentation Claims Against QTeachers: Teacher Union Controversy Unfolds

    2022-08-31 Hon. Justice VASTA BRISBANE

    2021年2月28日提交的申请被驳回。 注:该判决的形式应符合法院记录的要求。 注:根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院法则(第2部分)(普通联邦法规)》第17.05(2)(g)规定,法院可以变更或撤销判决或命令,以纠正轻微的排版或语法错误;或者根据《2021年联邦巡回法院和澳大利亚家庭法院法则(第2部分)(普通联邦法规)》第17.05规定,记录对判决的变动。

    Holding Redlich - MelbourneSaines Legal
    Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth): Part 3-1, s 30
    Read case brief
  • Page 1 of 1 · 4 results